Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George W. Bush to answer questions live from Facebook headquarters [Today at 2 PM PST]
TekGoblin ^ | 2010-11-29

Posted on 11/29/2010 5:27:05 AM PST by justlurking

Facebook has just announced that George W. Bush is going to be present tomorrow November 29th to answer questions about his new book Decision Points. The discussion will happen on Facebook Live at 2PM PST.

It is unclear whether Mark Zuckerberg will be attending the Q&A but its likely. I can only assume that Facebook is the platform for this discussion because of the sheer number of members Bush can reach at one time. There is no mention of who will interview the president and how long it will take but I am sure more information will develop as we get closer to the time frame of the interview.

(Excerpt) Read more at tekgoblin.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: facebook; georgewbush; gwbush; rino; virtualtownhall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-107 next last

1 posted on 11/29/2010 5:27:07 AM PST by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: justlurking

I don’t do facebook-—but this should be interesting. I’m reading his book right now, and enjoying it.


2 posted on 11/29/2010 5:28:55 AM PST by basil (It's time to rid the country of "Gun Free Zones" aka "Killing Fields")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

Ask him if he hopes Agenda 21 and Amnesty for Illegals are implemented during the Obama administration, before the Tea Party gets more powerful.

No more Bush Rinos.


3 posted on 11/29/2010 5:33:30 AM PST by unspun (It's the Sovereignty, Stu... um... art. | WE ARE GULAG BOUND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil
I am also reading it right now, and I am enjoying it immensely. Love, or Hate some of his political decisions (especially during the end of his terms) he is one man that exudes class.

Going through the chapter on 9/11, I teared up more than once. Reading the book just brought back memories I had forgotten. We were so lucky to have President Bush at that time in history!

4 posted on 11/29/2010 5:37:00 AM PST by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

...zzzzzz....


5 posted on 11/29/2010 5:37:34 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

No more Bush Rinos.

Bump.


6 posted on 11/29/2010 5:44:38 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Scratch a “progressive” and a fascist bleeds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: unspun

“Ask him if he hopes Agenda 21 and Amnesty for Illegals are implemented during the Obama administration, before the Tea Party gets more powerful.

No more Bush Rinos.”

Ignorance...how some are so proud of it.


7 posted on 11/29/2010 5:45:43 AM PST by Wpin ("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: justlurking
"There is no mention of who will interview the president"

He will most likely take questions from the facebook community with a moderator feeding him questions from the mountain of questions that will come in. At least, that's my best guess. A huge get for Facebook and shows their growing power.
8 posted on 11/29/2010 5:54:05 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Yep.

Bush set the table.

000bbb served the meal.


9 posted on 11/29/2010 5:58:37 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wpin

The major problem I have with Bush (whom I voted-for twice) is that, Bush ‘checked out’ of the Presidency in 2005 (after winning re-election in 2004). Proof:

- he did not take the Iraq insurgency seriously to increase troop levels, leaving a wake of GI deaths that by 2006 we lost Congress over the war issue.

- he did not manage/control/attack the financial situation BEFORE it wound up being a crisis in 2007/8, leaving a WIDE GAPING HOLE for Obama to jump through.

- he TELLS the country in AUG/SEP 2008 that we have a “financial crisis” that requires IMMEDIATE BAILOUTS to BANKS and AUTOMAKERS, opening the door wide open for the in-coming RATs to raid the people’s treasury to unbelievable proportions.

- and I don’t even want to get into Illegals/Open Borders/Amnesty, and a Bloated Government.


10 posted on 11/29/2010 6:00:41 AM PST by LibFreeUSA (Show me what Obama brought that was new and there you will find things only radical and destructive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wpin

Ad hominem is the sign of a failed argument (which is ironic, since the charge is “ignorance”).


11 posted on 11/29/2010 6:04:47 AM PST by unspun (It's the Sovereignty, Stu... um... art. | WE ARE GULAG BOUND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Mr. President: Did you agree with your wife when she called opposition to the nomination of Harriet Meirs sexist?


12 posted on 11/29/2010 6:13:36 AM PST by GlockThe Vote (Who needs Al Queda to worry about when we have Obama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: unspun

It’s going to be fun watching the last vestiges of Bush lovers here on FR continue to hold this man up on a pedestal. If Bush had only remained neutral instead of swinging left on financial and social issues we wouldn’t have Obama.


13 posted on 11/29/2010 6:15:44 AM PST by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
It's fun for the majority of freepers who respect President Bush for his character, patriotism and class, to watch the vestiges of irrational Bush haters flail on every pro-Bush thread.

Apparently you don't have much going on in your lives that you hang on to this irrational emotion against a fine man who did the best he could, asking God daily for help, and leading us with strength.

You know, ray, it IS possible to disagree with policy and still not hate the man.

14 posted on 11/29/2010 6:22:04 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

btw, your premise that Bush led us to Obama is highly flawed and not backed up by historical fact.


15 posted on 11/29/2010 6:23:09 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: justlurking; DrDeb
This is going to be an interesting Q and A.

Unfortunately I have to miss it, but I expect a full report.

16 posted on 11/29/2010 6:25:53 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA
- he did not manage/control/attack the financial situation BEFORE it wound up being a crisis in 2007/8,

He and Paulson went around clucking like chickens that "subprime was contained." Doesn't that count?

And W's tiny amount of vetoes during eight years is worth mentioning.

17 posted on 11/29/2010 6:34:34 AM PST by Moonman62 (Half of all Americans are above average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA

Gee, I remember him trying to privatize social security and being ignored by actual RINOs.


18 posted on 11/29/2010 6:36:32 AM PST by freedom_is_earned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
You know, ray, it IS possible to disagree with policy and still not hate the man.

Do you EVER post to someone who disagrees with you about Bush WITHOUT a strawman or hyperbole?

19 posted on 11/29/2010 6:40:02 AM PST by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
btw, your premise that Bush led us to Obama is highly flawed and not backed up by historical fact.

Oh, yes it is. You just don't want to believe it.

20 posted on 11/29/2010 6:41:03 AM PST by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Isn’t it predictably hubristic that the pseudo-con, neo-libertarian haters actually think they’re the majority here at FR and, even more delusionally, among the voting electorate . . . bahahahaha!


21 posted on 11/29/2010 6:43:43 AM PST by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

An open invitation to the Internet — why do I have a bad feeling about this?


22 posted on 11/29/2010 6:46:52 AM PST by tricksy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
He will most likely take questions from the facebook community with a moderator feeding him questions from the mountain of questions that will come in.

You couldn't pay me enough to take the job of finding the worthwhile questions (if any) out of the flood of crap that's bound to roll in.

23 posted on 11/29/2010 6:46:59 AM PST by tricksy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedom_is_earned
-"...I remember him trying ..."

When you're the TOP BOSS, you don't get points for "trying", you get points for "results".

Libtards are the only ones who go around crying, not wanting anyone to remember their mistakes, and then scream and expect points for "trying".

24 posted on 11/29/2010 6:53:34 AM PST by LibFreeUSA (Show me what Obama brought that was new and there you will find things only radical and destructive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Bush was the worst Republican President that I know of. I will say that to his face.

At least Nixon, got us out of Vietnam.


25 posted on 11/29/2010 6:57:21 AM PST by LibFreeUSA (Show me what Obama brought that was new and there you will find things only radical and destructive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: justlurking
"I don't do Facebook....."

I don't do GW, either.

How anyone can sit through all these constant "interviews" and listen to an hour or so of absolutely NOTHING AT ALL is beyond me. Listen closely to him. He's an elephant that labors mightily and delivers a mouse.

He grins and beams and soothes but gives no new insights, propounds no original thoughts, gives no unknown historical perspectives....and dances all around the hard questions.

The "compassionate conservative" facade never slips for a moment. His "interviews" are a waste of what could be productive time.

He avoids anything and everything controversial, citing the "dignity of the presidency"......yet his travelling road show of blatant shilling for money for his book belies this "dignity" pose.....and is reminiscent to me of O'Reilly's never-ending "Bold, Fresh" hucksterism crap.

Other than that, I like ole George.

Leni

26 posted on 11/29/2010 7:08:37 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Well, it was going to be either Obama or Hillary. There was no chance McCain would have won, no matter what Bush's record was. The libs, far left wingers, and anti-American crowd were sure to get McCain defeated, whatever they had to do. Obama only became the front runner for the Dems because they focused on the race issue, knowing that the bi-racial candidate would certainly sew up the black vote. That was their cushion. And the powers that be behind it all also knew that many white Americans would vote out of "guilt," and pretending to be politically correct. America was played, and those who didn't care about the importance of knowing the true background of Obama, fell for the "warm fuzzies" feeling and voted based on emotion, not intelligence.

Hillary would have been almost as bad as Zero on national policies, and certainly would have pushed many socialist agendas. However, there would not be the Muslim love fest going on in the White House under Hillary's leadership. The only other difference is that she would have been stronger internationally, and retained more respect for the U.S.

So, no, Bush did not lead us to Obama.

27 posted on 11/29/2010 7:17:11 AM PST by CitizenM (If we ever forget that we're one nation under GOD, then we will be a nation gone under.-Ronald Re)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
It's only accurate if you base your opinion on anger (emotion), and ignore the following historical facts:

The media and left lied and belittled Bush for 8 years
The media lied about Iraq for 6 years
The media overblew Republican "scandals" and ignored Democrat crimes
There was a Democrat caused economic crash, conveniently timed right before the election to do the most damage
McCain, as a candidate, stank
McCain is a RINO without principle
McCain campaigned against Bush but refused to campaign against Obama
The media lied and exalted Obama
The American people were stupid enough to believe the garbage Obama was spouting
The youth of America voted for an American Idol and not a candidate
Everyone, including RINO Republicans refused to admit that Obama was a radical
Billions of illegal foreign dollars were spent on electing Obama

So.......you see, ray. The historical facts are with me and the feelings are with you.

28 posted on 11/29/2010 7:22:16 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Do you EVER post to someone who disagrees with you about Bush WITHOUT a strawman or hyperbole?

That is really, really, really funny coming from you.

Especially considering your ad hominem, strawman post to which I was responding.

At any rate, the majority of us conservatives still respect President Bush. YOU, sir, are in the minority.

29 posted on 11/29/2010 7:25:35 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA
Bush was the worst Republican President that I know of. I will say that to his face.

That's almost too silly to even try to make a comment about.

Other than saying, go ahead and say it to his face. He'll probably smile and say, isn't America great that you have the right to say that to him?

He's a good man, and he will be remembered as a strong President.

30 posted on 11/29/2010 7:28:26 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA

Thats ridiculous.


31 posted on 11/29/2010 7:29:34 AM PST by John W (Natural-born US citizen since 1955)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA

“Bush was the worst Republican President that I know of. I will say that to his face”

Not quite, his old man was the worst. Any sitting president that only gets 38% of the vote at reelection proves that the American people agree. No more Bushes, we won’t be fooled again. W stands for wimp.

That said, I did vote for them but look at what the alternatives were.


32 posted on 11/29/2010 7:29:53 AM PST by jubail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb
Predictable. Funny. And sad at the same time, Deb.

(They really DO think they're the majority!)

33 posted on 11/29/2010 7:29:53 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: unspun

“Ad hominem is the sign of a failed argument (which is ironic, since the charge is “ignorance”).”

The only irony is that someone as ignorant as you thinks they are conservative...W is one of the most conservative presidents we have had. What part of private ownership, reduced taxes, right to life, free trade, etc. etc. etc. do you not get? The man liberated over 50 million people, saved millions of lives in Africa, fought for the sanctity of life at every step. Tried to save retirements for people...wonder where you were on that one. Probably crying about privatizing social security. He did not spend the money, your congressman did...W had a real plateful to deal with and needed congress to work with him...reality is a hard thing to grasp sometimes but for Pete’s sake at least make some kind of intellectual attempt.


34 posted on 11/29/2010 7:32:29 AM PST by Wpin ("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Especially considering your ad hominem, strawman post to which I was responding.

How was calling someone a "Bush Lover" ad hominem? I would think that's simply accurate? Or, are you offended by being known as a Bush lover?

35 posted on 11/29/2010 7:32:45 AM PST by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jubail
W stands for wimp.

Wow. That's even sillier than the post about his being the worst.

Is is a contest to see who can make the dumbest comment about President Bush?

Is there a prize?? LOL!

36 posted on 11/29/2010 7:34:29 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

I’d ask Bush why he let the border and the nation go to hell in the service of the left and why he maintained the traitorous Kosovo policy of Clinton’s -— that of creating another Islamic narco terror state in Europe.

I echo other conservatives -— no more Bushes — ever.


37 posted on 11/29/2010 7:34:29 AM PST by eleni121 (http://www.serfes.org/orthodox/memoryof.htm Father Daniil Sysoyev lives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

“btw, your premise that Bush led us to Obama is highly flawed and not backed up by historical fact.

Oh, yes it is. You just don’t want to believe it.”

So, are you saying that Bush made you vote and campaign for Obama? What ignorance is expounded here against Bush, it is like the lemmings come out from under their rocks to spew some stupid remarks and then they go back under their rocks hiding from the reality that it is their fault, not Bush’s for what has happened to this country.


38 posted on 11/29/2010 7:34:35 AM PST by Wpin ("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
I'm offended only by ad hominems reducing the genuine and deserved respect and admiration (of millions) to foolish idolatry.

Evasion is not our friend ray. Everyone who read your post on both sides of the Bush question knew what you meant.

Besides which, if you call "Bush hater" an ad hominem, then "Bush lover" is equally an ad hominem.

And all I was doing was responding to your gratuitous and stupid original statement.

So in any case, you are guilty and lose the argument.

39 posted on 11/29/2010 7:38:52 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: codercpc

You forgot barf alert! He screwed conservatives and now we have Obama. Thanks Bush you are a Genius! (sarcasm off)


40 posted on 11/29/2010 7:39:09 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wpin
It's groupthink, Wpin.

I think they actually believe they're 'cool' when they say these stupid things.

Like they get a reward from the Bush-hating-bad-boys standing on the corner with cigarettes rolled up in their T shirt sleeves. ;)

41 posted on 11/29/2010 7:46:06 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

Thank you for sitting through the constant interviews, listening to every word. You’re listening, but you’re bashing those who listen.

This is how the liberals operate - hating Fox News, for example, while watching Fox News around the clock.

Bring back George Bush. Clarity. He never called Americans the enemy.


42 posted on 11/29/2010 7:51:33 AM PST by swpa_mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Wpin
So, are you saying that Bush made you vote and campaign for Obama?

No, not me - but millions of others.

If Bush was so good why did so many switch to Obama?

Bush's "compassionate conservatism" was simply liberalism lite and people said, "If it was okay for the leader of the GOP it must be okay to be liberal." If you can't see that then you remain blind by choice.

43 posted on 11/29/2010 7:51:52 AM PST by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
I'm going to take a shot at this one. As the mother of a new voter, I will tell you that on campuses all around this country, Obama was seen as “cool”. I mean, the guy had a blackberry, he obviously works out and he could read that teleprompter like no other. In addition, those same kids on college campuses really thought a republican president would bring back the draft, thanks to what they read on the net and heard from some of their cult heroes.

As far as the adults who voted for a far left President with absolutely no experience, you witnessed the power of the media. Akin to Jim Jones. He promised his flock the promised land, too. Yes we can. When you attack people as this media attacked the republican candidate, at some point, many of the weaker people lose sight of the goal of saving the country and just vote for the cool people. Mistakes were made. The election three weeks ago started to correct that disastrous mistake.

44 posted on 11/29/2010 7:59:52 AM PST by swpa_mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
If Bush was so good why did so many switch to Obama?

You're badly conflating issues ray, and ignoring the obvious historical facts to promote your anti-Bush emotional theory.

The reason the most Americans forgot that Bush was indeed good, was because he was battered and lied about day in and day out for 8 years by a hateful media.

At the same time they were slobbering over, worshipping and lying about Obama. (And in case you forgot, the alternative was McCain, who was beating up Bush almost as badly as Obama was).

It is you who remain 'blind by choice,' as is evidenced by this weak and spurious argument.

45 posted on 11/29/2010 8:01:02 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: swpa_mom
I understand your points. I agree to a certain extent.

Being the "mother of new voter" can you tell me what you pointed to about Bush's presidency, and his actions, that you used to convince the "new voter" that voting for McCain, or any other GOP candidate, was the right choice?

Sure, Bush is for some conservative ideas but his inability to sell conservatism (because I don't think he actually believes in it) is what hurt conservatism more than what he did. IOW, it was more what he didn't do than what he did vis-a-vis conservatism that led to Obama.

Look at the first two years of the GOP Congress that he presided over. What were his major concerns? Immigration, No Child Left Behind (massive intrusion of the Dept of Ed in our lives), Drugs for seniors (another massive increase in the govt.)

He pushed the Patriot Act which was basically written by Biden. Bush played with the liberal establishment instead of fighting them. One only has to look at his vetoes to see he NEVER put a stop to the massive growth of govt.

46 posted on 11/29/2010 8:20:49 AM PST by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA
- he did not manage/control/attack the financial situation BEFORE it wound up being a crisis in 2007/8, leaving a WIDE GAPING HOLE for Obama to jump through.

I, and others, suspect that there was a deliberate strategy from the Left to tank the US economy.

New Agency Proposed to Oversee Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae (NYT article September 11, 2003)

The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago.

Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the two largest players in the mortgage lending industry.

The new agency would have the authority, which now rests with Congress, to set one of the two capital-reserve requirements for the companies. It would exercise authority over any new lines of business. And it would determine whether the two are adequately managing the risks of their ballooning portfolios.

The plan is an acknowledgment by the administration that oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- which together have issued more than $1.5 trillion in outstanding debt -- is broken. A report by outside investigators in July concluded that Freddie Mac manipulated its accounting to mislead investors, and critics have said Fannie Mae does not adequately hedge against rising interest rates...

''These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis,'' said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ''The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.''

Representative Melvin L. Watt, Democrat of North Carolina, agreed.

''I don't see much other than a shell game going on here, moving something from one agency to another and in the process weakening the bargaining power of poorer families and their ability to get affordable housing,'' Mr. Watt said...

Louis Freah and Jamie Gorelick just happen to move from botching national security to becoming experts in the banking industry? And the Jamie moves on to negotiate BP's surrender to Lord Obama?


47 posted on 11/29/2010 8:29:30 AM PST by a fool in paradise (The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Sure, Bush is for some conservative ideas but his inability to sell conservatism (because I don't think he actually believes in it) is what hurt conservatism more than what he did. IOW, it was more what he didn't do than what he did vis-a-vis conservatism that led to Obama.

Flip the worldview and look at the other side of the aisle.

While Barack Obama has not delivered on enough things (ending don't ask don't tell, amnesty for illegals, closing Gitmo "for real", getting out of Afghanistan, single payer medical system ONLY...), they still see headway being made on advancing their socialist agenda and see plenty of fellow travellers in his administration (who unfortunately get outted for spouting Marxist crap).

I don't think you will find any red diaper doper babies saying that Barack is "sullying" what it means to be a liberal. They just deny he's a liberal at all and tag him as "center-right" (for remaining engaged in Afghanistan).

48 posted on 11/29/2010 8:33:13 AM PST by a fool in paradise (The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

As I noted, DELUSIONAL!


49 posted on 11/29/2010 8:39:38 AM PST by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
The media and left lied and belittled Bush for 8 years

And he never fought back. Why?

The media lied about Iraq for 6 years

And the White House didn't try very hard to counter those lies.

The media overblew Republican "scandals" and ignored Democrat crimes

Yep, and once again the GOP didn't fight back.

There was a Democrat caused economic crash, conveniently timed right before the election to do the most damage

So, either Bush and the GOP were part of it, or they ignored what was happening. Which is worse?

BTW, Bush allowed Chris Cox to eliminate the uptick rule on short selling which turned out to be a major part of the problem. It gave Soros and his players the ability to initiate the damage.

McCain, as a candidate, stank

I bet you voted for him anyway, didn't you? (As did I).

McCain is a RINO without principle

Yep.

McCain campaigned against Bush but refused to campaign against Obama

So? What does that have to do with Bush's record?

The media lied and exalted Obama

Yep.

The American people were stupid enough to believe the garbage Obama was spouting

True. But, what did Bush do as a conservative president to disallow those ideas. How, in eight years, did Bush enact and therefore provide, an alternative to the liberal policies?

The youth of America voted for an American Idol and not a candidate

Yep.

Everyone, including RINO Republicans refused to admit that Obama was a radical

Including Bush, BTW.

Billions of illegal foreign dollars were spent on electing Obama

Not one cry of "foul" from the president of the United States or his DOJ on that, was there?

50 posted on 11/29/2010 8:41:31 AM PST by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson