Ohio pediatricians voice ‘disgust’ as partial birth abortion ‘inventor’ moves in next door

LifeSiteNews ^ | 11/29/10 | Kathleen Gilbert

[Inclines to the Right]

If it can happen in Chattanooga (and 1500 other mills), it can happen in Sharonville.....I’ll be happy to assist when it’s time! :) What a great party for pro-lifers when Haskell surrenders.

[Faith]

Operation Rescue reports that another mill of Haskell’s, located in Dayton, ran afoul of the law by refusing to comply with state law that required abortion clinics to be licensed as ambulatory surgical centers and have a transfer agreement with a local hospital. After years of legal wrangling, the state capitulated and granted Haskell a “variance” that allows him to operate without meeting the legal requirements that bind other clinics.

Once again, judicial activism allowed the twisting of the law so that babies can be sacrificed.

[workerbee]

Haskell is perhaps best known for his claim - believed to be false - that he invented the gruesome and now illegal partial-birth abortion procedure.

What kind of sick freak would want to lay claim to such a barbaric procedure? I mean, why not declare that you celebrate the birthday of Vlad the Impaler while you're at it?

[Las Vegas Dave]

Ohio Pings!

To be added to the Ohio Ping List, please freepmail (works best),
LasVegasDave.

[xzins]

Thanks, Dave. May God stop this abomination on the northern side of Cincinnati.

[MsLady]

I’ve heard that before and she’s right. Thinking about what our country has done over the past almost 40 years the slaughter of innocent babies, makes me physically sick.

[Wile E Coyote Genius]

You know what wagglebee this could be a good thing. Really! Maybe if we pray hard the women will go into Dr. Steve Brinn office by mistake and not Martin Haskell’s! Think about it! With God all things are possible!

[trisham]

bump!

[Notwithstanding]

• Reporter: What led you to develop D & X [dilation and extraction or "partial-birth abortion"]?
  Haskell: D & E's [dilation and evacuation], the procedure typically used for later abortions, have always been somewhat problematic because of the toughness and development of the fetal tissues. . . I just kept doing D & Es because that was what I was comfortable with, up until 24 weeks. But they were very tough. Sometimes it was a 45-minute operation. I noticed that some of the later D & Es were very, very easy. . . You see the easy ones would have a foot length presentation, you'd reach up and grab the foot of the fetus, pull the fetus down and the head would hang up and then you would collapse the head and take it out. It was easy. . . Then I said, `Well gee, if I just put the ultrasound up there I could see it all and I wouldn't have to feel around for it.' I did that and sure enough, I found it 99 percent of the time. Kind of serendipity.
  • Martin Haskell, discussing the invention of his late-term abortion method, Cincinnati Medicine, Fall 1993 (U.S. Congressional Record, 1996, p. H10614)

• Reporter: [Is] the fetus . . . dead beforehand...?
  Haskell: No, it's really not. . . in my case, I would think probably about a third of those are definitely. . . dead before I actually start to remove the fetus. And probably the other two-thirds are not.
  Reporter: Is the skull procedure also done to make sure that the fetus is dead so you're not going to have the problem of a live birth?
  Haskell: It's immaterial. If you can't get it out, you can't get it out. . . The point here is to effect a safe legal abortion. I mean, you could say the same thing about the D&E [dilation and evacuation] procedure. You know, why do you do the D&E procedure? Why do you crush the fetus up inside the womb? To kill it before you take it out? Well, that happens, yes. But that's not why you do it. You do it to get it out. I could do the same thing with a D&E procedure...But that's not really the point. The point here is you're attempting to do an abortion. And that's the goal of your work, is to complete an abortion. . .
  Reporter: I wanted to make sure I have both you and (Dr.) McMahon saying 'No' then. That this is misinformation, these letters to the editor saying it's only done when the baby's already dead, in case of fetal demise and you have to do an autopsy. But some of them are saying they're getting that information from NAF [National Abortion Federation]. Have you talked to Barbara Radford or anyone over there?
  Haskell: Well, I had heard that they were giving that information, somebody over there might be giving information like that out. The people that staff the NAF office are not medical people. And many of them when I gave my paper, many of them came in, I learned later, to watch my paper because many of them have never seen an abortion performed of any kind.
  Reporter: Did you also show a video when you did that?
  Haskell: Yeah. I taped a procedure a couple of years ago, a very brief video, that simply showed the technique. The old story about a picture's worth a thousand words.
  Reporter: As National Right to Life will tell you.
  Haskell: Afterwards they were just amazed. They just had no idea. And here they're rabid supporters of abortion. They work in the office there. And...some of them have never seen one performed...And I'll be quite frank: most of my abortions are elective in that 20-24 week range...In my particular case, probably 20% are for genetic reasons. And the other 80% are purely elective...
  • Martin Haskell, explaining how his late-term abortion method is used to effect safe abortions, to American Medical News (U.S. Congressional Record, 1996, p. H2919)