Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EdLake
It goes back to the Biological and Toxic Weapons Convention in July, where the U.S. government walked out because they didn't want inspections.

Agreed. But my point was "why Hatfill and not Ivins?"

She contacted people she knew, and Hatfill's name came up. He had worked at Ft. Detrick, and he had been featured in some article about how bioweapons can be cooked up at home.

So it looks like it was just that he was the first one to fit some assumptions and suspicions...and she stuck with it.

IIRC, she claimed never to have fingered him by name, yet she did claim at one point to have pushed the FBI.

What's she up to these days...any idea?

50 posted on 11/30/2010 8:25:07 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Gondring
"What's she up to these days...any idea?"

She was in her 70's when the anthrax attacks occurred. That means she's in her 80's now. What do people in their 80's usually do? If she's still working, she's teaching at a college in upstate New York.

I think she focused on Hatfill because he was a flamboyant character, a blow-hard, and there were rumors that he worked for the CIA in Africa, where there was a major anthrax outbreak at one time - when Hatfill was in Africa.

Rosbenberg never apologized to Hatfill. She stated that, if Hatfill was innocent, then it's the FBI's fault for investigating him, not hers.

Ed at www.anthraxinvestigation.com

57 posted on 12/01/2010 7:23:17 AM PST by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson