Skip to comments.WikiLeaks: Interpol issues wanted notice for Julian Assange
Posted on 11/30/2010 2:56:48 PM PST by La Enchiladita
click here to read article
I doubt any of the unsavory shenanigans gleaned from the document dump represents significant news or intel to the involved nations.
Retaliation that affects innocent individuals and groups is my greatest concern.
The Russians don't extradite - they exterminate.
I would bet his days are numbered. No biggie.
Revel, you’re a fine writer, with very well thought out conclusions, but you really ought to nail down the differences between “there”, “they’re”, and “their”.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
Amazing, eight months after the first dump, he's wanted on an interpol warrant for sex crimes. Eric the Holder is in Europe, forgot where, pitching the good old USA for the 2022 World Cup. Nothing else going on, I guess. Certainly nothing criminal.
Here’s my take and I don’t think this is far-fetched.
Soros is involved with Wikileaks Assange.
Note that Wiki is calling for Hillary to resign...hmmm, eliminate her for 2012 election?
No negative stuff released on Obama.
Obama dictator for life?
I said “hi!” to him at a 7-11 just the other day!
Anyone want to start a pool on when they think this guy goes room temp? I’ll start the festivities with a guess of April 3, 2011.
Good one, Ron.
Obviously, if a warrant by interpol has been issued.
Yes- one of my weakest points.
IF better prepare himself for eternity...
He better prepare himself for eternity...
Actually he is wanted for questioning. He has not even been charged. That also means that the EU warrant and Interpol warrant are not supportable.
Not defending him, but facts matter.
It's a setup. He is single, met a woman, had consensual sex with her. A few days later, met another woman, had consensual sex with her.
Woman #2 gets together with woman #1 and they decide that he didn't wait long enough between them - therefore he was operating under false pretenses with both of them, and therefore, the false pretenses equal rape.
Even better, the woman who started the whole thing, woman #2, is a known intelligence operative.
I find it hard to believe this little twerp raped 2 women. I think it is more likely that some intelligence service set up a “honey pot” - 2 women who approached him for a 3-way, and then afterwards they filed rape charges against him.
Assange does not work alone.
He is just the public sphere clown sent out to be a jester on stage.
Wikileaks will continue with or without Assange.
The average schmucks in the world will briefly be forced to have the blinders removed from their eyes and see the second and third layer of world stage political power.
And just like that, they will recoil in horror that their worldviews shaped by generations of utter and total bullshit are complete fabrications derived to hold thehm in servitude from cradle to grave.
And they will get mad, real real mad, at the court jester who told them the Emperors have no clothes.
And the emperors will rejoice in using their jester as a foil to further fractionalize the world’s population of schmucks into smaller and smaller subclassifications of worker bees.
Let me ask you hondact200, how many hours have you spent today reading the original source material cables before attacking trapped_in_LA ?
You know what my people were asking today... why the fuck after we lost high school friends on 9/11 did our friends go to Iraq and Afghanistan and get injured and another high school buddy died there in a goatherder’s holding pen... for what?
Most people you have to understand are sheeple. They cannot weigh the good and the bad when it is being pounded in there ear that it is all bad. It was decided here by most to consider only the bad and to take this guy out without prejudice. Only those people cant see they are empowering the all powerful big brother in the process. They are taking out there only chance to see through the veil of propaganda and protect there own freedom. And that is the power of sheepelism. One goes Bahhhh, and all the rest follow without thought.
Unfortunately, I agree. Everyone is just jumping on the bandwagon without thinking. It will be harder to deny the Iranian nuclear threat now for example. We are again reminded about our "friend" Saudi Arabia also.
Make no mistake, there will be a knee jerk reaction. We are already seeing it. Government will use this "leak" of relatively low level material to try and gain more power over the internet.
Assange might want ask those pirates the Russians let go...how they were treated.
He’s wanted for a sex offense?
Don’t megalomaniacs, by definition, want to rule the world?
How then can he be a megalomaniac?
I think he’s a plant
Sort of like a family member coming to Thanksgiving Dinner and opening his mouth at the table and telling all gossip from family members about other family members. It causes ciaos in a family. Well in this situation it can cause ciaos in the world... very very dangerous.
Yeah, but what do you get in Europe for sex crimes. Probably 3-6 months for rape.
BS.. he is a known gay.
>>I dont understand why most people here hate this guy. Hes exposing the governments unsavory deeds and thus helping to shrink the government which is what most conservatives want, right?
>You’re being sarcastic, right? Either that, or you’re a RonPaulbutt. If you don’t like the U.S. of A., buddy, get out.
WTF? Why are you being so harsh & unsavory La Enchiladita?
The question of whether or not I like the “U.S. of A.” can be answered by the answer to this question:
—Is the US about Truth and Justice?
Can you with any integrity say that the Government actively strives to ensure any 5 of the 10 amendments in the Bill of Rights is upheld? Any 4? Any 3? How about two?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right
of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the
Government for a redress of grievances.
Hate speech crimes?
Politically unsavory news access [FOX news or “alternative media”] to the press?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of
a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,
shall not be infringed.
TSA flight restrictions?
Federal building restrictions?
Military base restrictions?
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any
house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of
war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Actually I can’t think of an instance of this amendment being violated...
but it may when we get that nifty Civilian Security Force!!
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and
seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue,
but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation,
and particularly describing the place to be searched,
and the persons or things to be seized.
So, “probable cause” that a warrant may issue by is the same thing as a warrant? [Listen to any police officer mention probable cause.]
No-Knock warrants are reasonable?
SWAT raids are reasonable?
Border patrol checkpoints, 100 mi in, are reasonable?
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise
infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of
a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval
forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of
War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for
the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb;
nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness
against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of law; nor shall private property be
taken for public use, without just compensation.
I’m really glad that this amendment prevented bailout recipient CEOs to not answer for an infamous crime because they weren’t presented by a grand jury... oh, wait, Congress can just make people answer for whatever they want!
I’m so glad this amendment makes it impossible for the government to take my land and give it to some other private entity... oh, wait, there’s Keelo v. New England. Never mind.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the
right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of
the State and district wherein the crime shall have been
committed, which district shall have been previously
ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and
cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses
against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses
in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel
for his defence.
Speedy trial! Now that’s a good joke!
I’m sure glad that in criminal trials I have the right “to be confronted with the witnesses against him”... oh, wait, I forgot about red-light cameras*.
*If you’re saying that such are CIVIL cases, then why does “Law Enforcement” give you a Citation?
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy
shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be
preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined
in any Court of the United States, than according
to the rules of the common law.
Man! I sure am glad that the GM stock holders-could have a jury-trial regarding the breach-of-contract... oh, wait...
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines
imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Televised. Obama. Speeches. ;)
But man, I sure am glad this amendment exists and I can’t be thrown in jail for transporting personal weapons and ammo through another state... Oh, right, that NJ guy & his 7yr sentence.
Traffic fines in a ‘construction zone’.
Traffic fines in a ‘construction zone’ that lies within a ‘school zone.’
Being interested in the second amendment.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights,
shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained
by the people.
I sure am glad that the government wouldn’t ever think about regulating gardens... oh, wait.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution,
nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to
the States respectively, or to the people.
Oh, you mean like DETERMINING IF YOUR STATE WILL ACKNOWLEDGE SAME-SEX ‘UNIONS’? Man, I sure am glad a federal judge can’t step into that!
Oh, what about a state determining that NONE OF ITS JUDGES MAY USE SHARIA? Surely that’s reserved to the state or people?
That made me chuckle...
Will the Ruskies hire the Wicked Witch of the West to sky-write your suggestion overhead Assange's safehouse?
Oh, I think every would-be anarchist leaker will get the Ruskie's message loud and clear without that.
Would be a nice touch though.
He should be so lucky as to get the same treatment. I think his experience with the Russians will end a bit more abruptly.
I think Obama is actually enjoying this. He is instinctively for anything that can paint a negative picture of America.
Will anybody be held responsible for not terminating the security clearence and net admin rights of an E-3 who was busted for assault?
could some of these “leaks” be coming from obama himself ? .... he certainly fits the profile of a “wikileaker”
We let him go. One mile above Siberia.
Former military people understand that ‘what’ is leaked has future implications, and the names of those who gave us information is in some of the documents. It puts those foreign sources lives in danger, and prevents others from giving our operatives further information....information that might stop a terrorist attack.
Lives are at stake, and conversations that might offend those the US has taken years to establish dipolomatic relations with ....are in those documents, that are leaked, and probably far worse documents are available; and the Pentagon is holding it’s breath the wrong one isn’t leaked that could start a war!
So far most of it was suspected or at least known, that is except for the insults. And the HOPES of getting more Intelligence is damaged for some time. Who will trust a country who can’t protect it’s secrets from world publication. A terrorist plan might be missed now, because of Wikileaks, and our sources will be afraid to talk to our operatives around the world.
There is a good reason for security clearances and ‘a need to know’ basis, that far left liberal democrats have been ignoring the past few decades, or more. Fools.
“I dont understand why most people here hate this guy. Hes exposing the governments unsavory deeds.”
If he had been whistle-blowing on something truly unsavory (Hillary plotting to invade Estonia to seize their sugar mines, etc.) there wouldn´t be much hate.
As it is, he dumps hundreds of thousands of documents that should be secret (according to law) regardless of the “size of government”, merely out of malice and misguided principle, in order to harm primarily the US.
I dunno. I am in Sweden right now, and the women involved are flaming feminists and lefties. I´d say it´s more of a case of the dangers of having sex in left wing circles (in this case with the women who invited him to lecture at Broderskapsrörelsen* - you never know when you end up in bed with a raving feminist.
Of course, I don´t know exactly what transpired (for obvious reasons), but I do suspect poor A getting a bad rap here.
*A Swedish formerly “christian socialist” (a contradiction in terms) organization, now more geared towards the promotion of Islam.
“Who will trust a country who cant protect its secrets from world publication. A terrorist plan might be missed now, because of Wikileaks, and our sources will be afraid to talk to our operatives around the world.”
Who would trust ANY nation? You’d have to be a fool and most of these guys aren’t fools, they’ve got some thing that they think they’re going to get out of it. WikiLeak has just reminded them that the risks might be a bit higher than they thought so yes it will reduce our ability to get this type of information and increase the chance that we’ll have a few more successful terrorist attacks. The one to blame for this though is not the WikiLeader but the guy that is feeding him information and the US for not protecting this information. Who is going to trust a country that is this sloppy when it comes to protecting this kind of information?
As far as this starting a war? Please, nations don’t start wars because of this type of crap. Oh they may use this as an excuse but the real reasons are much more mundane like do I think I can win against so and so. Or how much land/stuff does he have that I want. Then they start looking for an excuse, any will do but this won’t be the real cause of something like that.
Earlier this month, Assange, from Melbourne, was facing charges of rape and molestation over a recent trip to Stockholm, Sweden. The rape charges have since been dropped by Swedish prosecutors but the molestation accusation is still outstanding.
British newspaper the Daily Mail has obtained a copy of the police statements made by the two women at the centre of the claims. These indicate that Assange had consensual sex with the women but was reported to police after he refused to use a condom or, later, take an STD test.
One, Anna Ardin, who helped bring Assange to Sweden for a speaking engagement, allegedly let Assange stay in her one-bedroom flat in Stockholm. They went out to dinner and, according to a “police source” quoted in the Daily Mail, “when they got back they had sexual relations, but there was a problem with the condom - it had split”.
I personally have a tempered feeling about him. I see that he is doing some unjust harm, and I don’t like that. But I also see your argument which is also true much of the time, and it that regard he is doing a good thing.What did it for me was when he published the clear names of countless Afghans who informed on the Taliban invaders. They are getting their throats cut, and this arrogant little bastard just shrugs it off. He deserves a bullet in the neck for that one alone.
Cabby AZ | December 1, 2010 at 12:45 am | SueK 10:18 PM
I believe that Barky and his master (Soros) gave the OK. How could they not have? Assange made his intentions known well in advance of the release and these wackaloons did nothing? Sorry, but this doesnt pass the smell test.
I couldnt agree more with that and think that many folks feel the same way. It is all just too fishy. Boy, they think we are a bunch of dumb-bunnies.
WikiLeaks was a BO False Flag Op from the beginning. WikiLeaks trashes President Bush and the repubs in advance of the 2010 election, then trashes HC in advance of the 2012 primary. In hundreds of thousands of Wikileaks, there is no mention of BOs BC, passports, muslim faith etc., how much more obvious that BO is behind WikiLeaks does it need to be?
That won't be a problem. All that's needed is a Geiger counter.
You can take a hike too, buddy.
And take Glenn Beck with you.
>And take Glenn Beck with you.
I didn’t reference Glenn Beck at all.
Eye am vary week in the area of homonyms myself.
Julian Assange was born 3 July 1971 - when Jim died