Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Next step for tight security could be trains, boats, metro
The Hill ^ | 11/23/10 02:09 PM ET | Jordy Yager

Posted on 12/01/2010 2:16:07 AM PST by TheGoodBoy

The next step in tightened security could be on U.S. public transportation, trains and boats.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: homeland; scanners; security; tsa; tsapervs; veryoldnews
This is getting a little wild no?
1 posted on 12/01/2010 2:16:11 AM PST by TheGoodBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy

“If You Have Nothing To Hide You Have Nothing To Fear!”


2 posted on 12/01/2010 2:28:09 AM PST by Eyes Unclouded ("The word bipartisan means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out." -George Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy
"Your papers! Schnell!"
3 posted on 12/01/2010 2:29:59 AM PST by Slings and Arrows (You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy

If we deported the Muslims, cracked down on illegal immigration, and closed mosques nationwide - we wouldn’t have to spend and waste such large amounts of funds trying to combat a a problem that will only find and infiltrate their way into committing future terrorist acts on US soil...

Washington’s approach is not to treat the flu - but to duct tape the mouth and nose shut and hope nothing escapes...

Makes perfect sense!


4 posted on 12/01/2010 2:33:27 AM PST by BCW (http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy

5 posted on 12/01/2010 2:36:04 AM PST by BCW (http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

6 posted on 12/01/2010 2:37:10 AM PST by BCW (http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BCW

7 posted on 12/01/2010 2:38:43 AM PST by BCW (http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy

In light of the recent indecency of, ahem, “examinations,” I don’t think it’s wise to use the word “tight” in conjunction with the word “security.”


8 posted on 12/01/2010 2:39:15 AM PST by sayuncledave (A cruce salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCW

Trying to insert this pic - without success...
http://www.fast-rewind.com/pix/topsecret4.jpg


9 posted on 12/01/2010 2:40:12 AM PST by BCW (http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Ihre papiere bitte...


10 posted on 12/01/2010 2:47:36 AM PST by BigCinBigD (Northern flags in South winds flutter...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
"Your papers! Schnell!"

--------------------------

The Socialists know what they are doing. And many of us know what the Left is about. But what Republican politician will announce it? Obama's police state will pretty much destroy our American way of life, the economy, and liberty before the 2012 election. His goal is to control every aspect of life, food, credit, and the pursuit of happiness.

Think of how many more people the TSA will have to hire to pat down and scan people at train and bus stations, malls, grocery stores, sports competitions (little league on up), Walmart and Target, churches and synagogues (but not mosques), and anywhere else large numbers of people congregate.

How many more freedoms will Zer0 usurp?

When the foreign occupier employed the phrase 'fundamentally transforming America' two years ago, that's precisely what he meant. Zer0 has no intention of going quietly.

TSA-13sm

11 posted on 12/01/2010 2:50:45 AM PST by BobP (hat about the pensions and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy

Why do people only post one sentence, so that as soon as you click into the FR details, you have to click again to go offsite? Is this a legal restriction?


12 posted on 12/01/2010 3:09:43 AM PST by Old_Grouch (63 and AARP-free. Monthly FR contributor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old_Grouch

I didn’t want to run afoul of excerpting limits. Also I figured that the source had the guts to write this story so they should get clicks.


13 posted on 12/01/2010 3:35:01 AM PST by TheGoodBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BobP
You really think TSA will be patting down people in subways and such? I can just see some perverts impersonating TSA agents.

I think they would put the scanners everywhere. From a healthy "got Milk?" we'll go to an unhealthy "got Scanned?" Have you had your daily gov required dose? The Cancer society must be promoting the scanners.

Meanwhile, I see no purpose in "Papers please!" What good are they? illegals can use any SSN, birth certificates are forged. Those papers meant something during the Hitler era. Now it's junk.

14 posted on 12/01/2010 3:35:30 AM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy
The next step in tightened security could be on U.S. public transportation, trains and boats.

And the next step is to curtail travel by all means. No papers, no travel.

15 posted on 12/01/2010 3:53:47 AM PST by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCW

Good bait attempt, but no such luck. This issue has nothing to do with any religion.

This issue is about self-respect and dignity, and the lack thereof of a people that allow themselves to get turned into farm animals. That’s kind of how I see it.

I’m not in the USA, I’m currently working in India. I never imagined I’d see the day americans became cattle - felt up, irradiated. What’s next? Milked, sterilized, tagged, etc?


16 posted on 12/01/2010 4:01:22 AM PST by TheGoodBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

Who will carry out this security? TSA?

I’m sure that will make SEIU VERY happy. Isn’t TSA going to unionize?

Well, Obama DID promise that...
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Barack_Obama%27s_Letter_to_John_Gage_regarding_the_Transportation_Security_Administration

Obama also promised to paint this nation purple with the SEIU.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_66K0FNI-k&NR=1 (I suggest watching all of it, but Obama’s at 1:34) notice his ‘dilect’ hahaha

All Obama’s promises wouldn’t be complete without promising SEIU some fresh blood with reform of immigration laws.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AK7K0itgQt0

If not a unionized TSA doing the new security, how about Securitas AB/Securitas Security Services USA.

A Swedish company that swallowed up many smaller companies world wide, like Pinkerton and Burns security (here)
The billionaire that owns this is Gustaf Douglas through his company Latour— he and his partner have done this with construction(Skanska) and locks(Assa Abloy) , too.

Securitas conveniently hooked up with SEIU over this bit:
http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweekly/2010/02/15-year-old_girl_beaten_while.php

“The SEIU quickly jumped on the opportunity to try and take advantage of a poor ‘security’ policy by taking over security in general.[6] The Seattle Times reported, “The Service Employees International Union Local 6 issued a statement Wednesday framing the attack as a reason SEIU should represent the Olympic guards. It already represents Securitas.”
http://www.conservapedia.com/SEIU

another: http://www.sanfranciscosentinel.com/?p=36551

What about this Obama promise...

“President-elect Barack Obama has pledged to change the way Washington works and curb the influence of lobbyists,” said Podesta in the transition team statement.

“During the campaign, federal lobbyists could not contribute to or raise money for the campaign...the president-elect is taking those commitments even further by announcing the strictest, and most far reaching ethics rules of any transition team in history.”
http://rss.msnbc.msn.com/id/27665871/

What in the sam-hill is Obama if not a community organizer/lobbyist himself, should he have excluded HIMSELF from the Presidency? I think so.


17 posted on 12/01/2010 4:07:34 AM PST by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BCW

The link to the picture doesn’t work.
Got a link to the site the picture is on?
Perhaps I can post it.


18 posted on 12/01/2010 4:10:29 AM PST by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy
Next step for tight security could be trains, boats, metro

Elect a "Barack Hussein Obama" and these are the consequences.

19 posted on 12/01/2010 4:10:53 AM PST by snowsislander (Chicago-style politics at a national level is a national disgrace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy


20 posted on 12/01/2010 4:23:16 AM PST by pookie18 (Palin/Cheney '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy

I’ll go with “tagged” for $200, Alex.


21 posted on 12/01/2010 4:37:23 AM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy

And after those modes of transportation are covered under the government’s “security umbrella,” will come security checks for those choosing to transport via car, motorcycle, moped, scooter, or bicycle.


22 posted on 12/01/2010 4:44:31 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Walking is next. Then skipping...maybe strolling.


23 posted on 12/01/2010 4:47:27 AM PST by hal ogen (1st Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy

The next step could be entrances to malls, restaurants...


24 posted on 12/01/2010 5:10:37 AM PST by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Yes, and all in the name of keeping us safer.
Wide open borders.
Millions of illegal aliens.
What a farce.


25 posted on 12/01/2010 5:22:28 AM PST by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy

If Obama and his elite crew had their way - and they are trying hard to get it - yes - they would milk us and decide who could have babies and who could not...becuase they know best!


26 posted on 12/01/2010 5:29:36 AM PST by BCW (http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy

This is big pay off for Obama’s big bud and owner.


27 posted on 12/01/2010 6:37:36 AM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy
Next step for tight security could be trains, boats, metro

Perhaps if they devoted more effort controlling our borders there would be less need to tighten security on trains, boats, and metros.

28 posted on 12/01/2010 6:42:08 AM PST by MosesKnows (Love many, Trust few, and always paddle your own canoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCW
"yes - they would milk us and decide who could have babies and who could not...becuase they know best!"

...oh and they would tell us when to have babies, and what gender... and then what color eyes are allowed....

29 posted on 12/01/2010 7:51:56 AM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy
This idea is stuck in a New York state of mind. In NY the sheeple are comprehensively disarmed. In much of the rest of the USA concealed carry permits are the norm.

It is *not* against the law to take a public bus while carrying in many states. So, what's the TSA going to do when they find strapped passengers? Check their papers and let them go I guess? (And does the TSA even have the power of purely local modes of transport like this?)

30 posted on 12/01/2010 8:16:42 AM PST by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy

Well, if you don’t want to be groped, you can always walk!


31 posted on 12/01/2010 10:43:59 AM PST by zeugma (Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheGoodBoy

OK, I guess that makes some sense.


32 posted on 12/01/2010 3:32:42 PM PST by Old_Grouch (63 and AARP-free. Monthly FR contributor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson