Skip to comments.
EPA Shifting Its Emphasis to ‘Sustainability’
Cybercast News Service ^
| 12/2/10
| Susan Jones
Posted on 12/02/2010 8:11:46 AM PST by Nachum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
1
posted on
12/02/2010 8:11:52 AM PST
by
Nachum
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
2
posted on
12/02/2010 8:12:35 AM PST
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Nachum
How did the earth get along all these billions of years without the EPA?
3
posted on
12/02/2010 8:12:56 AM PST
by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: Nachum
The House needs to defund and defang the EPA.
To: Nachum
To: Nachum
The EPA is now all about helping third world countries. There is a heavy emphasis on Africa, but other countries are also in the mix.
Is this why we have an EPA?
Education, EPA, Energy, NPR -- these are the first four parts of government that I would defund 100%.
To: Nachum
Then municipalities double water rates because of shrinking revenues. It happens every time.
Water does not get "used". It's borrowed and returned.
7
posted on
12/02/2010 8:16:05 AM PST
by
blackdog
To: Nachum
“sustainable use of energy, water, materials and land”
The ‘land’ part scares me to death.
8
posted on
12/02/2010 8:17:16 AM PST
by
lacrew
(Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
To: thethirddegree
Like the UN, the EPA has drifted so far from its original mission, it has become a monster.
Also like the UN, it has become the home of ideological bureaucrats with a constant stream of money, searching for a mission.
9
posted on
12/02/2010 8:19:00 AM PST
by
PGR88
To: Nachum
No good can come from this.
What is “sustainable” anyway? I have yet to see agency or anyone actually define it.
10
posted on
12/02/2010 8:19:10 AM PST
by
ProfoundMan
(Time to finish the Reagan Revolution! - RightyPics.com)
To: Nachum
“We have an Environmental Justice court order here to bulldoze your property sir”- Six figure government clerk, 2021.
11
posted on
12/02/2010 8:19:22 AM PST
by
blackdog
To: thethirddegree
The House needs to defund and defang the EPA. They won't. Congress likes these agencies because it allows them to play the almighty and powerful overseer.
12
posted on
12/02/2010 8:20:21 AM PST
by
Dahoser
(Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
To: ProfoundMan
Swimming pool in the back yard, and not a government worker? That's an environmental justice crime!
This stuff is scary.
13
posted on
12/02/2010 8:22:12 AM PST
by
blackdog
To: lacrew
The sustainable growth people basically want everyone to live in urban areas. Detroit, Newark, East St Louis -- in a truly sustainable world, all humans would live in areas like that. The flip side is that the land where people plant gardens, raise chickens, and have access to firewood is considered "unsustainable" and must be depopulated.
It's about Control. Ownership of land gives you too much of it.
To: ConjunctionJunction
It IS Agenda 21. Go to freedom21.org for the counter movement.
“Sustainable development” is nothing less than the state totally controlling everything about your life and property.
15
posted on
12/02/2010 8:22:43 AM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: ProfoundMan
Requiring a definition usually ends any discussion with a leftist,
and it is the reason that they choose forums in which no questions can be asked.
16
posted on
12/02/2010 8:23:48 AM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: ClearCase_guy
To: ProfoundMan
What is “sustainable” anyway? I have yet to see agency or anyone actually define it. "Sustainability" means "whatever leftists think they want at the moment".
This is not to be confused with what leftists said they wanted yesterday or what they'll say they want tomorrow.
They want what they want, they want it now, and if they don't get it the world will end.
This is how things are to be forever.
To: ClearCase_guy
Can I hear a “Soylent Green?”
19
posted on
12/02/2010 8:27:27 AM PST
by
AbolishCSEU
(Percentage of Income in CS is inversely proportionate to Mother's parenting of children)
To: rogue yam
Actually, seriously,
leftists DO derive their power from ambiguity and unequal application of law.
20
posted on
12/02/2010 8:28:57 AM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson