To: onyx
THe SCOTUS should step in immediatly:
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
What part of that is not understood?
8 posted on
12/02/2010 12:24:59 PM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
To: central_va
"What part of that is not understood?"
This part: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state...
We should have a new 2nd amendment that simply states, "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
16 posted on
12/02/2010 12:33:47 PM PST by
ari-freedom
(Happy Chanuka!)
To: central_va
71 posted on
12/02/2010 3:54:45 PM PST by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson