Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leisler
Why did so many non slave owning, and most likely never to be able to own a slave, Southerns fight? Why did so many southern white laborers, in many ways their labor value suppressed by slave labor, why did they support and fight for their state?

Because they were Southron patriots, and because they didn't cotton to a Yankee Army invading their homes and ripping up their institutions?

Any white southern non-slaveholder had a vital interest in containing the violent and potentially violent African population which lived among them. The South did not practice Northern-style segregation. Africans were, at least in the Deep South, everywhere.

The North never gave, and has never given to this day, a coherent theory of race relations (a/k/a "diversity") which could persuade any sentient white Southerner exactly how what would happen AFTER emancipation would or even could be good for him and his family.

The southern white laboring non-slaveholder had every reason to fight.

36 posted on 12/03/2010 5:11:20 AM PST by Jim Noble (It's the tyranny, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble
When I contemplate a situation in which one man owns another man, owns the fruits of that man's labor, and owns that man's descendants in perpetuity, I'm inclined to sympathize with the slave more than with the master.

Guess I'm just a soft headed liberal in that respect....

52 posted on 12/03/2010 7:41:21 AM PST by Notary Sojac (I've been ionized, but I'm okay now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson