Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Path to Obama's Eligibility Goes Through Nancy Pelosi
His Master's Voice | 12/03/10 | HMV

Posted on 12/03/2010 2:57:13 AM PST by Hillary'sMoralVoid

There is only one certain method through which all of the horrors of the Obama Administration can be undone, and that is by proving that Barack Hussein Obama is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States and nullifying his presidency.

The questions and inconsistencies have all been addressed, including such things as place and country of birth, even including inconsistencies regarding which hospital he was born, Obama’s SSN, passport records, and the dearth of personal information that has been made public. There is one person, however, that had to certify his eligibility, and that was Nancy Pelosi. Furthermore, only one state officially certified Obama’s eligibility, and that was Hawaii, unlike previous elections where all states had certified the eligibility of the candidate.

It has become almost self-destructive to attempt to attack Obama directly on his eligibility. The administration and the press corps have automatic responses to belittle anyone that dare question eligibility. To go after Pelosi for negligence and carelessness in failing her responsibility to fully vet the candidate is much more palatable.

The most effective way to do this, in my opinion, is to ask the new House Minority Leader to diffuse all the rumors and innuendo about Obama’s eligibility by answering direct questions about it. Certainly, she should have the answers, shouldn’t she? After all, she was the final arbiter of Obama’s eligibility. Certainly, she could not have left key questions go unanswered, could she?

I believe that if Nancy Pelosi was brought before an investigative committee, the average American would be stunned by her lack of knowledge about the man she certified as eligible to hold the most powerful office in the land. I believe it would become her undoing, and ultimately, Obama’s.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthersgonewild; certifigate; chat; fraud; fraudonamerica; naturalborncitizen; noaccountability; notransparency; pelosi4pelosi; pelosi4syria; treason; treason4samoa; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last

1 posted on 12/03/2010 2:57:17 AM PST by Hillary'sMoralVoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LucyT; SunkenCiv

I don’t know much about HMV, but it’s nice to see the word spreading about this.


2 posted on 12/03/2010 2:59:05 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (George Washington: [Government] is a dangerous servant and a terrible master.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

Oh hi. I thought HMV must be a blog. Sorry, but glad you are thinking about the Pelosi connection.

Why Pelosi Signed Two Certificates of Nomination
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2585683/posts
“Why did the Hawaii Democratic Party refuse to certify Obama’s eligibility?”

Plain Spoken Summary — Certifigate
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2114092/posts?page=186#186

Are ABC, CBS, NBC, FactCheck, and N.Y. Times ‘birthers’ too?

McCain ‘birthers’: ABC, CBS, NBC, FactCheck, N.Y. Times
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=127362
Eligibility issue was huge in 2008 when Obama opponent was focus of attention.


3 posted on 12/03/2010 3:03:54 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (George Washington: [Government] is a dangerous servant and a terrible master.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

Nancy’s certification of Hussein’s eligibility may be a prime reason why he has deferred to her and the House Democrats to develop key legislation.


4 posted on 12/03/2010 3:04:45 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

Simple call in the Delta Force—or some independent and take her to a safe house and waterboard her until she relents—
then burn all contaminated waste-after Congress is presented with evidence It cannot ignore -or refute.And the Pretender is IMPEACHED.Only other option is remain laying on on backs
doing nothing in the supine but wishing someone with a spine and the political will to act will do what we will not.


5 posted on 12/03/2010 3:09:58 AM PST by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

“The questions and inconsistencies have all been addressed, including such things as place and country of birth, even including inconsistencies regarding which hospital he was born, Obama’s SSN, passport records, and the dearth of personal information that has been made public.”

Maybe addressed, but not answered.
What hospital? I saw a letter that Obamie purportedly
sent to Kapialoni, but was retracted, and Kapialoni is not talking.
Why no birth certificate?

Social Security number? What was the outcome? I understood that he had several numbers, and from locations that he was not known to have lived in.

Please enlighten us. Inquiring minds want to know.


6 posted on 12/03/2010 3:13:04 AM PST by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

She would look good in Orange.


7 posted on 12/03/2010 3:24:37 AM PST by screaminsunshine (Americanism vs Communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StonyBurk
And the Pretender is IMPEACHED.

I'm curious. What part of "Democratic majority in the Senate," and "removal from office requires a 2/3 vote of the Senate" do you not understand?

What in the world makes you think successful removal by this method is even possible?

8 posted on 12/03/2010 3:42:42 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

Heck, we cannot even get the Republican talk radio crowd to have an honest discussion of Obama’s eligibility....chances are even slimmer to get Pelosi to talk.

Sad part about all this, is that the Republican talk radio crowd has been complicit, along with the Democrats and Liberal Media, to shut down discussion of Obama’s eligibility. Most of Republican talk radio is covering for Obama on the Birther issue


9 posted on 12/03/2010 3:46:05 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Isolationism and Protectionism sure beat Globalism and Communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

Keep dragging this dead house around. It’s nonsense.


10 posted on 12/03/2010 3:50:34 AM PST by BiggieLittle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
that is by proving that Barack Hussein Obama is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office

I disagree. Why put the burden of proof on the citizen? Boehner needs to ramrod through a bill that provides the candidates for elections beginning 2012 must prove they are natural born citizens and we must push this through the Senate so it is unanimous. Put the burden of proof on Zero. If he can't produce, then we have the answer we need to nullify.

11 posted on 12/03/2010 3:54:44 AM PST by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior

Maybe we need a million Patriot march on Washington DC. LTC Lakin could be the catalyst for such an event, after the kangaroo court sends him to Ft. Leavenworth.


12 posted on 12/03/2010 3:59:03 AM PST by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

it is a shame Pelosi is the only one in there that has a pair


13 posted on 12/03/2010 4:01:33 AM PST by SF_Redux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

If the one isn’t legal, then he isn’t President.

If he isn’t president, then he can’t be “impeached”.

If the one isn’t president, he can use some TARP money (while he and Meeeeeshel can still get their hands on it) and rent a U-Haul and move their..er...assets out of our White House.


14 posted on 12/03/2010 4:07:24 AM PST by blu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

There is one big problem with thinking that you could pressure Pelosi into giving up the goods on Obama. Pelosi is as dirty as Obama is on this issue and has as much to lose if found out. They are compatriots in crime on this one and she just used it to blackmail Obama into supporting her House minority party seat. No, Pelosi is not the path to uncover this fraud. I’m convinced at this point that it will be left up to bloggers or states who pass laws to force a candidate to proof his qualifications before being placed on the ballot.


15 posted on 12/03/2010 4:11:30 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

I like it . Bring down two crooks at the same time.


16 posted on 12/03/2010 4:17:20 AM PST by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blu

We are getting shafted, and the SCOTUS is fully cooperating, it will NOT do its’ job and help this Nation. It’s really disgusting, to put it mildly.


17 posted on 12/03/2010 4:20:53 AM PST by Waco (From Seward to Sarah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

I wonder who will break down first immediately after Obama falls from grace and has absolutely no power at all.

Will it be Hawaii releasing all its so called records?

Will it be Blagovich finally revealing what Obama offered him?

Will it be Hillary looking for revenge and public sentiment by her spilling the beans on the deals Obama made?

Will Pelosi even be alive? I keep getting a feeling that she is is the sacrificial goat. The goat who knows everything.


18 posted on 12/03/2010 4:23:14 AM PST by Eye of Unk (If your enemy is quick to anger, seek to irritate him. Sun Tzu, The Art of War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BiggieLittle

It may be “nonsense” to you but since talking about this obvious breach of our constitution by our supposed leaders is all we have left to do, then what’s the harm? At least it makes us feel better even though nothing will ever be done about it. The fix is in.


19 posted on 12/03/2010 4:23:31 AM PST by greenhornet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: greenhornet68
then what’s the harm? At least it makes us feel better

By all means, if you birthers enjoy chattering amongst yourselves, go right ahead.

20 posted on 12/03/2010 4:32:06 AM PST by Notary Sojac (I've been ionized, but I'm okay now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
There is one person, however, that had to certify his eligibility, and that was Nancy Pelosi.

That's very true but none of us think she required irrefutable truth to do it. So if she appeared before a committee, itself very unlikely, she would simply obfuscate if not lie outright. It would make her and and 0bummer look even worse, but IMO it wouldn't change anything.

21 posted on 12/03/2010 4:34:38 AM PST by luvbach1 (Stop Barry now. He can't help himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

What part of impeachment do you not understand? The Republican-majority House could vote to impeach Obama; the role of the Democrat-controlled Senate would be to convict him. For example, Clinton was impeached; he was not convicted. It would be the same with Obama.


22 posted on 12/03/2010 4:35:58 AM PST by Hootowl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: StonyBurk
I believe only “legal” political officials can be impeached. What we have in the White House now is a criminal. All it would take is for some group to just go and get him and perp-walk him to the joint.
23 posted on 12/03/2010 4:37:02 AM PST by CaptainKip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: StonyBurk

You could waterboard Pelosi ‘til the cows come home but she couldn’t tell you anything about 0bummer that we don’t already know.


24 posted on 12/03/2010 4:37:38 AM PST by luvbach1 (Stop Barry now. He can't help himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior
Most of Republican talk radio is covering for Obama on the Birther issue

Why?

25 posted on 12/03/2010 4:39:19 AM PST by luvbach1 (Stop Barry now. He can't help himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

Nancy’s answers:

1) He’s a citizen. I’ve seen a copy of his COLB.
2) He was born in Hawaii. I’ve seen his COLB.
3) I don’t know anything about his SSN. Ask the Social Security Administration.
4) A parent cannot renounce the US citizenship of a minor.

Meanwhile, Barack Hussein Obama’s II Certificate of Naturalization is on file with the USCIS.


26 posted on 12/03/2010 4:41:32 AM PST by SvenMagnussen (Soebarkah renounced his US Citizenship in 1968.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blu
If he isn’t president, then he can’t be “impeached”.

But can't he be arrested for impersonating a president?

27 posted on 12/03/2010 4:41:32 AM PST by luvbach1 (Stop Barry now. He can't help himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

THAT or “O” has a picture of her ‘with’ a donkey!


28 posted on 12/03/2010 4:41:51 AM PST by SMARTY (Conforming to non-conformity is conforming just the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

The month of December I proclaim as “Lets hunt down the truth about Nancy Pelosi”

And here is hoping that when the founder of Wikileaks is finally found and is being handcuffed by Interpol that he activates his final launch of all about Obama.

The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Obama will never have in the future a statue, a bill or coin, his animatronic robot at Disneyworld will never move, his very name will become a sear of contempt.

No amount of internet whitewashing or mouthwashing will ever clean his name or image, no matter how prolific his trollbots become in verse and page his name will remain as the vaguest of Presidents, a President with no past.

And no future.


29 posted on 12/03/2010 4:45:51 AM PST by Eye of Unk (If your enemy is quick to anger, seek to irritate him. Sun Tzu, The Art of War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

The focus needs to be on continuing to expose his incompetance as president and defeat him in 2012. Taking notes from the destruction of President Bush, we should all have a bumper sticker with the date that he will be done. I believe the new congress will be busy enough trying to stop him, whomever he is, from destroying our country.


30 posted on 12/03/2010 5:07:03 AM PST by All Blue State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

-——There is one person, however, that had to certify his eligibility, and that was Nancy Pelosi. -———

I know of no factual basis for this statement. I know of no requirement for the House or more specifically the Speaker of the House to certify the credentials of nominees.

She as convention chair sent a letter to the various Secretaries of State certifying that Obama was nominated by the convention. That letter was factual in that Obama was the nominee but she did not certify he was constitutionally qualified.


31 posted on 12/03/2010 5:14:53 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 .....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

You have to produce documents to become a school bus driver. You have to be alive or a preferred minority to become president of the USA.

Something is wrong here. Becoming president automatically gives you the ability to launch nuclear missiles on to any country on earth. It gives you all the national secrets that are hidden from all other Americans. It gives you the undeserved ability to control the economy and the illegal ability to hire and fire CEO’s.


32 posted on 12/03/2010 5:32:50 AM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (Liberalism is against human nature. Practicing liberalism is detrimental to your mental stability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

“Nancy’s certification of Hussein’s eligibility may be a prime reason why he has deferred to her and the House Democrats to develop key legislation.”

I have thought this for a very long time; and therefore, agree with you.

Somehow, this is tied in with why she did not quit after this election.

Any thoughts?

Thank you.


33 posted on 12/03/2010 5:38:31 AM PST by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid; All
OK, If Pelosi was the one to say he was eligible to run for office, does the Republican House leader have to certify that he is again eligible to run for re-election?

If so...THAT IS THE PLACE TO FIX THE PROBLEM!!

34 posted on 12/03/2010 5:42:37 AM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

Screw you


35 posted on 12/03/2010 5:44:34 AM PST by greenhornet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

I was once in the “birther” camp, but no longer.

It’s a dead end. ‘bam is a full American citizen.

His father was not ‘bamI, but Frank Marshall Davis, famous communist, society consort, poet, diddler, friend of the adopting family, photographer and youth mentor.

Consider:
The cheese-cake photos, online a while back, of ‘bam’s mom. Renaissance man, that Frank, they looked like they were taken in an interstate motel room. Rather intimate, no?

The reference in one of ‘bams own poetical things, to Frank as “Pop.”

The comparisons, made here and elsewhere of ‘bams physical attributes to Frank and other candidates to the Pater Familias title. ‘bam is the apple under Frank’s tree.

Yep, ‘bams a natural born citizen. He’s also a bastard; this is the source of the rage he’s turned on this nation.
Maybe he’s a narcisist, but bastardy and the psychological scars that result do not preclude this; it may be the cause.


36 posted on 12/03/2010 5:46:37 AM PST by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greenhornet68

Egad, what an elegant riposte! I am cut to the quick, sir.


37 posted on 12/03/2010 5:58:24 AM PST by Notary Sojac (I've been ionized, but I'm okay now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen
Meanwhile, Barack Hussein Obama’s II Certificate of Naturalization is on file with the USCIS.

Conjecture? or source.

38 posted on 12/03/2010 6:07:51 AM PST by justrepublican (Screaming like a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

Perhaps she does know something. I’ve been wondering what cards she is holding in order to maintain her position as minority leader after that disastrous election.


39 posted on 12/03/2010 6:12:55 AM PST by Rocky (REPEAL IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

It may be tied in in the sense that it adds to her already inflated sense of self-impotance, “i.e., 0 wouldn’t even have been nominated if I hadn’t vouched for him.”

She probably thinks that she is not only the Queen of the House but a kingmaker as well.

I have also blamed Howard Dean, who was DNC Chairman in 2008, for the eligibility travesty. The states left it up to the parties to run legitimate candidates and Dean was the head of the Dem party.

I’m sure there are others who had a hand in it as well...maybe you have someone else in mind.


40 posted on 12/03/2010 6:18:22 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: bert

-——There is one person, however, that had to certify his eligibility, and that was Nancy Pelosi. -———

I know of no factual basis for this statement. I know of no requirement for the House or more specifically the Speaker of the House to certify the credentials of nominees.

She as convention chair sent a letter to the various Secretaries of State certifying that Obama was nominated by the convention. That letter was factual in that Obama was the nominee but she did not certify he was constitutionally qualified.


Hawaii state election law requires each political party to certify its candidates as constitutionally eligible. The statute reads, in part:

(1) In the case of candidates of political parties which have been qualified to place candidates on the primary and general election ballots, the appropriate official of those parties shall file a sworn application with the chief election officer not later than 4:30 p.m. on the sixtieth day prior to the general election, which shall include:

(A) The name and address of each of the two candidates;

(B) A statement that each candidate is legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution;

(C) A statement that the candidates are the duly chosen candidates of both the state and the national party, giving the time, place, and manner of the selection.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/11/19/hawaii-elections-office-releases-nomination-certificates-requested-four-months-ago/


41 posted on 12/03/2010 8:27:56 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

Hawaii state election law requires
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Well, when driving into Hawaii, is there a sign at the state line saying “HAWAII - Birthplace of Pres B Obama”?


42 posted on 12/03/2010 8:43:13 AM PST by xrmusn ((6/98))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican

Fact.


43 posted on 12/03/2010 10:08:21 AM PST by SvenMagnussen (Soebarkah renounced his US Citizenship in 1968.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Thank you for reply. In the meantime, I found this:

http://newsflavor.com/opinions/white-house-insider-pelosi-scandal-soros-and-racism/

While nothing is definitive, it is getting nasty…good….

It seems to blow apart my idea about Nancy trying to save herself and Obama. Obama has nothing to do with it…so it appears. She is off doing “her own thing.” What it is, I don’t know, and that is what the author is trying to discover.

This is part two. Please go to Google and pickup on part one.

In any even, here is a copy of part one of the interview:…..

facebook.com/Ulsterman1

Do you mind if we switch gears just a bit? With the short time we have left I want to throw a bunch of questions at you. Is that ok? Sure – fire away kid. No promise I’ll give you an answer though.

Ok – so you still think Hillary Clinton is thinking of running for President in 2012? Yes.

What will be the biggest factor in her final decision? The economy. If it does not improve she is in. She will run.

How long before that decision is made by her? By spring – a few more months or so. But she won’t be the first to jump in against Obama. Word is there will be a break the ice candidate.

Read more in World Politics

« The Republican Brigade

Moving Forward »

Break the ice candidate? What is that? Someone will step in to challenge Obama – break the ice. That will allow Hillary to come in after and not be the party crasher so to speak. The first candidate comes in and creates the chaos –she follows after to calm it all down and play up her experience. She is saving the party and saving the country. If Hillary gets into the race for president, some version of that process is how it will go down.

You know this? How? There is no real “know” in politics. Things are changing – but Hillary wants in. She wants to be president. So, now they just have to wait and plan for the right opportunity. That opportunity may come, and it may not. They are looking at deciding by spring though, that much I do know. For instance, if the scandal breaks – that would give her a prime opportunity to step in now wouldn’t it?

Yes, I guess it would. If Hillary Clinton were to seek the presidency, would you support her? Absolutely – I have said that to you already. Yes, I would absolutely support her. And I would gladly be a part of her campaign. Hey Hillary – call me! (laughs)

How about the new Republican Congress? Do you think they will get those Bush tax cuts extended? Probably. The Democrats are trying to exclude the top bracket cuts. Make the issue about the Republicans wanting to protect the rich. That’s from a very old playbook, right? The Republicans are aware of that trap, and will work to give a blanket extension for all tax payers. In the end you will see the lower brackets given the permanent extension and the upper brackets given a temporary extension – say two years.

Why two years? Because that will work in the Democrats’ favor for 2012. They will be able to once again say how the Republicans want to give tax cuts to the rich. It’s a simple trap – but the Republicans are stupid enough to fall for it. Just watch. 50/50 they actually fall for it. Boehner…he’s not all that bright you know.

Even with Democrats like yourself being so open about it? The “trap” that is? Sure. This little blog of yours won’t make one difference on that. The media is already trying to set it up for Democrats. The messaging is already initiated. Look for the Republicans to make the same mistake the Democrats did after 2008 – thinking the American people are on their side. No – the American people despise both parties. Well, now that Republicans won back the House in 2010, they can once again be painted as the party for the rich, for the bankers, for big business, etc. With a Republican Speaker, it will make that task much easier for us. Losing the House has made me far more hopeful that Democrats can do well – or at least much better, in 2012. There will be a lot of bumps along the way, but our chances have greatly improved.

You sound a lot more positive than you were before. What happened to all the crisis in the Democratic Party talk? Oh, the party is still in crisis, and there is going to be much more to come…what’s that saying? First comes denial, then anger, and finally acceptance. Maybe I’m at the acceptance stage now. People in the party are talking, things are forming, I see a new and stronger direction for 2012 and beyond. Unless of course, Nancy Pelosi somehow manages to keep her leadership role within the party. That would be…incredibly stupid of us. But you never know what Democrats are capable of right? If Pelosi retains her position, there will be more staff leaving the White House because that will signal the party has truly lost its political compass and the White House will have been proven powerless in correcting it. Nobody wants to work for a loser. The poor bastards who were around for Carter – it took them years to recover their careers, and some never really did.

How likely is it she keeps her role as Democrat leader in the House? She is out. I just cannot see it happening – her being allowed to be minority leader. No way. Yeah, it could happen – it’s possible, but very unlikely. And if it does happen…well, you can throw all of my hope for 2012 out the window. Pelosi is too mixed up in what is coming at us in the coming months.

The White House scandal? Yes, that, and the ethics investigations of Rangel and Waters, and likely some others. The Republicans will drag those out for optimal impact. We know that – we’ve accepted that. Having Pelosi out in front as the face of the party during this time would be a horrible decision.

Specifically on the White House scandal again – I was told a report was coming soon. Something from a mainstream media outlet. Have you heard something similar? Where did you hear that? Your newspaper days coming back to you now?
Just something I heard – reliably. Have you heard anything similar? (pause) Yes. Many people have. This thing is percolating just under the surface right now. Sooner – not later, the pot is gonna start boiling. Yeah, someone is about to test the waters with this thing. I’ve heard that. Then again, I’ve heard that for a while now, so who knows, huh? I’d watch yourself though – told you that before. Be very careful who you are talking to on this. These people don’t play nice.

But nothing more specific? A name? No-no-no. Not going there – not yet. I don’t have the protection. Read the Times. Somebody there has sniffed it out. And a guy over at the Post. If the Post starts to get on it, the Times will probably go ahead and break it open, loyalty to the White House be damned. I told you before, parts of the story have already been given out publicly here and there. One part will lead to another and then another. It’s underway right now. Every week a little bit more shows itself.

You really like this cloak and dagger stuff don’t you? (laughs) Yeah, I suppose I do. But I also take it seriously, and you should too. Your blog thing is reaching the eyes and ears of some people very high up, and it’s driving them absolutely nuts.

Ok, I gotta ask this. And I don’t mean any disrespect to you but so many of my readers bring this up and some of them make pretty credible arguments on the subject that I’ve wanted to ask you about it for awhile…(leans forward) You got my attention – what’s the question?

The birth certificate issue…is it…is there some validity to… (eyebrows raise up) You’re going to ask me a Birther question! (laughs) I’m not laughing at the question, I’m laughing at how uncomfortable you are in trying to ask it!
Well, it does seem to go right into full on conspiracy stuff which I don’t like to pay much attention to. Hey, almost every great government scandal began as a silly conspiracy right? It’s how one side effectively discredits the other – just call them crazy. I have done it many times. Not so much because I enjoy it but because it works.

So…any truth to the birth certificate thing? Hell if I know – and I’m not sure I want to know. Do you realize the mess that would create if it was true? There would be violence of the kind this country has not seen in our lifetimes – or at least your lifetime. I forget sometimes how old I really am.

C’mon, you’re dancing around it. Is there any credibility to it? (leans back, folds arms across chest) Look, I will say this- people seem to have spent a considerable amount of time and money keeping others from finding out. I don’t know why more than to say this president has been very protective of almost everything in his past. From college transcripts to medical records to writings…he’s clearly very concerned with his privacy. I don’t necessarily fault him for that, but it does make you wonder – I understand that. If you are asking me if Obama is an American I say yes. I have no doubt about that. If you are asking me if Obama was born in America…

That’s exactly what I am asking you. Yeah…that one is a little tougher to say. I sure as hell hope so, because if he wasn’t, and somebody is able to prove it – holy hell we got problems.

You really think President Obama might not have been born in America? Whoa – don’t take it that far, ok? I’m not comfortable with you putting it quite like that. It’s not so much I don’t think he was born in America, it’s more that I am open to the possibility of that. Or I’m at least sympathetic to people who wonder about it themselves. But I don’t want to go there – it’s irrelevant to me. It’s too dangerous to consider. And it’s Obama’s own fault. He has covered up his past. Beyond his books, which frankly from what I have seen of him firsthand I don’t think he wrote entirely himself, there really is very little we know about the guy. The one most responsible for all of these conspiracy stories is Barack Obama. When you have White House staff – people who were involved in the day to day decisions coming out of the West Wing saying they have no clue who Obama really is, that shows an environment that is going to create a lot of this conspiracy stuff surrounding the president. And how about I ask you what you believe? Do you think Obama wasn’t born in America?

I’m not sure. I used to ignore that talk. Now I’m not sure. Like you said, there has been so much cover up of his past. Why? And you seem to have the same kind of doubts I do. Hmmm…I wouldn’t go quite that far. I think you want to believe in that Birther stuff. I don’t. I hope to God it’s not true. You on the other hand…
Now you’re putting words in my mouth. I don’t want it to be true either, I am just starting to wonder if…well, it appears there is smoke and maybe there’s fire. Fair enough. I can understand that.

So I take it this White House scandal you’ve been talking about has nothing to do with the birth certificate issue? No – not to my knowledge, no. Good lord, no. Don’t tie me up to that subject matter! And we gotta wrap this one up, ok?

Nervous? No – just in a hurry. We can pick this up again when I have more to tell you.

One last question. Make it quick please.

Who is the next to leave the White House? You correctly predicted Summers and Emanuel before anyone else. Can you give me another prediction on who the next administration figure who is on the way out? Sure – but there is going to be a whole rash of departures coming up you know. Top to bottom.

Can you give me a big name – somebody important who is leaving? You testing me?

Maybe – just seeing if you are still getting good information. Oh – I see. I’m only as good as my last success, is that it?

Sure – something like that. Gibbs.

Gibbs? Yeah – the fat -expletive- Gibbs is gone. And good riddance.

facebook.com/Ulsterman1
REFERENCE: WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: “TEMPORARY INSANITY”
http://newsflavor.com/politics/world-politics/white-house-insider-temporary-insanity/
ULSTERMAN REPORT: WHITE HOUSE INSIDER REVIEW
http://newsflavor.com/politics/world-politics/the-ulsterman-report-white-house-insider-review/

Read more: http://newsflavor.com/politics/world-politics/white-house-insider-clintons-scandals-and-the-birth-certificate/#ixzz174Gq6qot


44 posted on 12/03/2010 10:52:55 AM PST by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
Maybe we need a million Patriot march on Washington DC.

A little more than a month ago, dozens of birthers stormed DC to receive their marching orders from the Exalted Grand Poobah of birtherism...The Great and Powerful Philip Berg.

The "movement" is gaining momentum!!!!

45 posted on 12/03/2010 11:06:02 AM PST by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican; SvenMagnussen

Not even conjecture. More like fevered dream.

Sven makes this stuff up as he goes.

Every month or so he adds a new twist to it, tacks on another claim or blows some more smoke into the gun.

You’ll never see a whit of proof or evidence to back up any of it. he has none.


46 posted on 12/03/2010 11:14:29 AM PST by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
Will it be Hawaii releasing all its so called records?

Abercrombie takes over as governor next year.

The only records remaining will be the ones they want you to see.

47 posted on 12/03/2010 1:51:14 PM PST by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

I like the tagline, and I’m sure it’s on the money.


48 posted on 12/03/2010 2:09:06 PM PST by PA-RIVER ( POTUS is a dishonest disrepectful POS who can't come clean with the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo
It no longer matters.

We are now beginning the Reelection season, and all minds are set on this issue.

Soebarkah, the Communist Muslim boy from Indonesia with the busted lip can go to hell.

49 posted on 12/03/2010 2:18:22 PM PST by PA-RIVER ( POTUS is a dishonest disrespectful POS who can't come clean with the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

I’d argue that it matters a great deal if someone engages in wild hyperbole and makes stuff up to suit their desires then presents it as true.

That kind of behavior is unhelpful at best.


50 posted on 12/03/2010 2:22:07 PM PST by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson