Posted on 12/03/2010 2:57:13 AM PST by Hillary'sMoralVoid
There is only one certain method through which all of the horrors of the Obama Administration can be undone, and that is by proving that Barack Hussein Obama is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States and nullifying his presidency.
The questions and inconsistencies have all been addressed, including such things as place and country of birth, even including inconsistencies regarding which hospital he was born, Obama’s SSN, passport records, and the dearth of personal information that has been made public. There is one person, however, that had to certify his eligibility, and that was Nancy Pelosi. Furthermore, only one state officially certified Obama’s eligibility, and that was Hawaii, unlike previous elections where all states had certified the eligibility of the candidate.
It has become almost self-destructive to attempt to attack Obama directly on his eligibility. The administration and the press corps have automatic responses to belittle anyone that dare question eligibility. To go after Pelosi for negligence and carelessness in failing her responsibility to fully vet the candidate is much more palatable.
The most effective way to do this, in my opinion, is to ask the new House Minority Leader to diffuse all the rumors and innuendo about Obama’s eligibility by answering direct questions about it. Certainly, she should have the answers, shouldn’t she? After all, she was the final arbiter of Obama’s eligibility. Certainly, she could not have left key questions go unanswered, could she?
I believe that if Nancy Pelosi was brought before an investigative committee, the average American would be stunned by her lack of knowledge about the man she certified as eligible to hold the most powerful office in the land. I believe it would become her undoing, and ultimately, Obama’s.
That's very true but none of us think she required irrefutable truth to do it. So if she appeared before a committee, itself very unlikely, she would simply obfuscate if not lie outright. It would make her and and 0bummer look even worse, but IMO it wouldn't change anything.
What part of impeachment do you not understand? The Republican-majority House could vote to impeach Obama; the role of the Democrat-controlled Senate would be to convict him. For example, Clinton was impeached; he was not convicted. It would be the same with Obama.
You could waterboard Pelosi ‘til the cows come home but she couldn’t tell you anything about 0bummer that we don’t already know.
Why?
Nancy’s answers:
1) He’s a citizen. I’ve seen a copy of his COLB.
2) He was born in Hawaii. I’ve seen his COLB.
3) I don’t know anything about his SSN. Ask the Social Security Administration.
4) A parent cannot renounce the US citizenship of a minor.
Meanwhile, Barack Hussein Obama’s II Certificate of Naturalization is on file with the USCIS.
But can't he be arrested for impersonating a president?
THAT or “O” has a picture of her ‘with’ a donkey!
The month of December I proclaim as “Lets hunt down the truth about Nancy Pelosi”
And here is hoping that when the founder of Wikileaks is finally found and is being handcuffed by Interpol that he activates his final launch of all about Obama.
The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
Obama will never have in the future a statue, a bill or coin, his animatronic robot at Disneyworld will never move, his very name will become a sear of contempt.
No amount of internet whitewashing or mouthwashing will ever clean his name or image, no matter how prolific his trollbots become in verse and page his name will remain as the vaguest of Presidents, a President with no past.
And no future.
The focus needs to be on continuing to expose his incompetance as president and defeat him in 2012. Taking notes from the destruction of President Bush, we should all have a bumper sticker with the date that he will be done. I believe the new congress will be busy enough trying to stop him, whomever he is, from destroying our country.
-——There is one person, however, that had to certify his eligibility, and that was Nancy Pelosi. -———
I know of no factual basis for this statement. I know of no requirement for the House or more specifically the Speaker of the House to certify the credentials of nominees.
She as convention chair sent a letter to the various Secretaries of State certifying that Obama was nominated by the convention. That letter was factual in that Obama was the nominee but she did not certify he was constitutionally qualified.
You have to produce documents to become a school bus driver. You have to be alive or a preferred minority to become president of the USA.
Something is wrong here. Becoming president automatically gives you the ability to launch nuclear missiles on to any country on earth. It gives you all the national secrets that are hidden from all other Americans. It gives you the undeserved ability to control the economy and the illegal ability to hire and fire CEO’s.
“Nancy’s certification of Hussein’s eligibility may be a prime reason why he has deferred to her and the House Democrats to develop key legislation.”
I have thought this for a very long time; and therefore, agree with you.
Somehow, this is tied in with why she did not quit after this election.
Any thoughts?
Thank you.
If so...THAT IS THE PLACE TO FIX THE PROBLEM!!
Screw you
I was once in the “birther” camp, but no longer.
It’s a dead end. ‘bam is a full American citizen.
His father was not ‘bamI, but Frank Marshall Davis, famous communist, society consort, poet, diddler, friend of the adopting family, photographer and youth mentor.
Consider:
The cheese-cake photos, online a while back, of ‘bam’s mom. Renaissance man, that Frank, they looked like they were taken in an interstate motel room. Rather intimate, no?
The reference in one of ‘bams own poetical things, to Frank as “Pop.”
The comparisons, made here and elsewhere of ‘bams physical attributes to Frank and other candidates to the Pater Familias title. ‘bam is the apple under Frank’s tree.
Yep, ‘bams a natural born citizen. He’s also a bastard; this is the source of the rage he’s turned on this nation.
Maybe he’s a narcisist, but bastardy and the psychological scars that result do not preclude this; it may be the cause.
Egad, what an elegant riposte! I am cut to the quick, sir.
Conjecture? or source.
Perhaps she does know something. I’ve been wondering what cards she is holding in order to maintain her position as minority leader after that disastrous election.
It may be tied in in the sense that it adds to her already inflated sense of self-impotance, “i.e., 0 wouldn’t even have been nominated if I hadn’t vouched for him.”
She probably thinks that she is not only the Queen of the House but a kingmaker as well.
I have also blamed Howard Dean, who was DNC Chairman in 2008, for the eligibility travesty. The states left it up to the parties to run legitimate candidates and Dean was the head of the Dem party.
I’m sure there are others who had a hand in it as well...maybe you have someone else in mind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.