Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DoT exploring technology that would disable cell phones in cars
The Hill ^ | 3 Dec 2010 | Sara Jerome

Posted on 12/03/2010 3:33:04 PM PST by Innovative

The Transportation Department is looking into technology to disable cell phones in vehicles, according to Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood.

"There's a lot of technology out there that can disable phones and we're looking at that," LaHood said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe."

"I think it will be done," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cars; cellphones; dot; driving; government; nannystate; whatsnext
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: RBW in PA
Only problem is that OnStar(tm) uses the same frequencies that cell phones do. GPS uses 1.5Ghz, so depending on the splash of the jammer, GPS may not be affected. OnStar(tm) would. Jammers may also affect B/G 802.11 wireless internet.

/johnny

21 posted on 12/03/2010 3:49:32 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Okay Feingold, yet another chance to say something, another chance to get all dramatically enraged...

(crickets)


22 posted on 12/03/2010 3:49:53 PM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

So not even your passenger can use the cell phone????


23 posted on 12/03/2010 3:50:04 PM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

They will probably implement something that prevents the working of buttons on a phone, like they do with GPS when the car is in motion. It will be interesting to see what they come up with.


24 posted on 12/03/2010 3:50:05 PM PST by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CGm1WMmYyI


25 posted on 12/03/2010 3:50:27 PM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1

Now that you mention it, I supposed Homeland Security could make the argument that cell phone users in cars are domestic TERRORISTS! Obama could just order them all shot.


26 posted on 12/03/2010 3:53:24 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Damn Obama and his administration.


27 posted on 12/03/2010 3:54:09 PM PST by manic4organic (We won. Get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RBW in PA
This is nothing but an attempt to move consumers to On Star which is a Government Motors product. Cell phones are direct competition to this product and they don’t like it. Not too long ago there was a commercial running were a guy gets into a accident and can’t find his cell phone because of the impact. The hook was that On Star was there and came to the rescue. Well that explains a lot for me.
28 posted on 12/03/2010 3:55:05 PM PST by ColdOne (GOP just say NO. Well that was the plan, what happened? No common ground, EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1
In that case, a jammer would be to the benefit of the auto thief.

Because the OnStar(tm) commands are transmitted over the .8 or 1.9GHz bands.

/johnny

29 posted on 12/03/2010 3:55:44 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
King Obama’s communists America finishing soon.
30 posted on 12/03/2010 3:56:45 PM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Presumably this will raise the price of a new car by another thousand dollars.

How much government mandated junk are we already paying for in our cars?


31 posted on 12/03/2010 3:57:38 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
They have loads of ideas for more.

Feds Propose Backup Camera Mandate By 2014

32 posted on 12/03/2010 4:00:40 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

Lahood from da hood wants a lot of things he ain’t gonna git. The pinko. ;)


33 posted on 12/03/2010 4:03:24 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

No, Secretary LaHood. Bad idea. Here in Southern California, people live in their cars and on their phones. I say this not as a threat but as a simple fact: You will have people of all political parties trying to kill you guys.


34 posted on 12/03/2010 4:04:08 PM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
No cell phones in cars...ooooooookkkkkkkkkkay

First of all, from where was the "cellular phone" derived? Methinks it was from (dare I say it, dare I say it) CAR PHONES

Gosh, what an idea. An actual phone you can use in your car! Wow!

Portability unheard of in generations past.

The ability to call an ambulance if you're in an accident. the ability to call for a mechanic or a wrecker if you're stalled in the hood. The ability to let your spouse/parents/kids know you arrives safely.

Now comes this minute wiener, DaHood, wanting to block said phones in cars...what a totalitarian control freak.

How is this technology going to be confined within the car? Will we be blanking out other pedestrian cell phone users? Why do pedestrians have the right to mobile communications and the drivers do not?

Is anyone besides me tired of this nanny-state bull$hit?

What possible good are cellphones if we can't use them driving?

Again, a few dolts have wrecks while texting and this nannystate nabob wants all drivers to lose phone priviledges.

I say if this is implemented, that we should all just totally cancel cellphone services all over the US. I'll be damned if I'm going to pull off somewhere, and have to get out of my car to use my cellphone.

We'll just bring the industry to it's knees due to cancellations and let DaHood be responsible for loss of all that tax revenue...right here when we can least afford to lose it.

I can pretty much say - knowing some about electronics - that I will disable such a circuit in my car, post haste, and screw'm if they don't like it.

It's time to crank up the TEA party and go back to DC...this nanny state freedom robbing has got to stop.
35 posted on 12/03/2010 4:05:57 PM PST by FrankR (Don't let the bastards wear you down!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Liberals are either just full bore on 100% of totally off.

Why use common sense when you either say “all must do it” or “none can do it”?

The solution is simple. IF people get into accidents and a cell phone is suspected being in use during the accident, PUT A PENALTY MULTIPLIER ON WHATEVER THEY ARE CHARGED WITH. If they cause manslaughter, triple the penalty because they were on a cell phone at the time. Nailed with distracted driving because of an accident? Multiply the penalty. Cause an accident on the phone, the penalty doubles or triples. Cause a death and it’s multiplied to felony manslaughter and loss of license for awhile. We are so lenient towards people who kill others using a car, compared to how we treat those with a firearm or knife. A car is a deadly weapon, you can kill so easily with it. The fact most don’t is immaterial.

You only nail the people who actually get into trouble with the phone. Not the rest of us. There are times when you are following a drunk that you’ll call 911, or if you are phoning in an accident. Sometimes it’s a lot safer to keep moving phoning in problems. I think most calls in the car can wait, and the only time I’ve ever called while driving is for 911 calls, but unless actual harm has come about, don’t charge anyone with anything.


36 posted on 12/03/2010 4:09:59 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Are we ready for the pitchforks yet? What is it gonna take to overthrow these tyrants?

ENOUGH OF THIS CRAP!!

IMPEACH!


37 posted on 12/03/2010 4:11:19 PM PST by penelopesire (Let The Congressional Hearings Begin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Imagine taking a long trip with your kids who cannot text and would rather be elsewhere. I can see an increase in the homicide rate.

These people are so damned stupid.


38 posted on 12/03/2010 4:11:29 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

So in case of emergencies???? You’re trapped in your car for five days or so but can’t call 911 ... almost the same reasoning for plastic bags ... don’t kill trees for paper bags but now plastic bags are being banned. Don’t you just love the reasoning of these people?


39 posted on 12/03/2010 4:12:06 PM PST by ReverendJames (Only a lawyer and a painter can change black to white)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JaguarXKE

These are the kind of State controls the left has been imposing in Britain.


40 posted on 12/03/2010 4:12:54 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson