Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mike Huckabee wants some respect
Politico ^ | December 6, 2010 | Jonathan Martin & Ben Smith

Posted on 12/06/2010 7:35:06 AM PST by Hawk720

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last
To: Hawk720

Alan Dersewitch (sp?) cleaned the Hucksters clock on New Testament knowledge over the weekend. Funny stuff.


81 posted on 12/06/2010 10:06:33 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (V for Vendetta.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

We’ve got two clemency recipients of his who killed people. So far. What exactly is there to discuss? I mean, Sarah Palin can prove she’s not an airhead. Unless Mike gets God to resurrect those folks...he’s hosed.


82 posted on 12/06/2010 10:17:27 AM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

Mike Huckelberry is a snake in the grass, a back stabber who will destroy any Conservative Republican who stands in his way.

He is nothing more than a syrupy talking little weasel with all the genuineness of Elmer Gantry.


83 posted on 12/06/2010 10:17:38 AM PST by RetSignman ("It's about saving our Republic, STUPID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

Yeah, put me on the Upchucklebee ping list ;-)


84 posted on 12/06/2010 10:25:35 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

I’ll give Mike some respect...

He is a damned fine TV personality.
If they need a replacement host for the Today Show, he’s your guy!

A new judge on American Idol, a red carpet reporter on Entertainment Tonight, or the next time they need to change hosts on Family Feud....Mike would be an excellent choice.


85 posted on 12/06/2010 10:25:51 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I don’t care how “viable” a socialist is, i will oppose him or her.

Take your big government snake oil salesman elsewhere. I will oppose him at all points in the coming campaign.


86 posted on 12/06/2010 10:31:15 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Or if they need a Mr. Magoo for a movie


87 posted on 12/06/2010 10:31:20 AM PST by Son House (The TEA Party is Going to Be Like a GI Party...Clean House!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

I don’t care how “viable” a socialist is, i will oppose him or her.

_________________________________________________

So. Taking Huck and Sarah out of the equation leaves Newt and Mitt.

Why not just actively campain for Obama, why dontcha?


88 posted on 12/06/2010 10:37:10 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: convertedtoreason
Yeah, the financial crisis doomed the GOP ticket, though McCain's bizarre "suspension" of his campaign didn't help.

I'm not a fan of Huck or Palin, so I hope he runs because I suspect he'll split some of her vote off in the primary.

89 posted on 12/06/2010 10:37:35 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

Ratings are easy to spin when you have an agenda, and Hollywood has an interest in making Sarah Palin’s numbers look bad.

The facts: her show dropped in Week 2 at the end of a holiday weekend with special programming competition. (Most new shows, even big hits, drop the second week.)

In Week 3, the show was back up 17 percent to 3.5 million viewers — an UNUSUALLY LARGE INCREASE for a new show in its third week.

3.5 million viewers is a GINORMOUS number for a podunk channel like TLC. Mrs. Palin has done for TLC what she has done for countless politcos who’ve won elections — singlehandedly launched them.

Make no mistake: “Sarah Palin’s Alaska” is an enormous hit. There is no credible way to spin the numbers otherwise.


90 posted on 12/06/2010 10:41:57 AM PST by Blue Ink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

You got bored at your usual perch at DU, didn’t you, troll?

Lumping Palin with Chuckleby, and listing only RINOs as alternate possibilities - which for you personally is likely true.


91 posted on 12/06/2010 10:46:25 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

I’m not fun of Palin or Huck either.

But I defend them both.

If they become President, I will support them 100% in achieving the conservative goals.

Plus, I will always be their Number 1 critic in terms of policy.

I’M FAN OF LIBERTARIANISM (CLASSICAL LIBERALISM) AND LATER CONSERVATISM. I THINK SENATOR DEMINT IS THE BEST FOR THE JOB. I HOPE HE RUNS IN THE PRIMARY DESPITE THE FACT HE LACKED THE “EXECUTIVE/GOVERNORSHIP” CREDO.

That doesn’t mean that I am blind with the executive credentials of Gov. Palin: 2 1/2 years leading to a sterling budget improvements in Alaska and a huge natural gas project. That’s besides the the obvious limitations of a governor’s powers in AK (State Legislative branch in AK is relatively more powerful than the governor’s office.)

There’s a difference between us:

I BELIEVE THAT YOUR “DIVIDE AND CONQUER” STRATEGY IS DECEITFUL.


92 posted on 12/06/2010 10:51:57 AM PST by convertedtoreason ( Nature tells us to take a LIBERTARIAN CONSERVATIVE stance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

Come on - admit it. YOU have a burning desire for John McCain. Especially his piggy daughter. Or maybe you’re stuck in the 80’s and want the Newt.

If not, then who? Who do you think is viable enough to oppose Øbama?


93 posted on 12/06/2010 10:53:24 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

You miss my point.

I can point to hordes of people who want Sarah to run, myself included. For her ‘faults’ and ‘shortcomings’ she may have - one thing you can definitely say is that she is a Conservative - she doesn’t need a poll to tell her how to believe - she believes in Conservative values, and it’s in her speeches and in her books.

Can you point to a horde of people who are asking Huck to run? Or, is Huck running to appease his ego?


94 posted on 12/06/2010 12:18:03 PM PST by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: convertedtoreason
If they become President, I will support them 100% in achieving the conservative goals.

I'd support Palin 100% in a general election and as President, but I'm honestly not at all sure that Huckabee's goals are conservative.

There’s a difference between us: I BELIEVE THAT YOUR “DIVIDE AND CONQUER” STRATEGY IS DECEITFUL.

I don't get this. I'm not a professional political strategist or kingmaker, so I don't know how my expressed desire that Huckabee run so as to take primary votes from Palin can be "deceitful" at all. Especially given that I came stratight out and said exactly why I'd like him to run.

Would it be "deceitful" is I admitted hoping that Obama would have a significant primary challenger because it might split the Democratic Party?

95 posted on 12/06/2010 1:10:55 PM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

You are hating on Palin b/c she RESIGNED from a job that was costing her more than she was making??????

For real??????????


96 posted on 12/06/2010 6:30:25 PM PST by DrewsMum (New TSA slogan: "U can't see London, U Can't see France, until we see your underpants")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720
The media are trying to set Huckabee or Romney up to be our candidate as they know that when the time comes they can both be easily beaten. Romney has his problems with flip-flops and the health care mess in Massachusetts, as well as being a Mormon. Apparently you can be a Muslim and be president, but not a Mormon.
Huckabee’s past embrace of nanny-state policies and illegal immigration will turn off many. Then there's Huck's pardons of rapists, murderers and drunk drivers that led to tragic consequences for innocents in more than one instance. Let us not forget that his son cold-bloodedly killed a dog and LOOKS like a fat psycho in general. The MSM know all of this and will run it 24/7 if this bozo is the Republican nominee. Further, I wouldn't be surprised if they have dirt on the two of them (Huck and Romney) to save for an October surprise.
I don't know if Sarah Palin can win. If she runs she has my vote. I do know the media must think that she can win as she is the one that they are constantly attacking. (Jim's W)
97 posted on 12/07/2010 3:01:10 PM PST by jim35 (Tea Party former Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

Fat chance.


98 posted on 12/07/2010 3:16:14 PM PST by bmwcyle (It is Satan's fault)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

I would respectfully ask him to go away.


99 posted on 12/07/2010 3:20:12 PM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson