Posted on 12/07/2010 4:50:21 PM PST by LSUfan
The release by Julian Assange's web site Wikileaks of classified documents reveals that U.S. military intelligence discovered chemical weapons labs, encountered insurgents who were specialists in the creation of toxins, and uncovered weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. However, Washington, DC officials and the news media have ignored this information.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
The media have become nothing but LIARS...
Vindicating Bush
How very interesting. I never did believe that President Bush or his administration was lying about that.
So...you so called “conservatives” still want to execute Assange, now?
George Soros is not helping Assange...after this, he definitely is working with the Globalists to arrest and execute Soros.
You want to let him off the hook for theft of classified documents?
Yes. I don't care what information he leaked, he still needs a bullet in the brain pan.
In my opinion, Assange is a free radical, not associated with much of anything.
The information releases have been all-encompassing and I don’t understand the bizarre rage/happy bipolar crap I keep seeing on FR as people sift through the documents.
Source? The Wishful Thinking Gazette?
This no-kidding conservative still wants to execute him.
The shin has hit the fat.
Thanks for the story, though. Not your fault.
Why wouldnt the military of bushes people make this available to the press?
OR Bushes people. Sorry
The useful idiot finally gives up some useful info.
What I want to see are the files on BO’s fake BC, foreign passports, stolen Social Security Numbers and illegal Foreign Contributions.
This “so called conservative” knew about the WMD. Media ignored it then & will ignore it now.
Yes I still want his head.
Bush never adequately defended himself. It was if he had other fish to fry, like fight a war. The information was out there, but the MSM was ignoring it and Bush refused to take the bully pulpit and shame the press. BTW: The MSM will ignore it this time, also!
Assange a total anarchist?
Maybe because they hadn’t found them all, maybe because some stuff did migrate out of the country ...
who knows what the strategy is/was to keeping the “finds” secret...
The other thought is, if they did or had broadcast they were finding this stuff....then what of Al Queda and the rogue insurgents going after it and using it. Could you just imagine every gang in Iraq scavenging the countryside, finding and using....
If Assange ended up missing never to be seen again, that would be a good thing.
Any American service person spending any time on any of several Iraqi bases where Germans had built very expensive labs and testing facilities could have told the lying media that Saddam was totally invested in developing (in some cases already possessing) WMD. I saw the evidence first hand.
Nidal Malik Hasan will get off the hook. But nobody should get off the hook on this leak.
Possibly. Pirate Bay and the /b/tards are defending him. Doesn’t get more anarchistic than that.
Can’t be! That would mean Valerie “Double-O Nuthin’” Plame and Joe “Yellow Cake & Sweat Tea” Wilson are also liars, and THAT does not fit the narrative. Nothing to see here, move along.....
I have not found one person who even realizes that the AQ Khan Islamic Bomb program even existed much less how serious it was.
The press completely suppressed any evidence of these programs to intentionally destroy the Bush Administration. What the media did is criminal but the Bush Administration is as much to blame for not fighting back.
For some reason, Bush refused to stand up and fight against the media propaganda war to undermine the United States. This refusal destroyed a lot of his effectiveness as President and seriously our image world wide.
I wouldn't be surprised if the libertarians want to string him up now. After all, Assange just proved the justification for Bush's Perpetual War for Oil and the Expansive Power of the State in Iraq.
The nation has suffered grievously for the sake of Bush's pretentious posturing about his "Office."
That makes sense. It just would have helped the effort, or morale so much if you held it up and said “here it is!”, and we arent stopping until we get to Tehran.
This is like asking if you still want to stop a rabid dog who just happened to kill a rattlesnake on his way toward you.
of course they did.
W had “90 days”
With Kerry, HRC and the gang going to Turkey to prevent the pincer move, they AUTHORIZED the DEATHS of who knows how many US troops.
THESE PEOPLE ARE ENEMIES OF THE REPUBLIC.
All of them.
I will not send them lillies. Urine, maybe, but not lillies.
If Assange himself curiously goes missing, that won’t stop the other Assange’s out there from taking his place.
I guess he was busy with aliens...
I don’t think Manning stole them himself. I think he had help.
I'm a so called "conservative, bigot, racist and homophobe" and I'd pull the trigger on the bastard.
I don't give a fat rat's ass, how much {or little} he helps or hurts conservatives, the bastard deserves to be executed.
Saddam gassed 5,000 Kurds in 1988. Never was any question in my mind about WMDs. Funny how this event never got a lot of mention...
I'm with you. I never believed President Bush lied. Especially when Iraq used lethal gas to kill in their own country.
I am hoping for a Wikileaks victory against the web repressors, and for others “anarchists’ to pick up the load.
This is a important battle for freedom, just as the Pirates of Caribbean established the groundwork for a survivable American Revolution, so do these anarchists.
Yesterday I pointed out that the only citizens in uniform to pointedly and publicly refuse to salute Hitler and Mussolini were the Italian anarchists, and their uniforms were prison uniforms. Why didn’t all the other officials refuse ! ! ! ? ? ?
In my house Bush NEVER needed vindicating
Yep. I started floating the theory right after the invasion that the reason any stories of WMD facilities were being spiked was just for that reason. Saddam had over 10,000 weapons depots. The LAST thing we needed was to be in some kind of race with Al Queda to scrounge up some chemical or bio weapons, all spread out allah-knows-where. It seemed logical to me that it was in our best interest to say instead that there were no WMDs. One reason I was so suspicious of this was that it seemed like the announcement of "no WMD's" came out ~awfully~ early... long before we could have actually searched all those thousands of locations. It would meand that Bush would have to fall on his sword and take the personal hit for it, but I do think he would do that if that's what was necessary.
“then what of Al Queda and the rogue insurgents going after it and using it. Could you just imagine every gang in Iraq scavenging the countryside, finding and using....”
This is the explanation that makes the most sense on why the Bush administration did not advertise the WMD finds. Also, it is possible there are still some in Iraq.
Oh, I'm sure he's capable of stealing the info. That generation is fairly adept with respect to computers. I question HOW a PFC was able to obtain security clearance to access the files, AND who put him up to it, AND what was the payoff?
A fabulous condo in Key West?
Bookmark.
really?? You want a few moments to re-think, and re-state that INCREDIBLY stupid statement??
Agree but eliminating scum works for me... kind of like the Taliban and Al Qaeda commanders.. there seems to be an endless list but we keep pooping them off as well.
Because as long as the Jihadists and their allies were getting positive help from the idea that “Bush lied” and “Intelligence was sexed up” and all of those media statements, they were unlikely to blow all of that positive press by using WMDs. Letting the misinformation stand, letting the enemy get a propaganda advantage out of using the misinformation, helped stop them using the weapons and blowing that advantage.
Better a politician be called a fool or even a liar, than soldiers die because he protected his reputation.
And they knew it would all come out in the end anyway.
You know the left didn’t start hating Assange until he said 9/11 was not a conspiracy. He also said he wasn’t against war. After that they started saying he was CIA some even suggested he was a Republican plant.
He also made the mistake of telling on the Arab’s wanting Iran taken out. The “social democrats” like the rape accusers in Sweden are very much against any war and are angry that Sweden’s had troops in Afghanistan under NATO’s Partnership for Peace program.
I think there is more to this story.
Glen Beck’s take on the accusers brings up the social democrats.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQUYfSo1i2E&feature=player_embedded#!
“I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud,” Assange told The Belfast Telegraph in an interview published July 19.
http://www.therightperspective.org/2010/08/04/wikileaks-founder-annoyed-at-911-theories/
Crisis management continues to be a key task for NATO. Sweden participates at present in two NATO-led crisis management operations, in KFOR (Kosovo Force) in Kosovo and ISAF (International Security Assistance Force) in Afghanistan.
http://www.swedenabroad.com/Page____45705.aspx
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.