Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A resolution impeaching G. Thomas Porteous - GUILTY (Shocking /sarcasm look who voted NOT GUILTY)
Senate Roll Call vote #264 ^

Posted on 12/08/2010 10:02:48 AM PST by davidosborne

Shocking !! /sarcasm


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; connecticut; december2010; gthomasporteous; guilty; illinois; impeachment; iowa; judge; kansas; louisiana; maryland; michigan; minnesota; nevada; neworleans; porteous; slickwillie; spartansixdelta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-81 next last

1 posted on 12/08/2010 10:02:52 AM PST by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

Grouped By Vote PositionGUILTY -—90
Akaka (D-HI)
Alexander (R-TN)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Begich (D-AK)
Bennet (D-CO)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Bond (R-MO)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Brown (R-MA)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burr (R-NC)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Coons (D-DE)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagan (D-NC)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Inouye (D-HI)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kerry (D-MA)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Kohl (D-WI)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
LeMieux (R-FL)
Leahy (D-VT)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
Lugar (R-IN)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCain (R-AZ)
McCaskill (D-MO)
McConnell (R-KY)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schumer (D-NY)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Shelby (R-AL)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (D-PA)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Tester (D-MT)
Thune (R-SD)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Vitter (R-LA)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (D-VA)
Webb (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wicker (R-MS)
Wyden (D-OR)

NOT GUILTY -—6
Cardin (D-MD)
Durbin (D-IL)
Franken (D-MN)
Harkin (D-IA)
Levin (D-MI)
Reid (D-NV)

Not Voting - 4
Brownback (R-KS)
Dodd (D-CT)
Kirk (R-IL)


2 posted on 12/08/2010 10:04:47 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

Al Franken is such a POS.


3 posted on 12/08/2010 10:05:34 AM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

forgive me, but what did he do????? I see only the most experienced??? communists voted not guilty


4 posted on 12/08/2010 10:06:41 AM PST by joe fonebone (The House has oversight of the Judiciary...why are the rogue judges not being impeached?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
I'm actually kinda shocked that Brown, Marxist, Ohio voted guilty.

Laughed at the 'not guilty' gang. :)

5 posted on 12/08/2010 10:07:10 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

Nevada: Reid (D-NV), Not Guilty

Minnesota: Franken (D-MN, Not Guilty

Michigan: Levin,(D-MI), Not Guilty


6 posted on 12/08/2010 10:07:36 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

Nevada: Reid (D-NV), Not Guilty

Minnesota: Franken (D-MN, Not Guilty

Michigan: Levin,(D-MI), Not Guilty


7 posted on 12/08/2010 10:07:41 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
NOT GUILTY ---6

Cardin (D-MD)
Durbin (D-IL)
Franken (D-MN)
Harkin (D-IA)
Levin (D-MI)
Reid (D-NV)

Typical bunch of crap weasels.

8 posted on 12/08/2010 10:07:41 AM PST by Enterprise (TSA - The Silly Agency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Be a pretty good campaign add to run against them.

Corrupt judge — he votes to aquit!

Straight and easy to understand.


9 posted on 12/08/2010 10:07:58 AM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I guess if your last name ends in “in” or “en” you were likely to vote against it.


10 posted on 12/08/2010 10:08:30 AM PST by w1andsodidwe (How can you tell when the President is lying? When his lips move, of course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2009/12/cash_gifts_liquid_lunch_the_ca.html
In the opening hearing, House investigators said Porteous had racked up more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos.

Two New Orleans attorneys who once worked with Porteous said they gave the judge at least $20,000 in cash gifts while he was a judge, including $2,000 stuffed in an envelope in 1999, just before Porteous decided a major civil case in their client’s favor.

After they complained to Porteous about his frequent solicitations for cash and threatened to cut him off, the attorneys said, Porteous began sending court-appointed work to their firm. In return, the attorneys sent some of the fees they received to the judge.

At another hearing, the lawyer Porteous hired for his 2001 bankruptcy discussed how he and Porteous initially filed the judge’s bankruptcy under the name “Orteous,” with a hastily arranged post office box as his address, to keep his name out of the newspaper. House investigators said Porteous also lied about his debts and assets in an effort to lower his bankruptcy payments.

Later, New Orleans bail bondsman Louis Marcotte testified that he and Porteous had a long-standing relationship in which Marcotte routinely took Porteous to lavish meals at French Quarter restaurants and offered his employees to work on Porteous’ cars and home. In return, Porteous manipulated bond amounts for defendants to give Marcotte the highest fees possible, said Marcotte, who served 18 months in prison on related corruption charges.

Porteous also erased criminal convictions for two of Marcotte’s employees.

“I knew he was struggling ... he would have five, six Absolut (vodka) and tonics” at lunch, Marcotte testified. “I asked him for things and he asked me for things.”


11 posted on 12/08/2010 10:11:03 AM PST by TSgt (Colonel Allen West & Michele Bachman - 2012 POTUS Dream Team Ticket!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

I’m with Joe on this .. What the hell is the story here!?

There is too much Crap going on to keep up with everything and it would be nice to have a short summary ‘before’ posting!


12 posted on 12/08/2010 10:12:16 AM PST by plinyelder ("I've noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: thackney

Franken is a real POS. A bad comedian steals and election. We wonder why our government is so effed up.


14 posted on 12/08/2010 10:12:48 AM PST by mojitojoe (In it’s 1600 years of existence, Islam has 2 main accomplishments, psychotic violence and goat curr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Franken is a real POS. A bad comedian steals an election. We wonder why our government is so effed up.


15 posted on 12/08/2010 10:12:55 AM PST by mojitojoe (In it’s 1600 years of existence, Islam has 2 main accomplishments, psychotic violence and goat curr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: w1andsodidwe

I guess if your last name ends in “in” or “en” you were likely to vote against it.


Interesting catch on the “in”—4 of the 6 went not guilty, with Feinstein and Manichin being the odd ones out. What, if anything, does this “in”dicate


16 posted on 12/08/2010 10:13:11 AM PST by Hieronymus (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: w1andsodidwe

“I guess if your last name ends in “in” or “en” you were likely to vote against it.”

Wow true.


17 posted on 12/08/2010 10:13:40 AM PST by Christian Engineer Mass (Leftys who zone in on Palin miss the point. America's not about single figures. That's for NK/Cuba.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: w1andsodidwe

Too bad Hastings of Florida didn’t get to vote ...that would have been interesting ??

I want to know when this Big Fat Slob is going to jail ??


18 posted on 12/08/2010 10:14:44 AM PST by W-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

Think he’s the Federal judge who was taking bribes and kickbacks from attorneys.


19 posted on 12/08/2010 10:15:06 AM PST by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus

” What, if anything, does this “in”dicate “

He’s ‘In With the In-Crowd’??

(That’s my obscure rock ‘n’ roll reference for the day...)


20 posted on 12/08/2010 10:15:45 AM PST by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

I’m surprised that Amy Klobuchar didn’t vote in lock-step with Al, as she always does.....


21 posted on 12/08/2010 10:18:56 AM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (FreeRepublic......Monthly Donors Welcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca
Be a pretty good campaign add to run against them.

Especially when about 50 of his fellow Democrats voted guilty.

22 posted on 12/08/2010 10:19:37 AM PST by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TSgt

Thanks Tsgt!


23 posted on 12/08/2010 10:20:53 AM PST by plinyelder ("I've noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: plinyelder
I’m with Joe on this .. What the hell is the story here!?

Go to a search engine, type in the guys name, that's what the hell the story is.

You think that because you've been here a long time, and are so busy and important, that the poster needs to hand you everything?

You whine too much.

24 posted on 12/08/2010 10:21:17 AM PST by USS Alaska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
Franken is a real POS. A bad comedian steals an election. We wonder why our government is so effed up.

I have yet to hear an adequate explanation as to why Norm Coleman and Gov. Pawlenty didn't fight this all the way to SCOTUS ... the stench of corruption and election thievery was overwhelming.

Hopefully Joe Miller learned from their mistake and keeps fighting that RINO c*** Murkowski all the way to prevent another 'Franken'-seat in the Senate.

25 posted on 12/08/2010 10:23:09 AM PST by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike

The irony here is just too good: 100 members of the corrupt Senate Old Boys Club sitting meting out “justice” to a corrupt federal judge. That’s hilarious. The hits just keep coming. These 100 “worthies” need to discover a collapsing wooden platform, short rope, and long drop. Repeat as often as necessary.


26 posted on 12/08/2010 10:23:24 AM PST by MasterGunner01 (To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

Hence, my tagline.... ;)


27 posted on 12/08/2010 10:25:20 AM PST by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

I’m actually kinda shocked that Brown, RINO, mASS voted guilty.

Not guilty/Not voting - jokers.


28 posted on 12/08/2010 10:29:10 AM PST by GOPsterinMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus; Uncle Ike
” What, if anything, does this “in”dicate “

It endicates/indicates that your heritage is neither Hispanic nor Italian. So we can't accuse you of having some obvious connection to La Cosa Nostra or La Raza.

Also proves you're not Ukranian-American or Polish-American, just in case anybody should care!

29 posted on 12/08/2010 10:29:31 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike; MasterGunner01

And mine.


30 posted on 12/08/2010 10:32:25 AM PST by Hieronymus (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Of course Commissar Karl Lenin errr... Sen. Karl Levin D-MI voted Not Guilty.


31 posted on 12/08/2010 10:34:02 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn

” Also proves you’re not Ukranian-American or Polish-American, just in case anybody should care! “

It’s debatable whether the six in question, among others, qualify as ‘American’ under any criteria....


32 posted on 12/08/2010 10:34:29 AM PST by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Liberals often feel sorry for crooks.


33 posted on 12/08/2010 10:37:25 AM PST by freespirited (This tagline dedicated to the memory of John Armor, a/k/a Congressman Billybob.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: plinyelder

The story is whatever you want it to be... The facts are posted.. the opinions are obvious ... no comment necessary.. I will leave the commentary to the pros.. I just posted the data...what say you?


34 posted on 12/08/2010 10:41:47 AM PST by davidosborne (I am SpartanSixDelta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Well maybe liberal crooks.


35 posted on 12/08/2010 10:44:34 AM PST by Starstruck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: grellis; onyx; AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; ...

Thanks davidosborne

NOT GUILTY — 6
Cardin (D-MD)
Durbin (D-IL)
Franken (D-MN)
Harkin (D-IA)
Levin (D-MI)
Reid (D-NV)

Not Voting — 4
Brownback (R-KS)
Dodd (D-CT)
Kirk (R-IL)


36 posted on 12/08/2010 10:49:27 AM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
NOT GUILTY ---6
Cardin (D-MD)
Durbin (D-IL)
Franken (D-MN)
Harkin (D-IA)
Levin (D-MI)
Reid (D-NV)

In this case, the phrase "the usual suspects" is quite literal.

37 posted on 12/08/2010 11:06:48 AM PST by MissNomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

And Porteus just scratches his head with a perplexed look on his face....”why me? Why ME??!”


38 posted on 12/08/2010 11:08:39 AM PST by prairiebreeze (Proudly celebrating CHRISTMAS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

this wasn’t impeachment, it was removal.


39 posted on 12/08/2010 11:09:47 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Criminals giving another criminal a pass...Franken and Reid should be in prison for election fraud.


40 posted on 12/08/2010 11:11:05 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

H. Res. 1031

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 11, 2010.
Impeaching G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Resolved, That G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., a judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the following articles of impeachment be exhibited to the Senate:

Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in the name of itself and all of the people of the United States of America, against G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., a judge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, in maintenance and support of its impeachment against him for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Article I

G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., while a Federal judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, engaged in a pattern of conduct that is incompatible with the trust and confidence placed in him as a Federal judge, as follows:

Judge Porteous, while presiding as a United States district judge in Lifemark Hospitals of Louisiana, Inc. v. Liljeberg Enterprises, denied a motion to recuse himself from the case, despite the fact that he had a corrupt financial relationship with the law firm of Amato & Creely, P.C. which had entered the case to represent Liljeberg. In denying the motion to recuse, and in contravention of clear canons of judicial ethics, Judge Porteous failed to disclose that beginning in or about the late 1980s while he was a State court judge in the 24th Judicial District Court in the State of Louisiana, he engaged in a corrupt scheme with attorneys, Jacob Amato, Jr., and Robert Creely, whereby Judge Porteous appointed Amato’s law partner as a `curator’ in hundreds of cases and thereafter requested and accepted from Amato & Creely a portion of the curatorship fees which had been paid to the firm. During the period of this scheme, the fees received by Amato & Creely amounted to approximately $40,000, and the amounts paid by Amato & Creely to Judge Porteous amounted to approximately $20,000.

Judge Porteous also made intentionally misleading statements at the recusal hearing intended to minimize the extent of his personal relationship with the two attorneys. In so doing, and in failing to disclose to Lifemark and its counsel the true circumstances of his relationship with the Amato & Creely law firm, Judge Porteous deprived the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals of critical information for its review of a petition for a writ of mandamus, which sought to overrule Judge Porteous’s denial of the recusal motion. His conduct deprived the parties and the public of the right to the honest services of his office.

Judge Porteous also engaged in corrupt conduct after the Lifemark v. Liljeberg bench trial, and while he had the case under advisement, in that he solicited and accepted things of value from both Amato and his law partner Creely, including a payment of thousands of dollars in cash. Thereafter, and without disclosing his corrupt relationship with the attorneys of Amato & Creely PLC or his receipt from them of cash and other things of value, Judge Porteous ruled in favor of their client, Liljeberg.

By virtue of this corrupt relationship and his conduct as a Federal judge, Judge Porteous brought his court into scandal and disrepute, prejudiced public respect for, and confidence in, the Federal judiciary, and demonstrated that he is unfit for the office of Federal judge.

Wherefore, Judge G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors and should be removed from office.

Article II

G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., engaged in a longstanding pattern of corrupt conduct that demonstrates his unfitness to serve as a United States District Court Judge. That conduct included the following: Beginning in or about the late 1980s while he was a State court judge in the 24th Judicial District Court in the State of Louisiana, and continuing while he was a Federal judge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Judge Porteous engaged in a corrupt relationship with bail bondsman Louis M. Marcotte, III, and his sister Lori Marcotte. As part of this corrupt relationship, Judge Porteous solicited and accepted numerous things of value, including meals, trips, home repairs, and car repairs, for his personal use and benefit, while at the same time taking official actions that benefitted the Marcottes. These official actions by Judge Porteous included, while on the State bench, setting, reducing, and splitting bonds as requested by the Marcottes, and improperly setting aside or expunging felony convictions for two Marcotte employees (in one case after Judge Porteous had been confirmed by the Senate but before being sworn in as a Federal judge). In addition, both while on the State bench and on the Federal bench, Judge Porteous used the power and prestige of his office to assist the Marcottes in forming relationships with State judicial officers and individuals important to the Marcottes’ business. As Judge Porteous well knew and understood, Louis Marcotte also made false statements to the Federal Bureau of Investigation in an effort to assist Judge Porteous in being appointed to the Federal bench.

Accordingly, Judge G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., has engaged in conduct so utterly lacking in honesty and integrity that he is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors, is unfit to hold the office of Federal judge, and should be removed from office.

Article III

Beginning in or about March 2001 and continuing through about July 2004, while a Federal judge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., engaged in a pattern of conduct inconsistent with the trust and confidence placed in him as a Federal judge by knowingly and intentionally making material false statements and representations under penalty of perjury related to his personal bankruptcy filing and by repeatedly violating a court order in his bankruptcy case. Judge Porteous did so by—

(1) using a false name and a post office box address to conceal his identity as the debtor in the case;

(2) concealing assets;

(3) concealing preferential payments to certain creditors;

(4) concealing gambling losses and other gambling debts; and

(5) incurring new debts while the case was pending, in violation of the bankruptcy court’s order.

In doing so, Judge Porteous brought his court into scandal and disrepute, prejudiced public respect for and confidence in the Federal judiciary, and demonstrated that he is unfit for the office of Federal judge.

Wherefore, Judge G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors and should be removed from office.

Article IV

In 1994, in connection with his nomination to be a judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., knowingly made material false statements about his past to both the United States Senate and to the Federal Bureau of Investigation in order to obtain the office of United States District Court Judge. These false statements included the following:

(1) On his Supplemental SF-86, Judge Porteous was asked if there was anything in his personal life that could be used by someone to coerce or blackmail him, or if there was anything in his life that could cause an embarrassment to Judge Porteous or the President if publicly known. Judge Porteous answered `no’ to this question and signed the form under the warning that a false statement was punishable by law.

(2) During his background check, Judge Porteous falsely told the Federal Bureau of Investigation on two separate occasions that he was not concealing any activity or conduct that could be used to influence, pressure, coerce, or compromise him in any way or that would impact negatively on his character, reputation, judgment, or discretion.

(3) On the Senate Judiciary Committee’s `Questionnaire for Judicial Nominees’, Judge Porteous was asked whether any unfavorable information existed that could affect his nomination. Judge Porteous answered that, to the best of his knowledge, he did `not know of any unfavorable information that may affect [his] nomination’. Judge Porteous signed that questionnaire by swearing that `the information provided in this statement is, to the best of my knowledge, true and accurate’.

However, in truth and in fact, as Judge Porteous then well knew, each of these answers was materially false because Judge Porteous had engaged in a corrupt relationship with the law firm Amato & Creely, whereby Judge Porteous appointed Creely as a `curator’ in hundreds of cases and thereafter requested and accepted from Amato & Creely a portion of the curatorship fees which had been paid to the firm and also had engaged in a corrupt relationship with Louis and Lori Marcotte, whereby Judge Porteous solicited and accepted numerous things of value, including meals, trips, home repairs, and car repairs, for his personal use and benefit, while at the same time taking official actions that benefitted the Marcottes. As Judge Porteous well knew and understood, Louis Marcotte also made false statements to the Federal Bureau of Investigation in an effort to assist Judge Porteous in being appointed to the Federal bench. Judge Porteous’s failure to disclose these corrupt relationships deprived the United States Senate and the public of information that would have had a material impact on his confirmation.

Wherefore, Judge G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors and should be removed from office.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Clerk.


41 posted on 12/08/2010 11:15:56 AM PST by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Not Voting - 4

Brownback (R-KS) Dodd (D-CT) Kirk (R-IL)

Is this like "a three-letter word: JOBS"?

42 posted on 12/08/2010 11:16:59 AM PST by rfp1234 (Badgers? We don't need no stinkin' badgers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

His lawyer: Jonathon TURDLEY


43 posted on 12/08/2010 11:20:33 AM PST by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LeonardFMason

Turley is what comes up when you drain a septic tank.


44 posted on 12/08/2010 11:25:53 AM PST by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Some of the idiot dems voted yes because they thought the vote was about Petraeus.


45 posted on 12/08/2010 11:27:27 AM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

My goodness, if they can’t even count the Senate vote correctly, how can any of our elections be trusted?

Not Voting — 4
1. Brownback (R-KS)
2. Dodd (D-CT)
3. Kirk (R-IL)
4. ???


46 posted on 12/08/2010 11:28:04 AM PST by TheOldLady (The only way to run our country is conservatively.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

There has GOT to be more to this story.


47 posted on 12/08/2010 11:38:16 AM PST by Texas resident (Hunkered Down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

I would have never beleived a dem controlled house and senate would do what my tagline says...now that we have control of the house, i can think of no better way to make the commies in the senate squirm than to live up to my tagline...and there are plenty of targets


48 posted on 12/08/2010 11:38:45 AM PST by joe fonebone (The House has oversight of the Judiciary...why are the rogue judges not being impeached?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady

The fourth non-vote was Lincoln (D-AR).


49 posted on 12/08/2010 11:56:54 AM PST by Hunton Peck (Life, Liberty, Property, and the means to protect them, are what it's about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

you are correct in your terminology.. the House voted to Impeach and the Senate voted to Remove.. the interesting point.. and the subject of this thread was to point out the facts as to WHO VOTED “NOT GUILTY” ..


50 posted on 12/08/2010 11:57:28 AM PST by davidosborne (I am SpartanSixDelta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-81 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson