With these kind of rules, the guy who recorded those cops beating the snot out of Rodney King would have been thrown in jail.
Private citizens should have the right to record everything anybody ever says to them.
And public officials should have the fear that everything they say to anyone is being recorded.
Seems the most bedwetting liberal states are the ones that have laws that do not allow citizens to record.
People need to rise up and get their rights back to record public officials.
Just one more example of how totally our lives are being taken over by The Man. Every aspect of our day to day activities are subject to a myriad of often conflicting, frequently hardly known, rules and regulations.
Our system for oversight of the powers-that-be is in desperate need of overhaul. The average Joe Citizen does not stand a snowball's chance in hell of successfully challenging a law or rule or regulation that we feel is not constitutional or oversteps the bounds of the agency. Government, at every level, has become way too powerful, willing and able to devote huge amounts of resources to coming down on a common citizen who feels they've been mistreated. Their first response is to make it so onerous to question their authority that you will not even consider it. I would certainly be willing to contribute to a fund set up for the purpose of helping this man get his day in court.
This is one of those rare occasions where I agree with the ACLU.
People need to be able to protect themselves, at least with electronic recording devices.
This would put everybody on notice that what you do may be recorded, so be nice.
For the police, it means do only what you must.
Public officials should be REQUIRED to have a recording made and archived of everything they do every minute of every day they are “on the clock” or enjoying some special privilege that peons don’t enjoy (like carrying a gun where we can’t).
This especially includes cops and school teachers.
This article is annoyingly overlong, but very informative. I generally always back the blue, but I think the civil servants, be they local, state or fed, are starting to get a siege mentality, because they know the economy is bad and that usually brings more budget scrutiny.
Too bad. If your an unelected civil servant nursing at the taxpayer teat, then you better be D#$N glad you got a job
period and walk the VERY straight and narrow.
Great article - a keeper.
There is no legitimate reason to prohibit recording public exchanges involving ANY public official, and the only rational I see exhibited against it is when public officials try to weasel their way out of misdoings.
Therefore, expect to see more stringent rules applied against our fellow subjects in the future.
After all, we gotta keep the sheeple in line, right?
“Illinois wiretapping law, which makes it a Class 1 felony to record someone without his consent.”
A judge in a courtroom has no expectation of a “right to privacy”!
The travesty here is the double standard. Cops on duty can and do record you at any time within the public realm, including traffic stops. Not to mention cities that have cameras on the public streets. They do that because in their legal determination it’s a public place. The courts have supported that.
Except for officials and police officers. What’s public for you at the same time, same place, is private for them. It violates multiples areas of the Constitution. Hopefully the courts will continue to smack their bags on this one.
Illinois public officials prefer their collusion with the mafia, their police corruption and excesses not be recorded.
The LAW should read precisely the opposite, “No public officials shall act in their capacity WITHOUT being recorded.”