Skip to comments.Could Ron Paul Take Down Sarah Palin?
Posted on 12/13/2010 11:36:14 AM PST by pissant
click here to read article
I totally agree. However, I also think that it would be better off if Palin took care of the party or became a serious political commentator who supported DeMint or someone else who has not endorsed McCain and other RINOs.
Just because someone lumps Precious in with the other RINOs doesn’t mean they all the sudden like those other RINOs. It means they ALL need to be weeded out of the primary.
You SURE about that?
More like, A. Anybody who can split the vote and drive the Falcon Party to the preeminent position on the American political landscape that it deserves.
Only a slavering Paultard would think so.
Your infatuation with Gabourey Sidibe
or are you channeling gollum and you...
Get on track Piss, your self entertaining little euphemisms are getting tiresome, boring and are really whacked out.
Plaid works for you though I must say! Been golfing with Rove, Gingrich, Romney and Paul??
Only if she's allergic to shrimp.
Gabourey’s kinda hot, huh?
I may not be a big Sarah fan, but I do think she could survive the 50-60 paulbots that are still around.
Perfect, a bird that doesn't exist and what the majority of the party members (one) do so well.
So what big name are you going to get to run under the Falcon Blog, err, I mean Falcon Party(sic)’s name?
Are they going to run a candidate?
You tell me auntie, it is your blog, err, party.. lol
It is? That’s news to me. I’m just a contributor.....a year ago.
Really? You sure did take credit for it when it first launched. You spoke a lot in the first person about launching it.
Like I said, I contributed to it. I was involved. And I haven’t done squat for a year. It does have the perfect platform, BTW. I hope it takes off. But it ain’t gonna be my doing that makes it happen.
Pissant still grasping at his misogynist straws.
Title IX is amazing, isn’t it? I’m sure glad I’m a feminist. /s
She IS ineluctable!
pervert?really? Your grasp of th English is rather rudimentary so here is the precise quote from Ron Paul
“I have received several calls and visits from constituents who, in spite of the heavy investment in their training, have been forced out of the military simply because they were discovered to be homosexual,” Paul said Friday. “To me, this seems like an awful waste. Personal behavior that is disruptive should be subject to military discipline regardless of whether the individual is heterosexual or homosexual. But to discharge an otherwise well-trained, professional, and highly skilled member of the military for these reasons is unfortunate and makes no financial sense.”
Sure, it is weak of him to chose functionality and efficiency over morality (which I would never do) but that does not make him a Pervert, thats just disingenuous. Surely, you find a word that is more apropos?
I think it violates the intent of the posting rules if not the letter, but you think different.
Be as uncivil and insulting as you feel you need to be... those of us here seeking reasoned debate will just avoid you.
As I said, as a supporter of Dr. Paul, I don't feel the need to insult his detractors and the RINOs and Neocons they support, because events of the last 10 years or so have pretty much vindicated what the good doctor has been saying the last 30-40 years, at least as far as I'm concerned, on both his domestic and foreign policy positions.
By the way, barak osama is a anti-American commie, as well as a muslim illegal alien, whitey-hating racist scumbag - those are facts, not insults.
I don't think any pubbie with a realistic chance at being elected prez in 2012 could form a strong alliance with Dr. Paul without hurting his/her chances at this time - he's been so maligned for so long now, and is in such disagreement with mainstream pubbie positions in some areas, that I think it would hurt their chances.
That being said, this could change over the next 2 years if conditions keep getting worse domestically and overseas.
Palin would have to convince me she'd do right on the issue of the criminal alien invasion/colonization of this nation, as well as change her stated positions on foreign policy - the last election was so bad (for us) that people have forgotten that the McCain/Palin ticket was openly advocating confrontation with Russia over the Georgia/South Ossetia conflict.
Bad enough they were advocating another idiotic war, but they were advocating joining the wrong side too. Confront a nuclear-armed power, on their own border and on the other side of the planet from us, in a conflict we had no strategic interests in, just so Georgia could attack, occupy and subjugate a people who wanted to be free and independent? Scary.
Lastly, I don't support high public office for military figures these days - you don't reach high rank in the US military today without being a backstabbing, power-hungry politician, but without the decades of participation in the civilian political process having a moderating effect on the actions you'd be willing to take in pursuing and maintaining power.
On the plus side of your proposal, what could be worse than what we have now?
By the way, barak osama is a anti-American commie, as well as a muslim illegal alien, whitey-hating racist scumbag - those are facts, not insults.And by the way, Ron Paul is an Israel-hating, Islamofacist-loving useful idiot of the One World Domination Leftists.
you're wrong again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.