Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gays in military would undermine defense
Sun Sentinel ^ | December 13, 2010 | Cal Thomas

Posted on 12/13/2010 2:06:02 PM PST by Red Steel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-283 next last
To: verity; central_va; metmom; little jeremiah; xzins; P-Marlowe; trisham; Darkwolf377; ...
Asshole.

Sober up so you can follow a conversation.

And I do not give a damn what Robinson's position is on any subject.

You are the the biggest troll on FR and have been for years, why is it not surprising that you are pushing the homosexual agenda.

41 posted on 12/14/2010 6:21:27 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: hoyt-clagwell

Isn’tit a pity that “men” want to see women do THEIR jobs.

Yes, they LOWER standards for women because they LACK the physical body upper strength to do a man’s job. Now we have “men” cheering them on. The gender blender illusion goes on.

In the old days it used to be a high insult to say,

“Your mom wears army boots.”

Yes, we’ve come a long way, haven’t we?


42 posted on 12/14/2010 6:51:14 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: hoyt-clagwell

I also like consistency.

I don’t want males who are totallyt confused on WHO they are supposed to be attracted to in the military. I don’t care what position they are in. Gays are NOT normal. There is NOTHING normal about a male emulating a female as the “other half”. By birth a female or pretending to be a female has NO PLACE.

When you mix the genders, there is problems. Any ship that has straight males and females bunking together ... the pregnancy rate goes through the roof. DUH, I wonder why. Now they want “wifey” who is a faggot next to their queer serving together. It doesn’t work.

Keep the males and females SEPARATE.Keep females OUT of combat positions and get rid of ALL the “gays”. I don’t care if the “gay” is the “cow” or the “bull”. Throw them the hell OUT and get them HELP for their EMOTIONAL issues they act out sexually.


43 posted on 12/14/2010 6:56:14 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Eska

“But still, you ain’t going to keep them all out. As long as they do their job and don’t go out flag waving their disease; I say let them alone; feel sorry for them rather than hate them. “

So NORMAL people are supposed to endure PERVERTS?

We don’t want EMOTIONALLY DISTURBED faggots in our military. They should be REQUIRED to get professional help for their EMOTIONAL ISSUES THEY ACT OUT SEXUALLY. There is NO sane reason in the world why NORMAL people have to endure PERVERTS.

Yes, feel sorry for them but do NOT subject NORMAL people to their issues when it could be a matter of life and death. How dare you suggest we put perverts on a pedestal! HOW DARE YOU! Have RESPECT for those that are NORMAL. To NOT want to be around ABNORMAL people, doesn’t necessarily imply “hating” them. It just means they have NO PLACE in our military. It’s like wanting a serial killer in the military - we don’t want that either.


44 posted on 12/14/2010 7:03:38 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: verity; wagglebee; P-Marlowe; little jeremiah; scripter; Lancey Howard; pissant; jazusamo; ...
Chode: here's the deal, two fags are having sex in the same unit, and one day the unit gets hit. will one or both of them sacrifice YOU and or the whole unit to save their queer sex partner???

Verity: Is it not ironic that that the same was said about female soldiers serving with men? lol

If you're saying that a female/male romance could disrupt a unit, then you are wrong to suggest that it doesn't. I have an entire career in the military that says it does. In fact, there have been murders committed over the issue. You really need to deal with your area of expertise...and it isn't the military.

DADT is about preventing the service of homosexuals in the US military. The goal of the military is simple: "Win America's Wars." Anything that adds to the combat ability to do that should be added to the military and anything that detracts from our ability to win should be prevented. Combat multipliers should be encouraged. Combat detriments should be excluded.

Flat feet, fat recruits, too tall or too short, those with uncorrectable vision, those with diabetes, those with tuberculosis, and a host of other attributes or conditions are deemed combat detriments. Those people are discriminated against in their efforts to join the military. And it is right that we do so.

The same with homosexuality. It is a combat detriment, and as such, it will injure the ability to win wars. You mention on item on a long list. The "gay lovers" issue is a combat detractor that on the list of detriments regarding homosexual service. There are so many others that I'm not going to repeat the list for you.

Suffice it to say that the injury to combat operations is far greater than any benefit gained.

And remember, there is no such thing as an equal right to serve. Tell that to the guy with flat feet or the guy with diabetes. They might be the most brilliant in the world, but they can support the war effort in another capacity that is not involved in combat operations.

Finally, FR opposes the gay agenda, to include DADT. I think you make a big mistake supporting it here.

45 posted on 12/14/2010 7:14:52 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain & proud of it: Truly Supporting the Troops means praying for their Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: verity
There are no front line combat units in its asymmetrical warfare. Moreover, females can serve in CSS units many of which are in direct support of and in close proximity to combat units.

EVEN more reason to ban women from the military. It's just plain wrong. Just because the other feminized Euro-piss-on countries do doesn't mean we have to.

46 posted on 12/14/2010 7:23:21 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Excellent post, xzins.


47 posted on 12/14/2010 7:24:37 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Exactly right.


48 posted on 12/14/2010 7:25:35 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: nmh
faggots in our military.

Great post, but doesn't fagot only have one 'g' in it. Maybe one of the FR bone smoker lovers can educate us on the proper use of the word.

49 posted on 12/14/2010 7:26:31 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I think verity is a man trapped in women’s body who is a homo. HE-SHE is very confused.


50 posted on 12/14/2010 7:29:30 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: trisham

Damn right I’m right.


51 posted on 12/14/2010 7:33:42 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: central_va; nmh
It appears that the original spelling was "fagot", but the modern spelling is "faggot".

From Wikipedia:

Faggot

Earliest printed use

The earliest known reference to the word with the pejorative meaning in print was in the 1914 Jackson and Hellyer A Vocabulary of Criminal Slang, with Some Examples of Common Usages which listed the following example under the word, drag:[16]

"All the fagots (sissies) will be dressed in drag at the ball tonight."

The word was also used by a character in Claude McKay’s 1928 novel Home to Harlem, indicating that it was used during the Harlem Renaissance. Specifically, one character says that he cannot understand: "a bulldyking woman and a faggoty man"

52 posted on 12/14/2010 7:38:16 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Only a fool would dispute it. :)


53 posted on 12/14/2010 7:39:28 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: trisham

Seems FREE REPUBLIC has a lot of sick, misguided PC fools. This surprises me.


54 posted on 12/14/2010 7:44:37 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: central_va; xzins; trisham; BykrBayb; metmom
I think verity is a man trapped in women’s body who is a homo. HE-SHE is very confused.

Perfect!

55 posted on 12/14/2010 7:46:43 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: FreedBird

Always looking behind to see who is trying to pick you up, while trying to do your job?
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

If it passes, buy up all the ‘SOAP ON A ROPE’ stock you can find.
The longer the rope, the better.....<: <:


56 posted on 12/14/2010 7:51:19 AM PST by xrmusn ((6/98))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: central_va; trisham
Seems FREE REPUBLIC has a lot of sick, misguided PC fools. This surprises me.

I'm not surprised as some PC nonsense is very subtle and sneaky. Sometimes it's difficult to recognize it because it SOUNDS right because we've heard it so much.

57 posted on 12/14/2010 7:51:28 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: central_va

It surprises me as well, but yet it is so.


58 posted on 12/14/2010 7:53:14 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Doesn’t appear to be a problem for the IDF.


59 posted on 12/14/2010 7:56:18 AM PST by liberte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW; central_va
I'm not surprised as some PC nonsense is very subtle and sneaky. Sometimes it's difficult to recognize it because it SOUNDS right because we've heard it so much.

****************************

Yes, absolutely, and it allows some posters go on for years without blatantly "outing" themselves.

Hey, DJ! Nice to see you!

60 posted on 12/14/2010 7:57:16 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-283 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson