To: Free ThinkerNY
"Im absolutely sure I did the right thing, she said. I had read some online forums, people were speaking of grieving, feeling a sense of loss. I didnt feel any of that. Not that Im a cruel, bitter person ... I just didnt feel I would be able to care for (twins) in a way that I wanted to."
So evil, it's hard to fathom. It's all about her, her, her. Twins have a very close connection with one another, and this twin might very well know something or someone is missing. Jesus, please come soon. The world has gone almost completely mad.
posted on 12/13/2010 8:05:41 PM PST
(Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee ...)
Exactly - she thinks having children is for herself and not about the children. She didn't want three, so she just randomly selected to have one of them killed as she didn't want to bothered by it...and it didn't bother her. She's still the mother of twins, but she paid to have one of them killed. She is the mother of a dead baby, the sibling of her other children...and it didn't bother one bit to do it. What poor children the other two are that they have a mother who values her career more than them and would have been content to kill them just as she did their brother or sister if she thought they would have gotten in the way.
I just didnt feel I would be able to care for (twins) in a way that I wanted to.
Apparently she doesn't care for them at all if she was fine with killing them without blinking an eye. How did she decide which of the twins was deserving of keeping his/her life and which one should die for her "career"?
I cannot relate to such a lack of basic decency.
"Im absolutely sure I did the right thing, she said. I had read some online forums, people were speaking of grieving, feeling a sense of loss. I didnt feel any of that. Not that Im a cruel, bitter person ... "
No, just selfish.
Actually, what she did was pretty cruel, IMO.
posted on 12/14/2010 7:16:05 AM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson