Posted on 12/16/2010 10:06:21 AM PST by EternalVigilance
Murkowski, Brown betray...Senate Vote TODAY on Gay Military...Whip Count 61
Pray in Jesus Name Project
Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt
I just got off a conference call with Christian Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) who said Harry Reid (D-NV) may push for a Senate vote today or tonight to homosexualize our military.
Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) hinted she's poised to betray conservatives today, and Senator Scott Brown (R-MA) also came out in favor, making the whip count 61, so we need a miracle or 2 Democrats to vote "no."
Everybody call Senator James Webb (D-VA, 202-224-4024) and say these words: "Please filibuster Senate Bill 4022 and stop the homosexualization of our military, or we will score your vote and fax it to every Christian pastor in your state, and donate to your primary opponent next election."
Then call all 6 of Webb's state Senate offices: Danville: 434-792-0976, Hampton Roads: 757-518-1674, Northern Va: 703-573-7090, Norton: 276-679-4925, Richmond: 804-771-2221, Roanoke: 540-772-4236.
Senator Mark Pryor (D-AR, 202-224-2353) is up for re-election in two years in a Southern state, where voters just threw out liberal Blanche Lincoln. Call his DC office above, and let's call Pryor's little rock office too: 501-324-6336.
Murkowski said: "With the tax package out of the way, and legislation to fund the government on a glide path to passage, Sen. Murkowski will vote to move to DADT when it is brought to the floor." Brown spokesperson Gail Gitcho said: "Sen. Brown accepts the Pentagon's recommendation to repeal the policy after proper preparations have been completed. If and when a clean repeal bill comes up for a vote, he will support it."
PRAY FOR A MIRACLE. Then let's hit all 100 Senators with one last round of faxes....[and phone calls]
Actually, your post is embarassing. Go home to your husband.
kezzek left the building. I think a memorial would be in order.
Regarding your post (#10), I note that you are a veteran, a submarine sailor. Yet, knowing what you know about the close quarters living of a submarine vet, you are for the repeal of DADT. How do you square that?
Regarding your post (#10), I note that you are a veteran, a submarine sailor. Yet, knowing what you know about the close quarters living of a submarine vet, you are for the repeal of DADT. How do you square that?
I never said I was for it.
It certainly can deduced from what you wrote. You indicated that this should not be not much of a problem for the military. It doesn’t take much to go from that to endorsing repeal of DADT.
Think what ever you want.
It IS NOT WHAT I SAID.
What I said was that if these people are problematic in overt behavior, they will feel the UCMJ.
Here is what you wrote:
“I doubt it.
It hasn’t turned all the workers in private company’s into fairy’s.
Real flamers are gonna get fired for some kind of disruptive behavior. The ones that just work and shut up will stay on.
I think very little will actually change.”
Seems like an endorsement to me. You’re saying that it’s much of a problem, are you not?
I other words DADT is still in effect regardless of what idiot in congress say.
Add “not” after “it’s” in last sentence.
Don't you think that the UCMJ will be changed in this legislation. Remember, it's for the protection of homosexuals and gives them entry and retention in the armed services and allows them to "express" themsleves as homosexuals.
They will be PROTECTED in their freaking overt behavior! They will be made a protected minority, and everyone else will be forced to attend endless gay sensitivity training sessions designed to make it absolutely clear that that if you don't celebrate their perversions, YOU will be prosecuted or discharged.
Negative.
Not on my boat.
You’re a freaking gay-loving idiot.
Good Lord. You don’t have a sense of humor at all.
Tell me behzinlea, just what is your background.
...It hasn’t turned all the workers in private company’s into fairy’s. Real flamers are gonna get fired for some kind of disruptive behavior. The ones that just work and shut up will stay on. I think very little will actually change.
What are you? Sane?
No.
Realistic.
We had a dyke at work. She taped her boobs down, cut her hair short, wore mens clothes.
Really pushed things.
She lost her job for non performance. She raised the bar, we just let her.
The military separates males from females to prevent sexual interaction. How are they going to separate homosexuals? Maybe they could put gay women in with the gay men.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.