Some may see, other will excuse, and many will praise virulence, but the current battle cry is:
Posted on 12/16/2010 10:06:21 AM PST by EternalVigilance
Murkowski, Brown betray...Senate Vote TODAY on Gay Military...Whip Count 61
Pray in Jesus Name Project
Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt
I just got off a conference call with Christian Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) who said Harry Reid (D-NV) may push for a Senate vote today or tonight to homosexualize our military.
Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) hinted she's poised to betray conservatives today, and Senator Scott Brown (R-MA) also came out in favor, making the whip count 61, so we need a miracle or 2 Democrats to vote "no."
Everybody call Senator James Webb (D-VA, 202-224-4024) and say these words: "Please filibuster Senate Bill 4022 and stop the homosexualization of our military, or we will score your vote and fax it to every Christian pastor in your state, and donate to your primary opponent next election."
Then call all 6 of Webb's state Senate offices: Danville: 434-792-0976, Hampton Roads: 757-518-1674, Northern Va: 703-573-7090, Norton: 276-679-4925, Richmond: 804-771-2221, Roanoke: 540-772-4236.
Senator Mark Pryor (D-AR, 202-224-2353) is up for re-election in two years in a Southern state, where voters just threw out liberal Blanche Lincoln. Call his DC office above, and let's call Pryor's little rock office too: 501-324-6336.
Murkowski said: "With the tax package out of the way, and legislation to fund the government on a glide path to passage, Sen. Murkowski will vote to move to DADT when it is brought to the floor." Brown spokesperson Gail Gitcho said: "Sen. Brown accepts the Pentagon's recommendation to repeal the policy after proper preparations have been completed. If and when a clean repeal bill comes up for a vote, he will support it."
PRAY FOR A MIRACLE. Then let's hit all 100 Senators with one last round of faxes....[and phone calls]
Actually, your post is embarassing. Go home to your husband.
kezzek left the building. I think a memorial would be in order.
Regarding your post (#10), I note that you are a veteran, a submarine sailor. Yet, knowing what you know about the close quarters living of a submarine vet, you are for the repeal of DADT. How do you square that?
Regarding your post (#10), I note that you are a veteran, a submarine sailor. Yet, knowing what you know about the close quarters living of a submarine vet, you are for the repeal of DADT. How do you square that?
I never said I was for it.
It certainly can deduced from what you wrote. You indicated that this should not be not much of a problem for the military. It doesn’t take much to go from that to endorsing repeal of DADT.
Think what ever you want.
It IS NOT WHAT I SAID.
What I said was that if these people are problematic in overt behavior, they will feel the UCMJ.
Here is what you wrote:
“I doubt it.
It hasn’t turned all the workers in private company’s into fairy’s.
Real flamers are gonna get fired for some kind of disruptive behavior. The ones that just work and shut up will stay on.
I think very little will actually change.”
Seems like an endorsement to me. You’re saying that it’s much of a problem, are you not?
I other words DADT is still in effect regardless of what idiot in congress say.
Add “not” after “it’s” in last sentence.
Don't you think that the UCMJ will be changed in this legislation. Remember, it's for the protection of homosexuals and gives them entry and retention in the armed services and allows them to "express" themsleves as homosexuals.
They will be PROTECTED in their freaking overt behavior! They will be made a protected minority, and everyone else will be forced to attend endless gay sensitivity training sessions designed to make it absolutely clear that that if you don't celebrate their perversions, YOU will be prosecuted or discharged.
Negative.
Not on my boat.
You’re a freaking gay-loving idiot.
Good Lord. You don’t have a sense of humor at all.
Tell me behzinlea, just what is your background.
...It hasn’t turned all the workers in private company’s into fairy’s. Real flamers are gonna get fired for some kind of disruptive behavior. The ones that just work and shut up will stay on. I think very little will actually change.
What are you? Sane?
No.
Realistic.
We had a dyke at work. She taped her boobs down, cut her hair short, wore mens clothes.
Really pushed things.
She lost her job for non performance. She raised the bar, we just let her.
The military separates males from females to prevent sexual interaction. How are they going to separate homosexuals? Maybe they could put gay women in with the gay men.
To his credit he worked his tail off back on shore to get the job done.
Had he not... axe.
Hopefully every straight guy will quit as soon as his enlistment is up and until then the military should issue cast iron underware!
Promoting mental illness and sexual perversion is not a laughing matter. It is clear that you are engaged in pretense. OTOH you claim that you are not for the repeal of DADT, OTO, you claim it won’t harm the military, and flagrant fag behavior will be punished.
Well, Mullen has said (or was it Gates, one of the two idiots) that if normal men and women don’t want sexual perverts around them they can quit the military.
That says it all.
Gates is in Obamas Army
Jeremiah, I don’t need your council in arms or civility, nor the book.
“homosexualize”...[snicker]
Well, the folks in Alaska have only themselves to blame now...Y’all had a real chance to put into play someone who might have not made this issue now...
Psalm 18:30 ~ “This God—His way is perfect; the promise of the Lord is true; He is a shield for all those who take refuge in Him.”
I have a sense of humor.
Trust the code, eh?
LOL!
WTF is your problem?
Were you born a dumbass liar?
Please watch your language.
Did i offend you?
It is according to what you consider very little.
If “very Little” will change, why are the homosexuals, Leftists, and anti militarylist pushing for it so hard?
Imho, your language was offensive.
I registered on FR in 2002 to fight the faggot agenda. I then widened to include all moral absolutes, and when I get a chance, to speak out against religious bigotry (either against religion, or fanatic sectarianism) but avoid the religion threads for that very reason.
I am not going to call them “homosexuals” any more, as that is also a coined word, by a pederast, to create a sense of a special community of those who practice pederasty and sodomy as an identity. Detailed in “The Pink Swastika”.
http://www.thepinkswastika.com/
http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/books/pinkswastika/html/the_pinkswastika_4th_edition_-_final.htm
I replied to your comments because you either lied or are ill-informed. The vast majority in the military do NOT want homosexuals serving in the military. Now you say you don’t need education. Well, you are dead wrong. I don’t know what book you’re referring to, but if I see anyone on FR lying or ill-informed about the faggot agenda, I am not going to shut up. I’ve reached the limit of tolerance, spilling over, and I am not going to hold back at all. Homosexuality is a mental illness, they are not born that way, they can change if they want to, many have.
People with mental illness and grave character flaws do NOT BELONG IN THE MILITARY.
It’s that simple.
It’d not naivete. It’s called “tacit support”.
There is no excuse for ignorance at this point, especially for anyone on FR.
Those with any wisdom know that the fall of many great societies and civilizations began with the same common progression; namely, the attempt to normalize and accept all forms of sexual perversion and abomination, chief of which has always been homosexuality.
Going against the laws of God and nature never brings good results, no matter how “enlightened” and “tolerant” said country, society or group thinks it is. Punishment in the form of disease, malfunction and chaos is the rule.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.