Lisa Murkowski (RAT-AK)
“In the rear with the gear” has a whole new meaning.
It is as if they were doing all in their power to prove to us that the Ballot Box and the Jury Box are not viable options.
This is asking for a gaggle of sexual harassment trouble. “I’ve got your six” will have a whole new meaning too.
This is going to ruin The Army Ball
Just in time for my faerie nephew to begin his active duty in the marines in July.
16 There are six things the LORD hates,
seven that are detestable to him:
17 haughty eyes,
a lying tongue,
hands that shed innocent blood,
18 a heart that devises wicked schemes,
feet that are quick to rush into evil,
19 a false witness who pours out lies
and a man who stirs up dissension among brothers.
12 The wicked plot against the righteous
and gnash their teeth at them;
13 but the Lord laughs at the wicked,
for he knows their day is coming.
14 The wicked draw the sword
and bend the bow
to bring down the poor and needy,
to slay those whose ways are upright.
15 But their swords will pierce their own hearts,
and their bows will be broken.
Forever, O Lord, thy Word is firmly fixed in the Heavens. Psalm 119:89
If Reid calls for a vote that means that he has enough to pass it.
If it is passed, the destruction of the military as a fighting organization begins.
But this comes as no surprise to those of us that voted against obama in 2008. Nor is it a surprise to those that voted for “hope and change” in 2008.
I did this with the TARP, ObamaCare, Cash-4-Clunkers, etc. LOL if you get him to respond.
In a few years the US military will be just another liberal social program, a Peace Corps with the fighting ability of a UN peacekeeper squad.
We end up with wolves in sheep's clothing.
This is the kind of perversity that occurs when you don't have socially conservative nominees.
How do you like your electorate now milquetoast conservatives?
This is a done deal and we all know it.
Reality: DADT protects homosexual service as long as the soldier is discrete and does not walk around announcing his/her homoseuality and/or holding his/her same-sex friend’s hand—or worse.
Repealing DADT, IMO, will result in making homosexuals more vulnerable to verbal and/or physical abuse.
Heteros are proscribed from any unbecoming behavior while in uniform —both on and off post/base. This includes sexual misbehavior. Not sure what homosexuals gain here. I guess repealing DADT would open up military housing and benefits to homosexual couples. That, of course would be big for them. Unfortunately it may also make them targets .
If this passes, every man and woman who enlisted under DADT should be offered the option of separating from the military on honorable conditions. Then we’ll see how much support repealing it gets.
Who in their right mind will encourage their 18 year old son to sleep and live with men who openly and proudly practice anal sex??
Who would give their son’s over to an institution who approves of this dangerous and perverse behavior?
Who would protect them?