Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Conservatives Win Back the Arts? (American values are coming back into the culture)
National Review ^ | 12/17/2010 | Andrew Klavan

Posted on 12/17/2010 7:49:03 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Despite the Left’s best efforts, conservative and American values are coming back into the culture.

After years of declaiming against the Left’s domination of our culture, I’m startled and delighted to discover that the tide is beginning to turn. My fellow conservatives should take note and lend a hand.

For the last three decades or so, the usual conservative approach to the arts has been threefold: We complain about what’s being produced; we fret about the influence it will have; then we give up with a shrug.

We complain because it seems to us the anti-American Left has made of the arts its private fiefdom. Moviemakers produce film after film decrying the anti-Communist blacklists of the ’50s, all the while blacklisting and slandering conservative filmmakers and their points of view. Critics give prizes and praise to second-rate leftist works — from dreadful tripe such as The Color Purple in the ’80s to the recent slew of soporific and dishonest anti–War on Terror propaganda flicks such as In The Valley of Elah and Green Zone — while ignoring or attacking works with which they disagree. Public funding is available to display desecrated crucifixes as “art,” while art that might be offensive to Muslims — such as the novel Jewel of Medina or the TV satire South Park — is censored with barely a murmur.

We fret because we fear that ignorant people — especially the young — will take leftist art as truth, essentially giving the Left the power to rewrite history and reality in the American mind. Perhaps the next generation will come to believe that Oliver Stone’s absurd but well-made JFK tells the true story of the president’s assasination or that American operatives and soldiers routinely committed the sorts of atrocities depicted in Rendition or Redacted. As former ambassador Joseph Wilson boasted about the contrafactual heroic impression given of him and his wife, Valerie Plame, in the new film Fair Game: “For people who have short memories or don’t read, this is the only way they will remember the period.”

Finally, we shrug and give up because the matter does not seem urgent. Leftist arts may poison people’s minds over time, but jihadists want to kill us right now. Oliver Stone and Michael Moore may make hypocritical millions attacking capitalism, but politicians are dismantling free markets as we speak. And even if the arts are urgent, most of us aren’t artists or critics, so what can we do?

The complain-fret-shrug approach has become so habitual among conservatives that it blinds us to the astonishing change that’s been taking place. Despite the Left’s best efforts, conservative and American values are actually coming back into the culture.

We should ease off on the complaining. For the last few years, movies promoting the Western ideals of self-reliance, morality, and faith have scored at the box office — see The Incredibles (“If everyone is special, that means no one is”), The Blind Side (“Who would have thought we’d have a black son before we knew a Democrat?”), and Toy Story 3 (a takedown of the nanny state). They have also been more innovative and creative — 300, Gran Torino, No Country for Old Men — than the products of the desiccated and outmoded Left. Our best novelist (Tom Wolfe) and two greatest English-speaking playwrights (Tom Stoppard and David Mamet) are now all open about their political conservatism. And new top-notch mainstream TV shows (Justified, Blue Bloods) have arrived to offset the lefty Law and Order and Jon Stewart.

Equally important, an alternative critical infrastructure is starting to grow up in support of conservative culture. John Nolte at Andrew Breitbart’s Big Hollywood website has repeatedly put leftist Hollywood on the defensive by exposing their bias. And even as other newspapers shorten or delete their serious culture pages, the center-right Wall Street Journal has expanded its coverage with an excellent Saturday Review section.

We should stop fretting about the consequences of lefty art, too. The arts, to paraphrase Shakespeare, are the “abstract and brief chronicles of the time.” The conservative shift in their tone shows that the American consciousness has begun to digest the lessons of 9/11: that the Left’s relativistic multiculturalism is a lie; that freedom is better than slavery; and that therefore those systems that support freedom — constitutional democracy, capitalism, and enlightened religion — are better than those that don’t.

Lastly, we should not shrug and give up, because there’s a lot we can do to support and encourage this nascent phenomenon. A conservative community that has set up think tanks to consider governance, law, and economics needs to give thought and support to the culture, as well. Grants, conferences, and awards for artists who know the value of faith, morality, and liberty could counter the present cultural support system that helps almost exclusively the illiberal Left. And rather than allowing the monotonously left-wing PBS and NPR to monopolize highbrow cultural discussion, conservatives need to establish their own outlets to reclaim the elite and intellectual audience the way Fox News has reclaimed the rank and file.

Most of all, the ordinary consumer of culture needs to remember that word-of-mouth for good works that have been ignored or unfairly attacked by lefty critics can provide a powerful and effective counterbalance.

The fight for the culture may not always seem urgent, but it truly is. Arguments are won and lost in hearts and minds long before they’re ever decided at the polls. The arts not only reflect the conscience of the hour, they also shape the conscience of the age.

— Andrew Klavan’s latest novel is The Identity Man.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: arts; conservatives; culture; values
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: r9etb

Absolutely!


41 posted on 12/17/2010 9:15:01 AM PST by SMARTY (Conforming to non-conformity is conforming just the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Despite the author's optimism I'm guessing that the answer is basically "no", at least for the fine arts. There has always been an element of "a bas les bourgeois" in the gaggle of paint-spattered wretches who are the artists - it's mostly, I think, a reaction to rejection. Really groundbreaking artists are seldom appreciated in their lifetimes and the rest, like any other human endeavor, are 85% crap.

The popular arts will be driven by the market - that's what makes them "popular" - and, to be perfectly honest, what succeeds tends to validate the feeling mentioned above on the part of artists who rightfully consider their work better than schlock but are not rewarded for it. Government funding in particular is a horrible suppressor of artistic quality, a sort of Godwin's Law - politics in these days of rampant democratic socialism is, after all, popular culture by definition. Government art funding is misdirected by the ignorant and incompetent toward the superficially unusual in the futile hope that there will be a diamond in the dung; if not, the dung will be declared diamondiferous by our betters and we'll just have to pretend we believe it. We've paid for it, after all. Meanwhile the real geniuses starve or learn a trade to support their habit as they always have. I can't state with any authority that it's good or bad, but that's where great art appears to come from.

42 posted on 12/17/2010 9:20:23 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Andrew is optimistic and has some reason for it. However, can we ask if Hollywood will ever be anything but leftist (it was since the 50s with its screen writers), will the universities be anything else but bastions of modish leftist thinking and indoctrination, will the leftist inheritance from the baby boomers die with the baby boomers or will the boomers spawn new generations of followers, are secularism and atheism (two approved “religions” of the left) making new advances, winning new converts with ad campaigns?

Hard to say. Fiscal conservationism is back but will people still be liberal in their thinking and values in regard to abortion, gay marriage, stem cell, etc.? Will television change its liberalization (and vulgarization) of the public or will the pendulum start to swing the other way? In other words, will Ed Sullivan’s Topo Gigio make a comeback or will it be Team America’s sex puppetry taken to even newer levels of perversity?

Personally, I believe the left will push its views because it believes its at the forefront of culture. It conservatism can stop the left it will have to offer something the public wants.


43 posted on 12/17/2010 9:28:28 AM PST by Blind Eye Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weird Tolkienish Figure

“I’d be happy to see non-politicized arts and film.”

Truth and beauty can still be found, they’re just not as popular as they once were. The left hasn’t burned classical art and literature...yet.


44 posted on 12/17/2010 9:36:18 AM PST by Spok (Obama: clueless, classless, clown.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bert
It's a cultural thing - art, news, music, literature - lots of it is basically free now. How can one lone musician compete within a meritocracy that moves a few hundred superstars into positions to sell millions of copies of a single album?

Art reproductions and third world crafts are the same. Can one local artist compete? Too many people are becoming disposable and useless in this culture - bodes badly - won't hold in the long run.

45 posted on 12/17/2010 9:44:38 AM PST by GOPJ (Sharpton wants Limbaugh off the air- if you don't hate liberals yet, you're not paying attention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Representational art is returning in popularity too.


46 posted on 12/17/2010 9:51:34 AM PST by ottbmare (off-the-track Thoroughbred mare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No, I wasnt suggesting that the govt fund the arts. Nothing I have ever said or written in my entire life could ever lend itself to that interpretation. Perhaps you didnt realize how dismissive, condescending and, again, philistine your comment about having art as a hobby was. As well as clueless. Your reference to Michaelangelo was ridiculous. That was more than 500 years sgo, in an entirely different society and culture. Much of his work was sponsored by the pope.


47 posted on 12/17/2010 11:12:16 AM PST by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I'll tell you something...I don't let the queers who have taken over the fashion industry tell me how to dress what's in and what's out...THANK GOD for thrifty shops with decent modest clothing. I simply love the 50’s and shop around in those store for some wonderful vintage clothing! "EVERYTHING OLD IS NEW AGAIN"!!
48 posted on 12/17/2010 12:21:16 PM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson