Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Military Should ‘Expressly Prohibit’ Heterosexuals from Using Separate Showers from Homosexuals...
CNSNews ^ | December 18, 2010 | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on 12/18/2010 3:11:51 PM PST by jazusamo

Complete title: Military Should ‘Expressly Prohibit’ Heterosexuals from Using Separate Showers from Homosexuals After Repeal of DADT, Says DOD Working Group

A special Defense Department working group appointed by Defense Secretary Robert Gates has recommended that the military should “expressly prohibit” heterosexuals from using separate showers, bathrooms and bunking facilities from homosexuals when the repeal of the law banning homosexuals from the military goes into effect.

The working group has also recommended that commanding officers be left with the authority to exempt individuals from using the same showers, bathrooms and living facilities as homosexuals, but only on a “case-by-case” basis.

The House voted earlier this week and the Senate voted this afternoon to repeal the military ban on homosexuals, which has often been referred to as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”

The working group’s Nov. 30 report—“Report of the Comprehensive Review of the Issues Associated with a Repeal of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’”--concluded that permitting heterosexuals to use separate showers, bathrooms and bunking facilities from homosexuals of the same gender would “stigmatize” homosexuals and be “reminiscent of ‘separate but equal’ facilities for blacks prior to the 1960s.”  The working group was co-chaired by Jeh Charles Johnson, the Defense Department’s general counsel, and U.S. Army Gen. Carter F. Ham.

“In the course of our review we heard from a very large number of Service members about their discomfort with sharing bathroom facilities or living quarters with those they know to be gay or lesbian,” said the report.  “Some went so far to suggest that a repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell may even require separate bathroom and shower facilities for gay men and lesbians. We disagree, and recommend against separate facilities. Though many regard the very discussion of this topic as offensive, given the number of Service members who raised it, we are obliged to address it.”

The working group said that having homosexuals use different bathrooms and living facilities from heterosexuals would not only create a “logistical nightmare” but would be discriminatory.

“The creation of a third and possibly fourth category of bathroom facilities and living quarters, whether at bases or forward deployed areas, would be a logistical nightmare, expensive, and impossible to administer,” said the report. 

“And, even if it could be achieved and administered, separate facilities would, in our view, stigmatize gay and lesbian Service members in a manner reminiscent of ‘separate but equal; facilities for blacks prior to the 1960s,” said the report.

“Accordingly,” the report concluded, “we recommend that the Department of Defense expressly prohibit berthing or billeting assignments or the designation of bathroom facilities based on sexual orientation. At the same time, commanders would retain the authority they currently have to alter berthing or billeting assignments or accommodate privacy concerns on an individualized, case-by-case basis, in the interests of morale, good order and discipline, and consistent with performance of mission.30 It should also be recognized that commanders already have the tools—from counseling, to non-judicial punishment, to UCMJ prosecution—to deal with misbehavior in either living quarters or showers, whether the person who engages in the misconduct is gay or straight.”

The report also said a survey of more than 115,000 active duty service members indicated only 29.4 percent would “take no action” if they were assigned to share an “open bay shower” with a homosexual.

The other 70 percent of service members answered this way when asked what they would do if assigned to an “open bay shower” with someone they believed to be a homosexual: 25.8 percent said they would use the shower at a different time than the homosexual, 17.7 percent said they would talk to a superior to see if they had a different option, 11.1 percent said they would have a discussion with the other person to see how they would handle the situation, 7.9 percent said they did not know how they would handle the situation, 7.0 percent said they would do “something else,” and 1.3 percent said they would talk to a chaplain, mentor or leader about how to deal with it.

The report acknowledged that in focus groups conducted for the working group “a frequent concern expressed by some Service members was personal privacy in settings where they may be partially or fully unclothed in the presence of another Service member they know to be gay or lesbian—for instance, shared showering facilities or locker rooms.”

However, the report concluded that the concerns that heterosexual service members in this regard were based on “stereotypes” about homosexuals and stated that homosexuals have “learned to avoid making heterosexuals feel uncomfortable or threatened in situation [sic] such as this.”

The report argued that heterosexuals and homosexuals shower together “every day” in college and high school gyms and “in professional sports locker rooms” and that it should be no different in the military.

“Here again, we are convinced that separate bathroom facilities would do more harm than good to unit cohesion and would be impracticable to administer and enforce,” said the report. “Concerns about showers and bathrooms are based on a stereotype—that gay men and lesbians will behave in an inappropriate or predatory manner in these situations. As one gay former Service member told us, to fit in, co-exist, and conform to social norms, gay men have learned to avoid making heterosexuals feel uncomfortable or threatened in situation [sic] such as this. The reality is that people of different sexual orientation use shower and bathroom facilities together every day in hundreds of thousands of college dorms, college and high school gyms, professional sports locker rooms, police and fire stations, and athletic clubs.”

The report quoted the adverse sentiments of a number of service members who participated in focus groups where they indicated they did not want to have to shower, use the bathroom or roommate with homosexuals.

“I live in the barracks and I don’t think that it would go over well in that kind of environment,” one service member told a DOD focus group. “I’m concerned about how people would treat that individual.”

“In the privacy side of the thing, they’ll have to make some changes to the current infrastructure, [for example] privacy stalls in the bathrooms,” said another service member.

“I do not have to shower or sleep in a room with men so I do not want to shower or sleep in the same room as a woman who is homosexual,” said a female service member. “I would feel

uncomfortable changing and sleeping as I would if it was a man in the room. I should not have to accept this.”

“Tell him if he hits on me I will kick his - - -!” said another service member who participated in a DOD focus group.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dadt; dadtrepeal; deathofprivacy; doaskdotell; dontbendover; fdrq; homonaziagenda; homonazis; homonazism; homosexualagenda; insane; lgbt; military; obama; palin; showers; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-132 next last
I'll venture a guess the accident rate for in-your-face homosexuals in the military will high.
1 posted on 12/18/2010 3:11:57 PM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I’m speechless.


2 posted on 12/18/2010 3:13:06 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I had hoped that “fragging” was a term that our military would never hear again. Perhaps the elitists in DC should think very carefully about the limits of their power before they do yet another stupid thing.


3 posted on 12/18/2010 3:14:22 PM PST by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; little jeremiah

This is unbelievable.


4 posted on 12/18/2010 3:14:37 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Yes, and following this logic, all males and females in the service should be forced to shower together as well!

Another indication the world is almost 100% bass-ackwards.....”Good is called bad; bad is called good.” and insanity is normal.

Come quickly, Lord Jesus.


5 posted on 12/18/2010 3:15:17 PM PST by Arlis (- Virginia loghome/woods-dweller/Jesus lovin'/Bible-totin'/"gun-clinger")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; trisham; 185JHP; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; Antoninus; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

6 posted on 12/18/2010 3:15:38 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

A special Defense Department working group appointed by Defense Secretary Robert Gates has recommended that the military should “expressly prohibit” heterosexuals from using separate showers, bathrooms and bunking facilities ...”

Then, women and men will not be seperated either? When you got someone who is sexually attracted to you, naturally or unnaturally, and remove any and all barriers to intimacy, you get what this law calls for .. a free for all.

And what will they do with the Bi- and Tran- sexuals that the libbies always include in their official nom de merde, LGBT?


7 posted on 12/18/2010 3:15:45 PM PST by jessduntno (Care what the Left thinks of you? "Their opinion of me and my policies is irrelevant." - Dick Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

This gives new meaning to the old adage:

“Don’t bend over to pick up the soap!”


8 posted on 12/18/2010 3:16:53 PM PST by Palladin (Stand and fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Let me just say this to the gay freaks. I would be very careful about letting the government document your abnormalities. There may come a day when health care cost grow to a point where a final solution must be implemented by purifying the population. Not possible you say, well I once thought we would never give up our freedom with out a fight. Now I know anything is possible.


9 posted on 12/18/2010 3:17:28 PM PST by JoSixChip (America is dieing, Let's face it, your not going to do anything about it and nether am I.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
"The working group has also recommended that commanding officers be left with the authority to exempt individuals from using the same showers, bathrooms and living facilities as homosexuals, but only on a “case-by-case” basis."

Anotherwords, Muslims won't have to shower with homosexuals (unless they want to - wink, wink) but Christian and Jewish soldiers will.

10 posted on 12/18/2010 3:19:16 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet ("You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body." CS Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Repeal of dadt has nothing to do with gays.

It has everything to do with weakening our military by lawsuits, threats of lawsuits, and creating discomfortable situations within our uniformed services, and inviting good soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines to leave and be replaced by...(use your imagination).

It also has to do with destroying the military traditions and culture.

It has precisely nothing, NOTHING to do with gays. (Actually, one could argue that gays are being used and taken advantage of for the dark purposes of weakening and corroding our precious military.)

And, most vets, just like me, feel the same way.

.

11 posted on 12/18/2010 3:19:48 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

That’s food for thought.

The Death Panels won’t just be for old people.


12 posted on 12/18/2010 3:19:49 PM PST by Palladin (Stand and fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Arlis
"Come quickly, Lord Jesus."

Amen!

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

13 posted on 12/18/2010 3:19:49 PM PST by wku man (Still holding my breath, but exhaling a bit after Nov. 2...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The smart ones who want to honorably serve their country will keep their sexual preference secret. But this is nothing but a way to punish people for not bowing to the homosexual agenda.


14 posted on 12/18/2010 3:20:58 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The homos will now be able to do a little recruiting of their own in our military. This is sick. The U.S. Congress is nothing but a bunch of sick bass turds. Wake up America!


15 posted on 12/18/2010 3:21:09 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Merry Christmas to all of my FReeper FRiends!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

THIS is untenable. Stand by for a reinstatement of the draft, because I can easily imagine a mass migration out of the service, if this continues.


16 posted on 12/18/2010 3:21:14 PM PST by MizSterious ("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
..permitting heterosexuals to use separate showers, bathrooms and bunking facilities from homosexuals of the same gender would “stigmatize” homosexuals...

And it begins...

Next week: Sensitivity training and indoctrination seminars.

17 posted on 12/18/2010 3:21:24 PM PST by Flycatcher (God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; little jeremiah

So much for all of those posters who do not believe that this issue is one that will gravely, if not fatally, harm our military, our society and our ability to defend this country. I am stunned by this latest development.


18 posted on 12/18/2010 3:21:34 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Ahhh. But the important thing is that Liberal politico's get to feel fashionable!!

Get with the program, program!!

Gods this is terrible. You watch that 70% vote with their feet.

19 posted on 12/18/2010 3:21:39 PM PST by HeartlandOfAmerica (Obama and the Dem Congress will spend $5 trillion every year of his presidency until they break US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

That DOD Working Group is in fact Gate’s Working Group, a complete sham.


20 posted on 12/18/2010 3:22:15 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Welcome to the Pink Corps.


21 posted on 12/18/2010 3:22:31 PM PST by GeronL (#7 top poster at CC, friend to all, nicest guy ever, +96/-14, ignored by 1 sockpuppet.. oh & BANNED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham

“I’m speechless.”

We have a lot to look forward to;

The Sunday Times - UK
8-27-5

The army came out in style this weekend when it launched a recruitment drive aimed at tempting more gays, lesbians, transvestites and even transsexuals into the ranks.

It set up a recruitment stall at the Gay Pride festival in Manchester, backing its new-found commitment to homosexual rights by sending 10 gay and lesbian soldiers in combat trousers and tight T-shirts to join thousands of marchers on a five-mile parade through the city.

They strode out behind a float put together by the RAF, which was also recruiting. Themed on a fighter jet, it featured an oversized cockpit and a banner proudly proclaiming, “RAF rise above the rest”.

At the stall, the men in uniform, complete with medals, mingled with eager would-be recruits, one dressed in tight leather shorts and a pink cowboy hat.


22 posted on 12/18/2010 3:23:56 PM PST by jessduntno (Care what the Left thinks of you? "Their opinion of me and my policies is irrelevant." - Dick Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

The social agenda nuts didn’t learn from Bussing blacks into white schools & neighborhoods-——In Los angeles, it caused White Flight out of the L A School district. The blacks didn’t learn anything better than before. The cost of the busses & drivers & fuel and maintenance cots millions of dollars. It was and still is a fiasco.

Now they will decimate the military with this law.

I predict a mass resignation by all branches of the military when their current tours are up.

Those who are in for 15-30 eays will leave & tht will be an instant BRAIN DRAIN of the finest of the finest in the world.


23 posted on 12/18/2010 3:25:17 PM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner

I agree. My guess is that the lawsuits (discrimination, unequal accommodation, spousal rights, etc.) begin as soon as the ink has dried. The military will be unable to extricate itself from all the litigation. We will be defenseless.


24 posted on 12/18/2010 3:26:11 PM PST by ElayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: trisham

All I can see is the fiends in human form in DC and other positions of power are cruisin’ for a bruisin’.

And I mean by mother nature.


25 posted on 12/18/2010 3:26:19 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Indeed, “code pink” will be the new “code red”. This problem will be dealt with by those directly involved. No worries there. My advice to homosexuals is don’t buy the hype...you’re better off making dresses, cutting hair, or interior decorating. Oh, and making movies.


26 posted on 12/18/2010 3:26:24 PM PST by Mich Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner

It can and I believe will have a lot to do with the ones having an LGBT agenda and by repealing DADT it gives them the inroad.


27 posted on 12/18/2010 3:27:24 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Wait until the homosexuals start wanting on base quarters together as couples. Housing for families will be interesting when you turn society upsidedown. There are enough issues for couples in the military. This will become a huge problem. Congress shloud have left don’t ask don’t tell in place. They have now opened a pandora’s box. How much time did Scott Brown really serve on active duty? I am thinking he was never in the trenches much.


28 posted on 12/18/2010 3:27:40 PM PST by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
‘Tis only the beginning. We expect so much of our combat forces, and now this?

Just as the old media ignored the impact of the homosexuality of PFC Manning, no stories will appear there of the harm done to the best fighting force in history. Still, the word will get out despite an old media blackout.

In 2012 the homoerotic rat party will wish it was 2010 all over again.

29 posted on 12/18/2010 3:27:47 PM PST by Jacquerie (Get out of my face and get back in the closet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Absolutely agree.


30 posted on 12/18/2010 3:28:39 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“I’ll venture a guess the accident rate for in-your-face homosexuals in the military will high.”

And sometimes fatal.


31 posted on 12/18/2010 3:29:13 PM PST by nolongerademocrat ("Before you ask G-d for something, first thank G-d for what you already have." B'rachot 30b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Robert Gates, under Republicans or Democrats, was and is a NWO Marxofascist tool.


32 posted on 12/18/2010 3:29:13 PM PST by unspun (It's the Sovereignty, Stu... um... art. | We are Gulag Bound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Did they repeal article 125 or the UCMJ?

Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)

ART. 125. SODOMY

(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.

(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.


33 posted on 12/18/2010 3:29:48 PM PST by SubMareener (Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner

Spot on!


34 posted on 12/18/2010 3:30:19 PM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Not just accidents, but any number of murderous, violent crimes that have *NOTHING* to do with their homosexuality. Not a bit. No sir.

Because if the homosexual is beaten to death because of their perversion, the entire command will be punished, and likely there will be extra punishment for the murderer; instead, the homicide will be blamed on anything else.

And even the murderer will agree that getting the typical 3 years for homicide in the course of robbery is far better than 7 years because the victim was in a “protected class.”

Apparently, BTW, not “protected” enough.

The truly funny thing is that the big advocates of having homosexuals in the military do not care one bit if those homosexuals who are identified are murdered. In fact, the advocates are probably all in favor of homosexuals being murdered by soldiers, because the advocates can then call them “martyrs”.

Martyrs for the cause of forcing the homosexual agenda on others.

The bottom line is that many in our military are very capable in inflicting destruction and harm to the enemy. All the repeal of DADT will accomplish is for “the enemy” to be redefined.

“The enemy” will now be al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and homosexuals.


35 posted on 12/18/2010 3:32:03 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldironsides
Brown has said the rescue efforts of Army National Guard during the Northeastern United States blizzard of 1978 impressed him. He joined the Massachusetts Army National Guard when he was 19, receiving his basic training at Fort Dix, New Jersey,[14] and attending Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) classes at the campus of Northeastern University.[19] He has been active in the Guard for about 30 years and has risen to the rank of lieutenant colonel. Presently serving as the Army Guard's head defense attorney in New England, Brown defends Guard members who have disciplinary difficulties such as positive drug tests,[2] and provides estate planning and real estate advice to those who are about to deploy to war zones.[19]

Expressing regret that he will soon be forced to retire from the Guard,[20] Brown has said: "I'm probably one of the most qualified soldiers in the entire Massachusetts [Guard].... I have enlisted service, I have infantry, quartermaster, JAG, I'm airborne qualified, I've been to all the courses."[14]

He has not served in Iraq or Afghanistan, but Brown said he was prepared to go if called. "I go where they order me to go... I'm just proud to serve and be part of the team."[2] He spent ten days to two weeks with the Guard in Kazakhstan and a week in Paraguay.[2]

36 posted on 12/18/2010 3:32:04 PM PST by jessduntno (Care what the Left thinks of you? "Their opinion of me and my policies is irrelevant." - Dick Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Pure evil and degeneracy have now taken hold of our military. No decent Christian or moral citizen should have anything to do with the institution. That it comes to this, as a lifetime supporter of the armed forces, makes my jaw drop. But that’s the reality of the times.


37 posted on 12/18/2010 3:32:14 PM PST by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
In the course of our review we heard from a very large number of Service members about their discomfort with...gay or lesbian…

The” very large number” be damned, the political directive was handed down.

Just as perverse as some guy saying, “I won the election and so I do not have to qualify as prescribed by the Constitution”.

Perhaps the military now realizes the Lakin case was decided a few days too soon.

38 posted on 12/18/2010 3:33:14 PM PST by frog in a pot (The nation is under attack and the only people on his enemies list are Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I guess they had better start letting men and women bunk and shower together too, then. Why not? I thought the point was to not have the distraction of being attracted to each other get in the way of living the Military life. I am heartbroken for straight men in our Military. They are the latest casualty in the Great Socialist Social Experiment.


39 posted on 12/18/2010 3:33:24 PM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Shitstorm in progress. Gates is a disgrace and should be run out on a rail!


40 posted on 12/18/2010 3:33:43 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Nuke the corrupt commie bastards to HELL!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

That’s why soap on a rope was invented!


41 posted on 12/18/2010 3:36:45 PM PST by jrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

SO much to say about this:
I would ask this....are heterosexual soldiers or marines required to shower, or share barracks with those who are naturally attracted to them, i.e. women? Of course not. In fact, it is not allowed because it is assumed that these men would be focused more on getting with the women than doing their jobs. But somehow, it’s okay ...in a voluntary military...to require men to share quarters with those who are attracted to men. Somehow, heterosexual men are stereotyped as unable to control themselves when seeing a naked woman....but we are to believe that homosexual men are above all that...they all know how to behave themselves in these situations. IN the meantime, we have Private Manning who traitorously uploads military secrets because he is upset about a love gone bad...and no one hears about it. BUt then....Obama wants to reduce the military anyway, so threats of people leaving don’t bother him in the least. Gives more money to his social programs


42 posted on 12/18/2010 3:36:49 PM PST by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

maybe start the fragging in D.C.


43 posted on 12/18/2010 3:39:09 PM PST by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Gates, Texas A&M called. They want you to take their name off your resume.


44 posted on 12/18/2010 3:39:14 PM PST by Terry Mross ( Reagan made one mistake: He chose Bush as his veep. We've been paying for it ever since.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Shitstorm in progress. Gates is a disgrace and should be run out on a rail!

AMEN to that!

Noone can convince me that Gates didn't stay on for this very reason, he and Zer0 deserve each other.

45 posted on 12/18/2010 3:40:59 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Arlis
Yes, and following this logic, all males and females in the service should be forced to shower together as well!

You might want to sit down for this one (if you're not already). Here is WA State, they have been replacing old National Guard armories with newer facilities. It's bad enough that these facilities are shared with civilian agencies. Worst still, in at least one new armory I know of, there is a single locker room for both genders. I am serious. Evil is afoot in America.

46 posted on 12/18/2010 3:41:37 PM PST by matt1234 (0bama's bunker phase: Nov. 2010 - Jan. 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

PS-I hate ‘working groups’. They are nothing but a vehicle to give cover to and pretend to validate what ‘community organizers’ already want anyway.


47 posted on 12/18/2010 3:41:59 PM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I think every “yes” voter should get a rubber dildo in their stocking, and perhaps a male blow-up doll with back door entry. They’re a bunch of girly-men afraid to stand up for our military (but apparently not afraid to bend over for it). K-Y jellies all around!

Fags.


48 posted on 12/18/2010 3:43:21 PM PST by Mich Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

During Viet Nam many gays admitted they were gay to avoid being drafted. Now it will be straight people who will object and rightfully so. Will the courts rule that a man must live and shower with another man who wants him sexually? Not saying this will always be the case but you know it will come up every now and then. No pun intended.


49 posted on 12/18/2010 3:43:41 PM PST by Terry Mross ( Reagan made one mistake: He chose Bush as his veep. We've been paying for it ever since.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Gates, and all 8 alleged Republicans who voted for this abomination.


50 posted on 12/18/2010 3:43:42 PM PST by MizSterious ("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson