Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enterprise

DADT itself was a compromise.

It was a compromise crafted to give gays a way to serve in the military and not face expulsion or discipline or discrimination.

Just keep your mouth shut about your sexual leanings.

That was all that was asked of them.

But that wasn’t enough. They want to be able to broadcast to the whole world about their perversions.
And yes, I do think it is a perversion.


39 posted on 12/18/2010 7:59:15 PM PST by djf (Touch my junk and I'll break yur mug!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: djf

I agree. DADT was a compromise, but liberals always get their foot in the door until the time they can get what they want. I would prefer an outright ban on homosexuals serving in the military.


43 posted on 12/18/2010 8:04:56 PM PST by Enterprise (TSA - The Silly Agency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: djf
They want to be able to broadcast to the whole world about their perversions.

Well now Congress says that's ok. I suggest they try it and see where it gets them.

59 posted on 12/18/2010 9:00:20 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Inspiration. The momentary cessation of stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: djf
DADT itself was a compromise.

Chip, chip, chip. Progressive incramentalism on display yeat again for everyone to see. These people are very patient. 17 years to get this one through.

I wonder if this means they'll do away with separate bathing facilities for male and female soldiers? Sexual orientation doesn't matter, right?

75 posted on 12/19/2010 6:31:58 AM PST by Thermalseeker (If I print money it's counterfeiting. If the Fed prints money it's quantitative easing?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson