Skip to comments.Supremes facing eligibility challenge to Obama, again (It won't go away)
Posted on 12/19/2010 2:31:41 AM PST by RobinMasters
It just doesn't appear to be going away.
The idea that Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, and do chores such as appointing Supreme Court justices, needs to be explored and documented is headed back to the highest court in the land.
According to the Supreme Court's own website, there is scheduled to be a conference Jan. 7, 2011, on a case submitted by Orly Taitz.
This particular case has had a long proceeding; it began as a challenge to the legality of the military orders under Obama, whose eligibility to hold the office of president never has been documented to date. While that officer, Capt. Connie Rhodes, ultimately followed her orders, the attorney was fined $20,000 in the case, and it continued its path through the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals and now is pending in Washington.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Anything which undos the evil this Marxist bastard is doing to America is to be welcomed.
I am more convinced every day that the only way to handle this thing is at the state level. If even one or two conservative state legislatures can vote to require that candidates provide documentary proof of natural born citizenship, 0 might be gone after one term for that reason alone.
Ditto to what you say but did you also see what the eight RINO’s did in the senate with DADT?
re: only way to handle this thing is at the state level
I think you are correct. What if a state could find something to decline to do claiming he’s not eligible to be in the office. Find some bill he’s signed that requires them to do something specific, and then simply notify the powers that be that they will not be doing it.
I quite agree that having one or two states require proof of eligibility would do it, but maybe there’s a quicker way to handle it.
I woder if the Supreme Court justices fear the media enough to give Obama a free pass?,the smut slinger media saves it’s best ammo for last.
I think a lot of states will be refusing mandates...if one could attach the eligibility question to their objections, that might help.
I do think that legislating documentary reqirements would be the quickest for getting rid of him. I can’t see the courts doing anything about him before 11/12, if ever-—”a political question” will be their main excuse. And the federal courts are gun shy about politics after Bush/Gore even though SCOTUS was absolutely right about it.
Either the certificate is being withheld because: 1) he wasn't born in Hawaii, 2) there is other embarrassing information on it, 3) the issue is being cynically, and with great effort, kept alive as a "tar baby" to distract us, or 4) any combination of the proceeding three points.
You best hope is that fifty years from now someone will write a book...
This matter was wrongly and finally decided in January 2009.
To retroactively diqualify the Obama administration at this point in time might cause the U.S. government to collapse.
Regardless of the fact that Obama is obviously not constitutionally qualified to serve as POTUS, SCOTUS will never acknowlege that reality.
Once he is REMOVED (that really sounds so good) will every appointment he made be null & void?
“will every appointment he made be null & void?”
Yes, and also every law and treaty he signed.
If he is legal, it would take mere seconds to prove it.
I have to agree, however the prospect of Joe Biden is not a good one either.
I suspect the Supremes are shy of this one, and that they would prefer to drag the issue out until after Bam Bam and the wookie are out of the WH.
I love that idea, but the problem would be that the states that would pass this would be red states that Obama can’t win anyway. Now if we could get Florida, Ohio, North Carolina then that would be a way to work this. But if it is Texas, Utah, Montana, Idaho we might not make as great an impression.
“To retroactively disqualify the Obama administration at this point in time might cause the U.S. government to collapse.”
I’ve been saying this for awhile now. I think the powers that be have known this since the beginning. If it were revealed that he is not eligible then everything he has done for the last 2 years would have to be reversed.
SCOTUS is afraid to take a chance on the truth!