Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumor: Sestak to Challenge Casey in Dem Primary
NEPArtisan ^ | 12/17/2010 | Tom Borthwick

Posted on 12/19/2010 4:04:51 PM PST by surroundedbyblue

From one of my sources higher up in state and national Democratic circles, the word is that Joe Sestak, who just barely lost against Pat Toomey in the US Senate race, will be challenging Bob Casey in 2012.

Sestak successfully knocked off Senator Arlen Spector in a primary challenge this past year, hitting him from the left. Presumably, since Casey is often billed as a conservative Democrat (but is really more of a moderate), Sestak will be doing the same thing in 2012. He likely thinks he can do it again.

Currently, Sestak is on a 67 county “Thank You” tour. In fact, he’ll be in Scranton at the AFSCME Union Hall at 3 PM this Saturday. This tells me he doesn’t want people forgetting him. There’s nothing statewide he can really run for until this race anyway. 2014 for Governor and 2016 for a Toomey rematch. Evidently that’s too long for Sestak to wait.

(Excerpt) Read more at nepartisan.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: casey; sestak
Fodder for thought
1 posted on 12/19/2010 4:04:53 PM PST by surroundedbyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

(but is really more of a moderate)

LOL, he’s a liberal!


2 posted on 12/19/2010 4:07:31 PM PST by Cisco Nix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

There’s no penalty for knocking off a turncoat traitor like Specter. They use those guys up and throw them away.

Knocking off a sitting Democrat, son of a Democrat, would seem to be a different kettle of fish. I shouldn’t think the state party would be too happy about this.


3 posted on 12/19/2010 4:10:06 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

He won’t have Christine O’Donnell to run against in ‘12.


4 posted on 12/19/2010 4:11:06 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

The question is which of the two would it be easier for us to unseat, Sestak or Casey.


5 posted on 12/19/2010 4:11:54 PM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: abb

If the country’s mood is still conservative in 2012, then I’d think it would be easier to beat Sestak than Casey. Especially if they have a divisive primary.

Casey pretends to be socially conservative when he most certainly is not. But he seems to be good at getting away with it.


6 posted on 12/19/2010 4:14:36 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: abb

Probably Sestak. He’s not the son of a former governor (or however Casey is related)


7 posted on 12/19/2010 4:15:13 PM PST by abercrombie_guy_38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

Casey is a liberal who won on his fathers merits. The man is both ignorant and a liar.


8 posted on 12/19/2010 4:15:46 PM PST by linn37 ( "The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

“The question is which of the two would it be easier for us to unseat, Sestak or Casey.”

In my opinion, Casey would be the easier to beat. Sestak had enormous support from the left which caught alot of swing voters. In fact, he almost beat Toomey. Casey has been a do-nothing Senator & that will irritate people. His piss poor record would make him an easier target than Sestak. Just my opinion of course.


9 posted on 12/19/2010 4:16:22 PM PST by surroundedbyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

Don’t underestimate the Casey name in Pennsylvania.


10 posted on 12/19/2010 4:23:36 PM PST by bjcoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bjcoop

Very true.


11 posted on 12/19/2010 4:27:09 PM PST by surroundedbyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue
Joe Sestak, who just barely lost against disappointingly pro-homosexual Pat Toomey

There. Fixed it.

12 posted on 12/19/2010 4:39:57 PM PST by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

Is Sestak pronounced Shestack?


13 posted on 12/19/2010 5:20:03 PM PST by MIchaelTArchangel (Obama makes me miss Jimmah Cahtah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Right you are!!! And the pro-Sonia Sotomayor Toomey. I’m having my doubts about Toomey. I’m cautiously optimistic. Key word: cautious.


14 posted on 12/19/2010 5:28:26 PM PST by surroundedbyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cisco Nix

Casey is often billed as a conservative Democrat but is really more of a embarrassment to this Pennsylvanian.


15 posted on 12/19/2010 5:55:03 PM PST by flowerplough (Thomas Sowell: Those who look only at Obama's deeds tend to become Obama's critics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

“...a different kettle of fish...”

Oh yes, assuming Casey remains popular in PA, Sestak would really be wasting his time.

I’m glad he defeated Spector, Spector was a rat-fink in many ways.

Casey is of course not the man his father was, but I don’t see how Sestak gets any traction against him. Esp. considering the results of this election, it doesn’t seem Pennsy will be clamoring for more liberal reps, although that might be a wrong assessment for the dem primaries.


16 posted on 12/19/2010 6:02:03 PM PST by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue
Issa has a lot of questions-subpoenaed and under oath--for Sestak first about the bribe Obama offered him to drop his challenge to Specter--felony criminal questions.
17 posted on 12/19/2010 6:12:25 PM PST by Happy Rain ("Every Christmas the Leftist atheists become "hatetheists.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

Maybe he can shake a job offer out of Obama/Clinton if he threatens to challenge Casey?


18 posted on 12/19/2010 7:43:15 PM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

Casey has been a loyal(LIBERAL) Democrat. If Sestak challenges him he will receive NO support from Democrats in PA. Having said that, I HOPE he does run from the left against Casey. The MONEY spent would be drained from the GENERAL election against a Republican.


19 posted on 12/19/2010 7:54:11 PM PST by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson