Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
Posted on 12/19/2010 4:16:27 PM PST by GiovannaNicoletta
Acting quietly, below the radar of U.S. public opinion and without congressional approval, the Obama administration is implementing a key policy objective of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP, to erase the border with Mexico and Canada.
The administration is acting under a State Department-declared policy initiative described in a March 23 fact sheet titled "United States-Mexico Partnership: A New Border Vision."
"Mexico and the United States have a shared interest in creating a 21st century border that promotes the security and prosperity of both countries," the State Department declared. "The U.S. and Mexican governments have launched a range of initiatives that challenge the traditional view of 'hold the line' and are developing a framework for a new vision of 21st century border management."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
New World order on its way, if we are to survive, we need to kick obammas butt in everything he does, get rid of czars, we need to make him accountable..
Border management? What is that? Something certainly foreign to the U.S. government and that of Mexico, at least.
Actually, this “initiative” has been bouncing around even before the Bush administration amongst liberals of all sorts. But as always, who would end up paying for the consequences of such insanity?
Yes, that’s right.....
Yes, there is no border anymore between Vermont and Maine.
This goes nowhere with a new House full of conservatives. It would be helpful, however, that Washington permanently tie the hands of the North American globalists, so that these scary scenarios do not reappear in the future.
The czar business and special committees and appointees with the ability of bypassing Congress has got to go, and go beyond defunding, actually booted up into the arena of unconstitutional, even sedition.
Such a move needs to be sold solidly to the American people over the course of the next two years while they are plenty disgusted with the mode of operation by the Pelosi/Obama/Reid trio. It is fresh on the our mind and is unappreciated. We need to do something with that besides sit on it.
I thought New Hampshire was always in between.
I'm sure there's a punch line in there somewhere -but I'm to dense to get it - wanna 'splain, please?
I thought New Hampshire was always in between
No. It’s that New Hampshire goes both ways. (DADT)
It is part of the FREEMASONS NWO map, that a woman bought from a store window in Philadelphia, around the time of The Great Depression.
Africa already has their African Union in place, and the only one not participating is Morocco.
The North American Union is Canada, US and Mexico.....several of our Presidents including Clinton and Bush have signed their approval of it....I guess they are either freemasons, or just think opposing it would be in vain. It tells me Obama is on the NWO bandwagon, in high gear.
sfl
Don’t be so sure, if any of the Republicans are Freemasons, then this NWO plan will be approved. This has been in NWO plans for more than two hundred years.
Hilary is in charge of this one. I say we open trade with Canada. Our illegals for oil.
The Mexican government is increasingly unable to govern, which mean Mexico is slowly becoming a failed state. Erasing a border with a failed state doesn’t make any sense (not that liberals are known for making sense). Another possibility is that we occupy large portions of northern Mexico.
Less than two weeks to go before George W. Bush’s nefarious plan to form the North American Union and introduce the Amero passes its deadline.
Another possibility is that we occupy large portions of northern Mexico.
Are you kidding? Who the heck wants to annex that dung pile? We have enough problems here. Send All Illegals home so they can deal with their failed government.
The House has no purview over foreign affairs.
All treaty relationships are subject to only Senate approval.
It’s called the NAU (North American Union) All done without the permission of the American people. He’ll start border wars if he’s not careful. Then he’ll turn our own military on us.
I’m not eager to do it either, but its better than having an open border with a failed state. A much better approach would be to have a 30 mile strip of “No Man’s Land” along the border. Would never happen though.
ping
Well, unfortunately, and as with all liberal agendas, it actually does make sense as a deliberate plan... if you're willing to face the horror of it's inescapable meaning.
you’d have to be delusional to actually believe this.
how do the people feel about this in the 3 nations involved + all the South American nations? I do not believe the people want this in any nations involved.
“...It tells me Obama is on the NWO bandwagon, in high gear.”
::::::::::::::
Obama is on ANY bandwagon that is “anti-American individual greatness”....his agenda has not changed since way before the election. He has not stopped working to destroy the American Constitutional republic since then.
He appears on the Dennis Miller radio program now and then, otherwise he’s been focused more on the Obama-Kenya connection.
ALL FUNDING of the federal government starts in the House of Representatives..
The Senate provides over sight and the president can only VETO..
SLAP... SLAP... wake up..
No need to annex. Just establish a DMZ like the Koreans and fire into it every so often to discourage invaders.
Maybe that’s how he came up with 57 states.
He’s going to regionalize us into 57 chunks of New World Order lumped in with parts of Mexico and Canada and just got ahead of himself a little.
Obama....seems to be more like George W Bush everyday....a Liberal Free Trader Open Borders Globalist.
I think the President is really Obushma
Maine was, in the early 1600’s, part of the Acadian Provence - and then, If I remember correctly, Britain included it as part of the grant to Plymouth Co - 5 of my ancestors, including Gov. Bradford and JOhn Alden, established a trading post as far up the coast as Castine and inland, up the Kennebec, at what is now our capitol, in Augusta.
France and Britain scrapped over it for some years until Britain took over in the 1700’s and tt was part of Massachusetts until it became a state in 1820.
It was never part of New Hampshire that I ever heard about - altho’ part of New Hampshire = between what is now Maine and Mass., may have been part of Mass. Not sure about that.
Welcome to FreeRepublic. Your first post ever is to suggest a long time poster is delusional?
Your stay may not be long.
You are absolutely right.
aha - but Territory of Maine was never contiguus with Massachusetts, something akin to former Territory Alaska being a part of USA but not contiguus. A piece of New Hampshire separated Mass and Maine- cf maps of 1776. Not only that but Maine appears to also been part of New York:
viz: `In 1678 the provincial government of New York, which controlled Maine between 1677 and 1686...`
http://www.mainememory.net/sitebuilder/site/897/page/1308/display?page=3
And Massachusetts didn`t own NH until 1652, up to which time Gorges appears to have owned it 1640-1643
Since the border between Maine and Masachusetts never existed, and since Vermont was a part of New Hampshire and did not exist until 1791,
And Vermont borders on Massachusetts, and Maine doesn`t,
but New Hampshire which contained Vermont in 1790, bordered on Maine,
ERGO Vermont,being New Hampshire or vice versa,
bordered on Maine,but now doesn`t.
Acting quietly, below the radar of U.S. public opinion and without congressional approval, the Obama administration is implementing a key policy objective of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP, to erase the border with Mexico and Canada.
The administration is acting under a State Department-declared policy initiative described in a March 23 fact sheet titled "United States-Mexico Partnership: A New Border Vision."
"...and are developing a framework for a new vision of 21st century border management."
No way
Bttt
you’d have to be delusional to actually believe this.
With this President you have to expect ANYTHING. Everything we thought was “delusional” has already come true. Fool us once shame on you, fool us twice, shame on us. At this point one would have to be delusional NOT to believe it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.