Skip to comments.Barney Frank: ‘Let Me Own Up’ to the ‘Radical Homosexual Agenda’
Posted on 12/22/2010 1:04:47 PM PST by Sub-Driver
Barney Frank: Let Me Own Up to the Radical Homosexual Agenda Wednesday, December 22, 2010 By Nicholas Ballasy
(CNSNews.com) - When speaking at the enrollment ceremony for the repeal of Dont Ask, Dont Tell, the law banning homosexuals from serving openly in the armed forces, Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) had a message for those worried about the radical homosexual agenda.
Four years ago, a Republican running for Congress in Indiana said dont vote for his Democratic opponent because if he won, Nancy Pelosi would become speaker and she would let me enact the radical homosexual agenda, Rep. Frank told the audience on Tuesday.
So, let me own up to that agenda. Its to be protected against violent crimes driven by bigotry. Its to be able to get married. Its to be able to get a job and its to be able to fight for our country. Hey, for those, for those who are worried about the radical homosexual agenda, let me put them on notice two down, two to go.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
That's kind of IN YOUR FACE don't you think, Barney?! What happened to reaching across the isle? /s
Bary Frank - Unashamed Defender of Perversity.
This will come to war. I see no alternative.
He’s right...they are at the door. They have only a few more items on their list. And, since this younger generation has bought the lie (that homosexuality is the “civil rights issue” of their day), they will roll through those too.
Enjoy it while you can, sodomite.
We’re coming to take it from you. And then we’re gonna drive you freaks back where you belong...underground.
Barney Frank is every bit an enemy to this country as al-Qaeda, as far as I’m concerned.
It is a cry of triumph.
Filthy sodomites will rue the day.
This guy sure is acting cocky for a fool that is about to lose his balls in a little over a week.
And if we can't get together as a voting bloc and get rid of the current administration, and most of the dem/lib/prog/pop legislators....they're going to get the other two.
It won't be long at all until our - now charming - military gays (now armed as well) demand true, legal marital status with the comensurate benefits for their "spouses".
Remember: you heard it here first.
One of this poofters accomplishments was to set a male prostitution ring in his capitol hill townhouse when he first “came” to congress.
Regardless of what people say, people are NOT born gay. Its a lifestyle they choose - unlike someone who is born black, etc.
No one can change the color of their skin, but, many have quit the homosexual lifestyle. So, it should be obvious that one isn’t born that way. Scientists haven’t discovered a homosexual gene. And, I’m sick of the term gay. There isn’t anything gay about their perversion. Its sick.
Pandora’s Box has been irrevocably opened, and the jack has been set free... look for bigotry from the left as you’ve never seen before. Anyone opposing homosexuality will soon be faced with criminal charges while perverts operate schools for our children. America is no more...
He was given a boy-toy executive at Fannie Mae to look the other way over the bad accounting they were running up.
His corruption helped bring about this economic state we are in. My feelings are that it was a deliberate act.
want to know what is #1 on their list?
I wonder if people are "born gay"; are some "born bisexual"?
Once again the “Anus of the House” emits his usual verbal effluvia.
The “gene” claim is just a red herring. Something to get some people “go along to get along”.
The homosexual agenda is the battering ram for the sex positive agenda. The goal is to end ALL moral judgements over ALL sexual pairings, regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s). Doesn’t matter if it is “genetic” or just a whim. They believe anyone should be able to “do it” when they want, with whatever they want.
They see sex as a birthright to be enjoyed by everyone at every age without moral judgement. Smash monogamy. They oppose abstinence, not because “it doesn’t work”, but because it establishes sexual “restraint” in acting on desires. They call that “unhealthy”. They find it an obstacle to arriving at their end.