Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Right to self-defense not limited
paysonroundup.com ^ | 21 December, 2010 | Tina Terry

Posted on 12/22/2010 7:02:15 PM PST by marktwain

While I support the conclusion of Robert Kraniak’s letter (“Right to keep and bear arms is most important amendment”), I would like to gently correct Mr. Kraniak’s assertion that my letter regarding Bill of Rights Day contained an “oversight in not mentioning the most important amendment” — the Second Amendment.

The Roundup has a 400-word limit for its letters; it was almost impossible to adequately address the importance of the whole of the Bill of Rights within this limit. Nonetheless, I did clearly cite the right to self-defense as one of the rights that the Bill of Rights protects; the only amendment that addresses this right is the Second Amendment — which, it should be noted — and this was clearly no accident — the Founders listed right after the First Amendment, and before any of the other amendments constituting the Bill of Rights.

In their writings, the Founders also repeatedly made it clear that the inalienable right to self-defense was not limited to the right of the individual to protect him or herself against attacks by individual criminals, but also for citizens to defend themselves against tyrannical government(s).

To further clarify my position, all of the Web sites I cited in my letter relating to the Bill of Rights are those of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO.org) — a tax exempt educational organization that has, for many years, been the most visible promoter of celebrating Bill of Rights Day around the country. One does not need to be Jewish to belong to JPFO — I have been a member for almost 19 years.

I have strong, personal reasons for supporting the Bill of Rights and the Second Amendment: For 17 years, between 1960 and 1977, my family lived in Kingston, Jamaica. Around 1972, the Jamaican government declared martial law, and summarily confiscated all civilian-owned firearms and ammunition.

My description of living through this frightening experience, and the indelible lessons I learned from it about the importance of the Bill of Rights in general, and the Second Amendment in particular, were published by JPFO in 1998, and can be read on the organization’s Web site at: http://jpfo.org/ filegen-a-m/jamaica.htm

I hope Mr. Kraniak and others who support the Bill of Rights will consider joining and supporting JPFO.

Tina Terry


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; constitution; defense; jamaica
Jamaica now has one of the highest murder rates in the world.
1 posted on 12/22/2010 7:02:19 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Right to self-defense not limited

Does that include ex-felons with rights restored upon completion of sentence? That's the trap that led us into background checks, buy-by-mail, and all the other restrictions that followed...

Once you start infringing a right, there is NO definitive end to the "infringement" and you just have to go along with the result.

2 posted on 12/22/2010 8:20:18 PM PST by Clint Williams ( America -- a great idea, didn't last. The only reasonable response to jihad is Crusade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The Second is only operative if we USE it from time to time. We are far too lax in this regard.


3 posted on 12/22/2010 8:23:24 PM PST by Dead Corpse (III%. The last line in the sand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams
Once the terms of your confinement/penalty are up, you should be under no further disability.

If you are that dangerous that you can never again be trusted amongst the rest of the population, we should be executing you instead of supporting you in a cage for life.

4 posted on 12/22/2010 8:25:08 PM PST by Dead Corpse (III%. The last line in the sand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams

If a person in prison cannot be trusted with a firearm and a car upon release, why would you release them? They can either with one quick robbery...


5 posted on 12/22/2010 8:25:18 PM PST by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams
Does that include ex-felons with rights restored upon completion of sentence?

It once did. But it's conceivable that the individual sentence could include a lifetime ban for that individual. That would pass Constitutional measure, for rights can be taken away through individual due process. For the length of confinement, or forever.

Do I think that wise? Not in general, but I can imagine specific instances where it would be.

6 posted on 12/22/2010 9:02:56 PM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson