Posted on 12/23/2010 5:26:27 AM PST by IbJensen
Back in 2004, in one of his most recognized messages to America, Osama bin Laden, responding to then President George Bush Jr.'s claims that Al Qaeda hates freedom, rhetorically asked, "If so [if Al Qaeda hates freedom], let him [Bush] explain to us why we have not attacked Sweden, for example."
Days ago, on December 11, an Al Qaeda affiliated suicide bomber attacked Swedenthe first terrorist attack in Sweden in three decades, and its first ever suicide attack. The attempt largely failed (only the bomber died, two Swedes were injured). Even so, it "could have been truly catastrophic," said one official.
So much for Sweden epitomizing Al Qaeda's "respect" for freedom. Why the change in policy? In fact, according to an audio-recording issued by the terrorists minutes before the attack, the vitriol is such that "all Mujahadeen [jihadists] in Europe and Sweden" are to prepare for action: "Now is the time to strike, don't wait any longer."
Would-be future jihadists were further advised to attack with "whatever you have, even if it is a knife"a bag of nails was found near the body of the suicide bomberindicating that the jihadists may have been taking lessons from Al Qaeda's popular online magazine, Inspire, which, among other things, offers creative tips on how to transform household items into lethal weapons.
As for motives, according to the audio-recording, there are three: Sweden will be a target of the jihad "as long as you do not [1] end your war against Islam and [2] humiliation of the Prophet and [3] your stupid support for the pig Vilks."
The first point"war against Islam"appears to be a reference to Sweden's 500 troop presence in Afghanistan. Yet Sweden is only one of nearly fifty countriesincluding Muslim onesto have a presence in Afghanistan; Turkey alone has contributed nearly four times as many troops. And most of these nations have not (yet) been targeted. Moreover, Sweden has been a troop contributing nation since July 24, 2003well over a year before Osama portrayed it as a neutral country, undeserving of attack. (Perhaps he meant Switzerland, which is known for its neutrality, and is often conflated with Sweden by Middle Easterners?)
The second and third reasons cited"humiliation of the Prophet" and "support for Vilks"are one and the same and, in fact, the immediate reason behind the attack. Context: back in 2007, Swedish artist Lars Vilks drew unflattering caricatures of the Muslim prophet Muhammad. Since then, Al Qaeda has set a bounty on him (the reward increases if he is "slaughtered like a lamb"); he has already been physically assaulted and his house nearly burned down.
Swedish freedom of speech and expression, then, is what prompted the attack. In fact, eliminating Western freedomsor at least conforming them to the dictates of sharia law, which, among other things, forbid mockery of Muhammadis a longstanding Islamist goal. Nor is it limited to violence; rather, the West's very legal system is being exploited, through Islamist "lawfare" designed to censor free speech concerning Islam (prompting countermeasures such as the Middle East Forum's Legal Project).
More generally speaking, when assessing why jihadists attack this or that country, there are other factors to consider, such as capability and timing ("Now is the time to strike, don't wait any longer," said the recording). The fact is, from an Islamist point of view, Sweden has long been deserving of attack, simply for contributing the 500 troops to Afghanistanjust as the nearly fifty contributing nations are all fair game.
More to the point, even the most neutral country that has no dealings with Islam is a potential target; if and when it gets attacked is based on if and when the Islamic world resurrects the caliphateagain, capability and timing being the ultimate determinants. Once a militarily capable caliphate is established, offensive jihad to subject the world to Islamic dominion becomes no less obligatory than stifling mockery of Muhammad. In short, it is not about what this or that country does; Islamist animosity for infidels is intrinsic, kept at bay only by circumstance.
And so, to respond to Osama bin Laden's 2004 question "why we [Al Qaeda] have not attacked Sweden," the answer isbecause the time was not quite right then.
The brains of the insanity need to be eliminated.
There was an explosion at the Swiss embassy in Rome today, severely injuring the doorman. These devotees to the ROP love to blow people up at Christmas. They’d be outraged if similar attacks took place on Mecca during the hadj.
> Theyd be outraged if similar attacks took place on Mecca
> during the hadj.
Mecca must be completely and utterly destroyed. The pedophile pirate Mohammed said that Mecca would never be destroyed. What better way to discredit this genocidal savage and his death cult?
Obliterating Mecca during the hadj would send an additional symbolic message.
The Swedes should deport all Muslims. They are a small country and could easily become overrun. When that happens, all non-Muslim Swedes will literally become prisoners in their own country.
WTF are they waiting for?
The multi-culti, socialist paradise of Sweden that the Left extols wakes up from its dream and comes face-to-face with a nightmare.
One Trident missile launched from a submarine sitting in the Indian Ocean (or Arabian Sea for that matter) and it would all be over in a few minutes.....hmmmmmmmm.....of course the mohammedans would go mad (or madder?): riot, and attempt to kill and destroy any and all non-believers in their midst, however that would backfire quickly enough.
I suggest we deport all of them peacefully back to their homelands and everyone would be left to their own device, or we push the button.....now that would be an interesting proposal to our ROP followers.
There is no way that the death cult can co exist peacefully alongside normal people. They must all be sent back to where they came from.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.