Bunch of morons chiming in to defend Pollard.
I’m calling IBTZ, just in case.
Rather than engage in ad hominem attack, why not respond with a reasoned argument against the points people are making?
For example, if his punishment is way out of proportion by any comparison to other espionage cases, why is that not a fair reason to advocate for clemency after 25 years?
If it turns out he was blamed for things he didn’t do, such as turning over information that caused the death of American spies, why is that not a fair reason to consider clemency?
Again, so you don’t feel compelled to call me a moron, I am not saying Pollard is a good guy, a hero, a patriot or someone who did not deserve to be punished. I’m just saying, there is a punishment that fits the crime and Pollard has paid that price with interest.