Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Army Does It Differently
The Strategy Page ^ | 12/24/2010 | The Strategy Page

Posted on 12/24/2010 10:27:22 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
The third member of the Predator family is the MQ-9 Reaper. This is a 4.7 ton, 11 meter/36 foot long aircraft with a 20 meter/66 foot wingspan that looks like the MQ-1. It has six hard points, and can carry about a ton (2,400 pounds) of weapons. These include Hellfire missiles (up to eight), two Sidewinder or two AMRAAM air-to-air missiles, two Maverick missiles, or two 227 kg/500 pound smart bombs (laser or GPS guided.) Max speed is 400 kilometers an hour, and max endurance is 15 hours. The Reaper is considered a combat aircraft, to replace F-16s or A-10s in ground support missions.

Once again our Air Force is showing its apparent distain for ground support. Replace the A-10 with this thing? The UAV doesn’t even have a gun!
In Viet Nam we loved the old A-1 Skyraider. It could hang around for hours and carried a good bomb load along with four 20 mm cannons. If the fast flyers were sent to help us they’d fly in, drop their load and fly back to rearm/refuel.
Our Air Force is in love with high and fast. Low and slow works much better for ground support. It also wants everything that flys under its control. Back in the early 60s all Army fixed wing aircraft were turned over to the Air Force. It’s the same with our Navy – now they want to take over all Army ships and boats.

21 posted on 12/25/2010 5:15:49 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
The air force cannot understand the personal angle,

Yep, we just laugh at all CAS requests from those ground pukes.

Total bullshit.

Hey, how's that airspace gonna be divided up for control?

IIRC, the Army wants non-ATO aircraft to be free to operate up to 15K with ground-pounders flying them. Yeah, no hazards there. I've seen where a single aircraft in the wrong altitude blocks can cause all hell to break loose. The airspace over a combat zone can be quite crowded.

Is the solution to just have a ROZ over every ground unit engaged in combat operations? If so, it would be like every separate ground unit was fighting its own little war. No unity of effort. We've been down this road before, and it sucks.

22 posted on 12/25/2010 5:40:16 AM PST by SIDENET ("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

We don’t need towels. We never sweat.


23 posted on 12/25/2010 6:20:07 AM PST by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
It’s the same with our Navy – now they want to take over all Army ships and boats.

Just returned from Langley-Eustis complex in Southern Virginia. This is just one of 6 joint bases now in the DOD. Langley AFB and Fort Eustis have been joined and the Air Force is the lead on this amalgamation. The future that I see is the bases coming together until we have one force I guess.

24 posted on 12/25/2010 6:54:06 AM PST by BeAllYouCanBe (Until Americans love their own children more than they love Nancy Pelosi this suicide will continue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BeAllYouCanBe

http://www.jble.af.mil/


25 posted on 12/25/2010 6:55:28 AM PST by BeAllYouCanBe (Until Americans love their own children more than they love Nancy Pelosi this suicide will continue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
Back in the early 60s all Army fixed wing aircraft were turned over to the Air Force.

Not so. My father was an army aviator during that period, and flew both fixed and rotary wing (army doctrine at the time). He also commanded an aviation battalion in Vietnam, flying fixed wing aircraft, in around '68.

One bit of interest- I'm told that Dad was the first instrument qualified helicopter pilot in the army!

26 posted on 12/25/2010 7:05:03 AM PST by TexasBarak (I canceled a subscription, and used the money to become a monthly donor instead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TexasBarak

The Army in 1966 kept Beavers, Otters, and L-19 spotters. We gave up Caribou and C-123s but all helicopters stayed Army if I remember rightly.

The Army also had what ever the military twin Beech was called but only for general officer transportation.


27 posted on 12/25/2010 7:15:23 AM PST by BeAllYouCanBe (Until Americans love their own children more than they love Nancy Pelosi this suicide will continue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BeAllYouCanBe

I don’t know what this has to do with the article we are discussing but in 1966 in Vietnam I served with an NCO that was in the Army for 12 years and was in a drone unit. I was in a UH-1 unit and he was on OJT for his 12 month tour but knew he was going to go back to drones because that was his primary MOS.

So back then he talked about the capability of drones to have cameras and fire rockets and I have often wondered why we didn’t have them in Vietnam.


28 posted on 12/25/2010 7:21:58 AM PST by BeAllYouCanBe (Until Americans love their own children more than they love Nancy Pelosi this suicide will continue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BeAllYouCanBe

I don’t know what this has to do with the article we are discussing but in 1966 in Vietnam I served with an NCO that was in the Army for 12 years and was in a drone unit. I was in a UH-1 unit and he was on OJT for his 12 month tour but knew he was going to go back to drones because that was his primary MOS.

So back then he talked about the capability of drones to have cameras and fire rockets and I have often wondered why we didn’t have them in Vietnam.


29 posted on 12/25/2010 7:22:05 AM PST by BeAllYouCanBe (Until Americans love their own children more than they love Nancy Pelosi this suicide will continue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC

Since 1998 with the Joint Operational Support Airlift Center. The result has been that Navy aircraft that used to be used solely for operational lift support now routinely get pulled at the last minute for “other priorities.”


30 posted on 12/25/2010 8:21:10 AM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

What aircraft are you talking here? I was unaware, though we used to take Navy and Army aircraft from DC to Norfolk/Langley a lot.


31 posted on 12/25/2010 8:40:49 AM PST by TankerKC (Part of the Soros funded Blog Police.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
In Vietnam there was a informal pecking order for the Brown Water sailors and boots on the ground:

1. USN “Seawolf” UH-1B/C helo gunships, USN “Black Pony” OV-10 fixed wing, Army AH-1G Cobra gunship helos.

2. USMC tactical air.

3. USN tactical air.

4. USAF zoomies (who could usually drop their load on top of you if you were being overrun).

To be fair, the USAF was divided into two houses when it came to CAS (close air support): 1) the supersonic jet “zoomies” who were usually able to place their bomb loads somewhere within the province and 2) the pilots of former WW2 prop attack aircraft like the A-26K Invaders and A-1E and A-1H Skyraiders who'd come in low, slow and hot to put ordnance on target. If you were in heavy contact, you really wanted those guys in the A-26s and A-1s blasting bad guys!

In the 35 years since Vietnam fell, the aircraft have changed, but the pecking order has remained pretty much constant except the Navy has lost its light, fixed wing (OV-10) attack capability.

32 posted on 12/25/2010 9:02:55 AM PST by MasterGunner01 (To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BeAllYouCanBe

I live just a couple miles outside the gate of Eustis and retired out of there. I wouldn’t mind seeing all services combined, it might eliminate inter service rivalry – at least lessen it.


33 posted on 12/25/2010 12:56:31 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TexasBarak

It wasn’t an instant process. When I arrived in 1966 there were still a few Army C-119s and C-130s. By the time I left in 1968 all were USAF.
I shouldn’t have used the word “all”. Our Army still has a few liaison fixed wing aircraft but no cargo or troop carriers. When airlift is needed our Army still has to go hat in hand and to our Air Force.


34 posted on 12/25/2010 1:11:52 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
it might eliminate inter service rivalry – at least lessen it.

The joining doesn't appear to be without its issues. Which service owns what is a major problem and many details are being worked out. I hear that we are mixing service members in units where an AF person may be in an Army unit or vice versa. I don't think the discipline is equal.

35 posted on 12/25/2010 1:27:59 PM PST by BeAllYouCanBe (Until Americans love their own children more than they love Nancy Pelosi this suicide will continue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC

For the Navy, the logistic squadrons are required to have a certain number of aircraft available for JOSAC tasking at any one time. What would happen for my unit a lot of time is that we would get our JOSAC tasked aircraft pulled at the last minute and the same squadron would scramble to make another aircraft available for us.


36 posted on 12/25/2010 4:01:17 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BeAllYouCanBe

Fort Eustis is now a joint Army/Air Force installation, Fort Story is joint Army/Navy. Mixed units can’t be far behind.


37 posted on 12/26/2010 4:08:45 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson