Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rangel Attacks NLPC; Opens Legal Defense Fund (Sorry Charlie, it's not over yet!)
National Legal & Policy Center ^ | December 28, 2010 | Peter Flaherty

Posted on 12/28/2010 1:22:05 PM PST by jazusamo

 

Rangel photo

Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) has formally opened a legal defense fund in an apparent acknowledgement of our accusation that he illegally used almost $400,000 in PAC funds for his legal defense. According to a statement Rangel made to Politics Daily:

The repeated filings of allegations, no matter how unsubstantiated, by the National Legal Policy Committee (sic), a politically-motivated right wing group dedicated to eviscerating civil rights and labor union protections, have led me to this action.

On November 29, we filed a Complaint with the Federal Election Commission alleging that Rangel violated the Federal Election Campaign Act by using almost $400,000 in funds from his National Leadership PAC to pay legal bills related to the House Ethics Committee actions against him.

Members of Congress may use funds from their personal re-election committees for legal expenses related to their official actions. The National Leadership PAC is not Rangel's re-election committee but what is classified as a "leadership PAC," the purpose of which is make contributions to other candidates.

Rangel was censured by the full House on December 2 by a vote of  333-79. NLPC exposed Rangel's failure to disclose or pay taxes on rental income from a Dominican Republic beach house, which prompted Rangel to amend his disclosures to show hundreds of thousands in previously undisclosed income and assets. In March, Rangel resigned from his chairmanship of the Ways and Means Committee after being admonished by the House Ethics Committee for accepting corporate-funded Caribbean junkets, also exposed by NLPC.

Rangel continues to be an embarrassment to Congress. In addition to his attack on NLPC, Rangel claimed that the overwhelming censure vote was some kind of vindication:

I continue to draw satisfaction from the recently concluded Ethics Committee investigations that established that, while I committed serious violation of the rules of the House, none of those violations included corruption, intent, self-dealing, self-enrichment or quid pro quos involving any official action.

One thing Rangel does get right is his expectation of our continued scrutiny. According to Lynn Sweet in Politics Daily, Rangel sent an email to supporters that read, in part:

Many supporters have encouraged this for a while as it is becoming clear that there are those who will continue to mine and instigate further allegations.

While we welcomed the Ethics Committee investigations of matters we brought to their attention, we believe that Rangel has been engaged in additional serious corruption which we will seek to document in coming months.

Rangel's latest rant follows previous attacks on NLPC. On February 1, 2009, Rangel accused journalists of being "an arm of this organization," and asserted that reporters do NLPC's "dirty work." On August 10, 2010, Rangel made speech on the House floor and attacked NLPC. He complained:

And they followed me on vacation. They followed me when I was doing business. They're at the airport. They're outside where I live. It's kind of rough.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congress; cultureofcorruption; ethics; fec; nlpc; pelosi; rangel

1 posted on 12/28/2010 1:22:12 PM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; paltz

It becomes more and more difficult to believe that this man was a war hero in Korea (he actually was).


2 posted on 12/28/2010 1:25:06 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
The repeated filings of allegations, no matter how unsubstantiated

Sorta what Sarah went through. How does it feel ol' boy?

3 posted on 12/28/2010 1:26:20 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (demonicRATS= Obama's Mosque, taxes, painful death. Is this what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Yes, he was. He’s a prime example why there should be term limits. Looks like four decades at the trough thoroughly corrupted a once honorable man and made him feel entitled.


4 posted on 12/28/2010 1:33:08 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

Yep, Charlie throws around those crocodile tears whining about unsubstantiated claims but he’s got another surprise coming, I think NLPC is right on the money.


5 posted on 12/28/2010 1:36:45 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“The repeated filings of allegations, no matter how unsubstantiated”

So then...

That would range from “very” unsubstantiated to “not” unsubstantiated.


6 posted on 12/28/2010 1:39:21 PM PST by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

War hero? It’s not about what he did then....it’s about what he’s doing now....


7 posted on 12/28/2010 2:00:52 PM PST by Shamrock-DW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Charlie, for Peat's sake, let it go. Resign and slip off into the sun set. Most of us respect you in spite of your bad memory. Please don't make it worse.
8 posted on 12/28/2010 4:54:00 PM PST by ANGGAPO (Layte Gulf Beach Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ANGGAPO
Most of us respect you in spite of your bad memory.

Respect?

9 posted on 12/28/2010 5:07:26 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Respect,,,,,,OK that was a stretch. Sorry.
10 posted on 01/24/2011 11:35:53 AM PST by ANGGAPO (Layte Gulf Beach Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson