Sarah for President? (There is no one more qualified for the White House. But is she electable?)

Pajamas Media ^ | 12/30/2010 | David Solway

[onyx]

She needs a makeover, too. Her look is dated now.

[MHGinTN]

Beautiful never goes out of date ... That woman is beautiful all the way through. Thanks be to God that we have women like this in America.

[RoadTest]

“But is she electable?”

That’s not up to just you and me but to the other millions of voters

[onyx]

Right! Since when is she out of style? LOL.

[Cpl. Dwayne Hicks]

And?

[FreeReign]

"Anybody hiding behind anonymity..."

Yeah, that's what they're doing, Kreskin./s

Yeah that's it. Take me out of context and attempt to ignore my point.

As I pointed out to you, the time is now for potential presidential candidates to demonstrate their qualifications, and it has been that way for the past two years. The Marxists have been destroying our country for the past two years...and people like Palin and DeMint have been fighting the battle over the last year or two.

Yet you think the time has yet to come "for a complete unknown to appear and rise to the top."

Which raises the question, what makes a person qualified to be president, when they have been "a complete unknown", for the last two years, while our country is being destroyed?

Answer the question.

[BufordP]

Straw man.

[eaglesiniowa]

I just don’t care for the cultish behavior of some Freepers with regard to their pet politicians.

So having a preference for someone now becomes "cultish"? Give me a break. Because someone expresses their preference now means they are all going to move into some sort of Koresh retreat or drink the poison kool aid? Quit borrowing from lefty tactics of demeaning or demonizing folks who happen to like a particular candidate. Makes you sound like some kind of elitist.

[BufordP]

You accuse “whomever” of hiding behind anonymity. Your words. You implied you already know why “whomever” hasn’t thrown their hat in the ring. You’re already disparaging “whomever” who hasn’t even decided whether they want the job or not.

Choose your words more carefully or eat them.

[eaglesiniowa]

Right on, you beat me to the punch. Damn.

[BufordP]

Straw man.

[eaglesiniowa]

Elitist = RINO = Not worth considering further.

[BufordP]

Oh, and this is another straw man.

Yet you think the time has yet to come "for a complete unknown to appear and rise to the top."

I did NOT say or imply, "the time has come" or that it WOULD happen. Only that it could happen. I have no idea. But apparently you do, Kreskin.

[BufordP]

Elitist = RINO = Not worth considering further.

Okay...I agree...What is your point?

[Conservativegreatgrandma]

How many votes does the “Republican establishment” have?

[onyx]

And?

If Sarah wins the primary then its a sad day for the party. That isn't a knock against Sarah, its a knock against men. If the party can't find a man to lead it, then it shouldn't be in the game.

I think you should stop digging before you bury yourself. Too much emphasis on men as leaders and Sarah's looks.

[FreeReign]

Choose your words more carefully or eat them.

And these are your words:

"it could very well be a complete unknown appear and rise [sic] to the top when the time comes."

For the third time now, what makes a person qualified to be president, when they have been "a complete unknown", for the last two years, while our country is being destroyed?

Answer the question, or eat your own argument.

[GlockThe Vote]

Are you freaking kidding or what?

[Minus_The_Bear]

Palin has almost a %60 negative approval rating.

There already Primary for Palin Groups of Democrats that are signing up to vote for her in open primaries because Obama will destroy her.

[onyx]

Excellent! Operation Chaos! I pray she wins the GOP nomination!