Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Savage Beast
"The rather toxic implication of this proposal is that one side respects the Constitution and the other doesn't."
That's right, Ez. Ezra is like a parrot. He can say the words, but apparently he doesn't understand what they mean.
That implication certainly is "rather" toxic. But it is the direct implication not of this proposal in isolation but of the explicit words of people on "the other side" when they said that "You have to pass the bill in order to see what is in it" and "We can do anything we want."
Son, that is toxic. In November you got an indication of how toxic that can be to "the other side's" chances of winning election in any jurisdiction where a majority of the electorate actually thinks of themselves as free, responsible adults.

23 posted on 12/31/2010 1:45:25 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion
What about: "Stroke of the pen. Law of the land. Kinda cool!"

The scariest thing of all is that millions of people can't comprehend the danger we are in.

Don't watch the old Kevin McCarthy movie version of The Invasion of the Body Snatchers. It'll scare the wits out of you. And it takes place in California! I'm not convinced that it wasn't a documentary.

24 posted on 12/31/2010 6:55:57 AM PST by Savage Beast ("You can, in fact must, shout 'fire' in a crowded theatre. It just has to be the truth." J. Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson