Just like his big daddy, Barky Obamao.
I tried to put a "Hurlnami Alert" in the title, but ran out of room.
Might as well throw it away. Hussein and the RATS have.
mojito: You got Klein right - Smug, clueless, moron, and just to show you that I like Marine Lee Ermy, an “asswipe”.
Klein writes a column for the Washington Post and it often sounds like he’s in the 8th grade.
If they ever do an Indie movie about his life, it will be entitled “Clueless 2”.
The stupidity of Ezra Klein is astonishing.
BO is NOT constitutionally qualified to be POTUS regardless of where he was born because by his own admission his dad was a British/Kenyan citizen.
There is a clear, concise and definitive statement in Vattel’s Law of Nations which was the principal legal treatise used by the Founding Fathers in writing the Constitution.
“The natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens... it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/05/aka-obama-ineligible-if-he-was-born-on.html
What a midget...
If Klein and all his journolist fellow propagandists disappeared by tommorrow, it would be no loss whatsoever.
Klein has no constitution connection? You Betcha!No one in the Obamam fascist movement does.
Thomas Jefferson's records indicate that they were designated by the Board of Visitors of his University of Virginia to be taught there as the text for its law school. "'The Federalist'", the Board minutes indicate, "constitute 'an authority to which appeal is habitually made by all, and rarely declined or denied by any as evidence of the general opinion of those who framed, and of those who accepted the Constitution of the U. S., on questions as to its genuine meaning.'" (Quoted from Thomas Jefferson's record of the meeting). (P. 225, "Our Ageless Constitution."}
Should Mr. Klein feel that he is up to reading and comprehending these explanations of this Constitution he finds to be so difficult and temporary in its construction, perhaps he might better understand the protections for liberty of that document so admired by generations of intellectual giants who love liberty throughout the world (including Sir William Gladstone).
As I said on another related post:
“If they cant understand the Constitution especially when assisted with the Federalist papers. Then they never could comprehend the tax code or the health care bill to name a few challenges for the libs.”
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.”
Patrick Henry
Now someone should just take away Klein’s “freedom of the press”, and watch him wail...liberals use the Constitution like atheists use the Bible, selectively and only when it benefits them.
Please?
It’s not often you find a lefty that’s so refreshingly honest about his (her) beliefs.
Fine. Constitution is out.
Let’s shut down the Washington Post (among others) and lock up Ezra Klein, just for openers. No writ, no warrant, no due cause, no habeus corpus.
We have guns and fuel, we have land and skills, we have faith, principle, conviction and b@lls-—they got none.
Ezra et al.....let’s get this dance started.
“This clownish juvenile deliquent who passes for informed opinion on the left is pleased to reveal that the Constitution is “over a hundred years old,” and hence, out of date, irrelevant, and downright confusing.”
Yup. Delusional. Worldwide experience in all manner of ‘experiments’ in sovereign governance has shown the US Constitution to be key to the success of the USA, the envy of that portion of the rest of the world that has knowledge of world history. That lesson appears difficult to learn in an intellectual environment that believes it deserves to be supported by the government without any exchange of productivity.
If ezra the nancyboy wants the Constitution to fail, so be it. If anarchy prevails, which he seems to want, little does he know that he and his scrawny body would last no more than a month in a brutal lawless world.
Try reading the Constitution.
Then try reading the Obamacare bill.
Which one appears to be more confusing?
The American Constitution is an expression of the Doctrine of Negative (or Natural) Rights.
The Doctrine of Negative (or Natural) Rights comes from God, and is therefore inherent in all human beings.
To deny the binding power of the Doctrine of Negative (or Natural) Rights, therefore, is to deny the binding power of God's Law.
Game on.
Imagine what he must believe about the traditional beliefs of "indigenous pipples." [/sarcasm]
Bet he'd be the first person to scream "First Amendment!" if some local school principal edited the "f-" word out of a student newspaper.