Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lakin case is end of 'rule of law'
WorldNetDaily ^ | December 29, 2010 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 12/30/2010 6:46:03 PM PST by Rabin

A retired military officer who pursued all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court a legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy of the Oval Office says the conviction and sentencing of an active duty officer who raised similar questions signals the end of the "rule of law" in the United States. Cmdr. Charles Kerchner's legal case, handled by attorney Mario Apuzzo, alleged that Congress failed its constitutional duty to examine the legitimacy of a successful candidate during the Electoral College vetting process on Capitol Hill. The Supreme Court ultimately decided not to hear arguments, leaving standing a lower court's dismissal.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: certifigate; kerchner; lakin
Seems to Rab, there's a bit of hissy fit hand wringing on the part of Bob Unruh here. While it is quite true, that a constitution un- supported is no constitution at all, this is surely not to infer that when challenged, failure is automatic. Quite the opposite is in fact the reality. Only when truly challenged, can we earn our blessings.

R.

1 posted on 12/30/2010 6:46:08 PM PST by Rabin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rabin

White people still operate under the “rule of law.”


2 posted on 12/30/2010 6:48:47 PM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rabin

The Supreme Court only does the right thing.

....Dredd Scott Decision.....er, wait....


3 posted on 12/30/2010 6:48:52 PM PST by OldArmy52 (Obama & the "Dem Party" have proved America is ready for Fascism/Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rabin

Hugo Chavez would be proud of the way things are running in this country. Maybe he’s even envious.


4 posted on 12/30/2010 6:50:41 PM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rabin

The Hot Potato That Nobody Wants To Touch.


5 posted on 12/30/2010 6:52:25 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

He was very impressed with Obama’s takeover of GM/Chrysler, he even called Castro in Cuba to say that Obama was more of a socialist than they were.


6 posted on 12/30/2010 6:55:22 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rabin

Lakin pled guilty to 3 counts of disobeying orders and was convicted by a jury of his peers on a 4th count of missing movement.

How is that the end of the rule of law?


7 posted on 12/30/2010 6:56:18 PM PST by FS11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldArmy52

I love throwing that at people who say that the USSC “does only the right thing” OR, perhaps, “that earlier USSC decisions are more valid because they are closer to when the Constitution was written.” I had that last one thrown at me when I was grousing that the USSC went about illegitimately amending the Constitution as early as 1798 when, in the Calder v. Bull case, they declared that the prohibition against Ex Post Facto law applied only to criminal laws.

What is interesting is that the Congress uses this rationale to pass ex post facto tax laws which they label as “administrative” or “regulatory” laws; but then when the IRS pursues someone for violating one such law it is done so in a CRIMINAL court. So, if a tax law is not criminal so that it can be retroactive, why is it prosecuted criminally? And if a tax law IS criminal, why are the legeslatures allowed to make them in an Ex Post Facto manner?

Of course that is no quandary if one rejects the notion that the Constitution is whatever the USSC says that it is; in that case what the legislatures are doing is wrong, period. And that is why the government cannot bear the thought of being held to an absolute standard of the Constitution: it limits their own powers.


8 posted on 12/30/2010 7:02:16 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FS11
Lakin made a really bad decision ,perhaps based on advice from someone who even posts here.He was doomed from the very first.Remember the story of the private in WW2 who demanded the court martial rather than accepting military discipline and returning to his frontline unit? They SHOT him.

Especially if the powers that be ARE wrong they will punish the person who points out that fact.

The entire corrupt political structure will NOT unseat the fraud ,obama.They all have interests to cover.

Remember how the Ohio legislature and Congrss 40 years later retroactively "corrected" Ohio's non-ratification of the federal income tax? I know the federal income tax wasn't ratified as per the Constitution but there is and was no way in hell that government at any level is ever going to admit it.

Remember Andy Jackson's violations of treaty law in dispossessing the Cherokee ?

Only dedent God-fearing men respect the law as written;the average politician and his handlers just view the law as something to be twisted and evaded.

9 posted on 12/30/2010 7:09:57 PM PST by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FS11

Keep watching TV Obot.

Even many here who love Prince Al Waleed’s Fox News may be shocked because another freeper said their darling Megan Kelly is bashing birthers. Everyone loves the saudi puppet on TV and the media.

Coups, tyranny and takeovers just require sheep and cowards. Lakin is neither.


10 posted on 12/30/2010 7:12:55 PM PST by Frantzie (Slaves do not have freedom only the illusion of freedom & their cable TV to drool at)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FS11

He was denied the ability to present evidence and witnessed on his behalf contrary to the 6th Amendment, for one.
Further, the judge declared that the eligibility of the President has NO impact on the validity of the orders his superiors issued... that in itself flies in the face of established/codified military law.


11 posted on 12/30/2010 7:17:47 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

Lakin capitulated on every thing he claimed he stood for and repeatedly stated that he was wrong to challenge BO’s legitimacy. Had he stood his ground, he would have had a basis for appeal. Since he pled guilty he lost his chance to appeal. Certainly he got bad legal advice, but he has only himself to blame for following the bad advice.


12 posted on 12/30/2010 7:31:35 PM PST by FS11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All

Please realize the TRUTH: Lawlessness was elected on 11/4/08...and didn’t start with this case. There is nothing Congress or anyone else is going to do to remove Obama from office.


13 posted on 12/30/2010 7:32:09 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
The Hot Potato That Nobody Wants To Touch.

Everything about socialism is sham and affectation. - 23.11 Ch23; Evil; Economic Harmonies; Frederic Bastiat 1801-1850

14 posted on 12/30/2010 7:38:12 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FS11
Lakin capitulated on every thing he claimed he stood for and repeatedly stated that he was wrong to challenge BO’s legitimacy. Had he stood his ground, he would have had a basis for appeal. Since he pled guilty he lost his chance to appeal. Certainly he got bad legal advice, but he has only himself to blame for following the bad advice.

You and I agree that by pleading guilty he capitulated; I suspect there was some plea-bargaining going on there but that is ultimately irrelevant.
That he did capitulate does NOT negate that it was a travesty that his 6th Amendment rights were so completely cut-off.

That a 'guilty' plea will likely prevent appeals is very sad and disappointing.

15 posted on 12/30/2010 7:45:16 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

I agree that his 5th and 6th amendment rights were violated. Unfortunately by pleading guilty, he surrender his right to appeal those violations.


16 posted on 12/30/2010 7:52:07 PM PST by FS11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

I agree that his 5th and 6th amendment rights were violated. Unfortunately by pleading guilty, he surrendered his right to appeal those violations.


17 posted on 12/30/2010 7:52:26 PM PST by FS11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FS11

11

“How is that the end of the rule of law?”

The view from under a bus is typically dismal. Having established that no one in the known universe has “standing” to inspect the credos of our dear leader, one can but wonder, from our now perspective. None the less, it seems this valiant soul said take me first. The monolith did so.
Smart career move, not. But this is the stuff that heroes are made of.

But to your lead Q. I completely agree, were the “rule of law” that all so frail. We should all have been toast long before the invention of bread.

R


18 posted on 12/30/2010 7:59:08 PM PST by Rabin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rabin

Yes Hyperbole is the Hallmark of WND.


19 posted on 12/30/2010 8:05:12 PM PST by FS11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Rabin

The Heros are the ones who stand their ground and never surrender.

Nathan Hale (June 6, 1755 – September 22, 1776) was a soldier for the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War. A spy for the Continental Army, he volunteered for an intelligence-gathering mission in New York City but was captured by the British. He is probably best remembered for his purported last words before being hanged: “I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country.”


20 posted on 12/30/2010 8:11:21 PM PST by FS11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

They are afraid of a black uprising if Obama is challenged. A race war. - The sad thing is that Obama is NOT black; he’s pretty white actually, and very privileged.


21 posted on 12/30/2010 8:13:37 PM PST by Twinkie (Awake and strengthen that which remains . . . . . . . . Revelation 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Twinkie

Twink

The good part is that the concept of black? white/yellow/brown American is flatly bullshit. The blood is red, the kids are bueatiful, and they are Americans.

The bad part is that there is in fact multieth junk. These then are going to rise up to support this twerp, 0. Rab thimks probably not.

R.


22 posted on 12/30/2010 9:07:34 PM PST by Rabin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Twinkie

I don’t believe he’ll be challenged...instead he’ll move on. U.N.SecGen term expires in exactly 1 year.


23 posted on 12/30/2010 9:29:08 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FS11
Lakin capitulated on every thing he claimed he stood for and repeatedly stated that he was wrong to challenge BO’s legitimacy.

I smell a rat. Someone told his lawyer, if Lakin says this and says that and does the other, things will go better for him..... and then when the lawyer convinced Lakin to perform, the other side turned around and screwed them both -- they had what they needed and nailed him to a wall.

Only the lawyer knows what happened, and he'll be too ashamed of himself to say anything, he'll look so bad.

"But we had a deeeeeeaallllllllll...... </whine>"

24 posted on 12/31/2010 4:47:23 AM PST by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham

I wish I lived closer to you, I would like to buy you a beverage of your choice. I am one hundred percent in agreement with your post.


25 posted on 12/31/2010 5:24:41 AM PST by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FS11

Lakin may not have chosen the best path but he tried to work within the system and it was not allowed, as far as the trial goes it was rigged against him from the start, he was guilty before he ever sat down. If we could know what went on behind the scenes we would probably understand why he pled guilty.

“Military justice is to justice as military music is to music.” source unknown


26 posted on 12/31/2010 5:29:38 AM PST by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OldArmy52
The Supreme Court only does the right thing.

Kelo v. City of New London

27 posted on 12/31/2010 7:00:43 AM PST by GBA (Not on our watch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson