to 
Posted on 01/01/2011 2:12:48 PM PST by rxsid
"New eligibility challenge reaches Supreme Court
Attorney calls for recusal of Obama judicial appointees
"There is a widespread perception among 'conservative' media figures such as Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin that judicial appointments have been made by the respondent Obama with the expectation of favors in return. This has combined with a campaign of ridicule and 'unthinkability' on these serious issues led by the press spokesman of the respondent Obama among others," said a "motion to recuse" submitted by attorneys working on behalf of Gregory S. Hollister, a retired military officer.
The motion cites Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, both of whom were awarded the lifetime tenure positions on probably the most influential court in the world by Obama.
"What is very much at issue here is the question of public perception. Will this court be bound by the Constitution and the law that it sets out under the Constitution? It is important that this court, above all institutions, preserves and protects the Constitution and a rule of law based upon it," the motion states.
"We would think that this is particularly the case in light of the historically unprecedented attack on this court's determination to uphold the constitutional rule of law engaged in by the respondent Obama during the State of the Union Address that he gave in January of 2010. It is as if he and those working with him and backing him believe that this court and the federal judiciary can be manipulated and intimidated in the manner that investigations have revealed as having occurred in the courts of Cook County, Illinois.
"We would suggest that this court should particularly avoid the appearance of favoritism as overriding the rule of law based upon the Constitution," the motion said. "
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
to
Whatever mess it makes will be a very, very small price to pay for the mess that leaving all that marxist insane s*** in place will cause!
Maybe, maybe not. I’ve read otherwise, since the de facto officer doctrine may or does not apply to fraud, especially fraud that many people knew about at the time.
So it’s not really so much that he will be “found” to be ineligible, as much as he will be “revealed” to be ineligible, and that many, many people knew about it all along and indeed, committed crimes to get him where he is.
That is different than a regular old de facto officer doctrine.
can you make a new thread on this..pls..I will probably screw it up.
STAND UP FOR THE CONSTITUTION
STAND DOWN FROM ALL UNLAWFUL ORDERS
Make this your Number One resolution of the New Year on:
LTC LAKIN DAY – January 1, 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oUM8BbQQhk&feature=player_embedded
Note my reply about this just above.
I want a bumpter sticker that says that.
That is different than a regular old de facto officer doctrine.
And rolling back 0’s acts wouldn’t be any constitutional crisis, it’d just be a .... rollback.
The only reason the Tea Party has been so successful in taking over the House, getting function control of the Senate, and setting the political agenda for the country is because it managed to marginalize and eclipse the Birthers, freaks, and Joseph Farah-type hucksters who make a living off idiotic conspiracy theories.
If the Birthers did not exist, James Carvile and Rahm Emmanuel would invent them, because to the extent that they have any influence, all they manage to do is make the Right look like idiots.
Question to ponder: What’s the media outlet that publicizes the Birthers the most? Answer: MSNBC. It shouldn’t be that difficult to figure out why.
If the Birthers did not exist, James Carvile and Rahm Emmanuel would invent them, because to the extent that they have any influence, all they manage to do is make the Right look like idiots.
Question to ponder: What’s the media outlet that publicizes the Birthers the most? Answer: MSNBC. It shouldn’t be that difficult to figure out why.
What "conspiracy theory" are you calling idiotic?
NOT rolling back everything he signed, all appointments etc - now that WOULD be a constitutional crisis! There is no easy simple way through this. But dragging him out after the nasty truth is made public and then undoing all the crap he did is the only way to fix it. Hope the Rs in Congress and elsewhere have courage and wits and stop giving a crap what the media or Dems think about anything.
I think one day a week should be LTC Lakin Day. I have great respect for that man. Nauseated me on threads where people insulted him.
That’s easy to do from a keyboard.
You are out of your mind. Totally.
...”a law into effect that prevents an ineligible candidate from getting on the ballot?”
Call me naive, but don’t such laws already exist and why does it seem to me that lately we are always needing new laws to enforce the laws we’ve already got?
Maybe they do at the Federal level but not so sure about the states. We have all seen how eager the Feds are to enforce the law now haven't we?
so true!
Whoa!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.