Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New edition of 'Huckleberry Finn' to lose the N-word
CNN ^ | January 5, 2011 | Keith Staskiewicz

Posted on 01/05/2011 7:02:51 AM PST by Huck

Edited on 01/05/2011 7:05:47 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

What is a word worth? According to Publishers Weekly, NewSouth Books' upcoming edition of Mark Twain's seminal novel "Adventures of Huckleberry Finn" will remove all instances of the N-word -- I'll give you a hint, it's not nonesuch -- present in the text and replace it with slave.


(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alangribben; auburnuniversity; censorship; dixie; huckfinn; huckleberryfinn; literature; marktwain; nword; pages; purge; samclemens; samuelclemens; tomsawyer; twain; yesterdayonfr
This makes me physically ill. I really despise humanity these days. I despise our culture. I despise the prevailing mode of thought. I deeply, truly, and completely HATE and REJECT the ways of the world. Sick, sick, sick.
1 posted on 01/05/2011 7:02:56 AM PST by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Sorry, I messed up the title...could you please fix?

Should read: “New edition of ‘Huckleberry Finn’ to lose the N-word”


2 posted on 01/05/2011 7:04:21 AM PST by Huck (Do talk radio hosts get paid extra when they use the word "impugn"? It sure seems like it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Other articles about it

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;q=quick;s=edition


3 posted on 01/05/2011 7:06:09 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Huck

I’ve sent my response:

agribben@aum.edu


4 posted on 01/05/2011 7:12:27 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Nothing like rewriting the clasics. who know’s? One day Ahab may kill and eat Moby Dick.


5 posted on 01/05/2011 7:15:25 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

But what about all the people who find the word ‘slave’ offensive!?
This is slavebaiting, plain and simple! I’m outraged!


6 posted on 01/05/2011 7:16:03 AM PST by ozark hilljilly (Y'all had enough, yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Hating reality seems like such a waste of time and effort.


7 posted on 01/05/2011 7:31:02 AM PST by stuartcr (When politicians politicize issues, aren't they just doing their job?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozark hilljilly

If the N-word is so bad why do blacks keep using it???.The new issue of the race card (slavebaiting) fails to tell how blacks also OWNED slaves,guesss they will get back to on that issue?.


8 posted on 01/05/2011 7:40:35 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Huck

More than a little silly.

But, in partial defense of the bowdlerizers, the word in question has changed considerably in meaning since Twain used it.


9 posted on 01/05/2011 7:41:31 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

NewSouth Books is a ninth-rate small publisher based in Alabama. OBVIOUSLY they are both looking for some publicity
AND trying to cash in on what they see as the ‘trend’ of increasing numbers of schools’ being amenable to the idea of altering these classics so as to be in the vanguard of PC. The mere act of issuing an edition without the N word or the word Injun presupposes there will be enough schools and students who these books can be disseminated to to make it worth their while to put out this PC alteration.
It’s a stupid gamble, since they’re “answering a need”, as they see it, but also trying to FOSTER a continuing need, by letting it be known that THEIR editions are there for any school that wants to buy them.And on top of all that, they need to MAKE MONEY ON IT.
Hard to imagine they’ll make anything on this enterprise, but I wouldn’t be surprised to find the long arm of the Obama Administration or its surrogates somewhere in this, helping out with some secret or indirect funding.
NO REPUTABLE PUBLISHER would ever do this to an American Classic like Huck Finn.
THIS is a publisher whose audience is PC School Boards, Administrations, and the ‘vulnerable’ young students they tell you they are trying to ‘protect’ from ‘troublesome’, ‘out-of-date’ words, which they think are explosive now, 125 years later, but weren’t then.


10 posted on 01/05/2011 7:46:17 AM PST by supremedoctrine (Come closer. I want to get a better look at you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

It will not be Huck Finn... it will be something else.

LLS


11 posted on 01/05/2011 7:51:35 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

This is silly. However, the book will be a 1/3 shorter ;)


12 posted on 01/05/2011 7:52:04 AM PST by DCBryan1 (FORGET the lawyers...first kill the "journalists". (Die Ritter der Kokosnuss))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

See my reply # 10 following yours.Of course,
The word has changed in meaning since it was first used in Huckleberry Finn, but that’s not what’s on the agenda of the Publishers or the people they’re intending to serve.
Chances are very high that changing the N-word to ‘slave’ will NOT go unnoticed by any kid reading this word, thereby backfiring, and HEIGHTENING the fact that the N-word was used all those years ago. So they tend to wind up in the same place intellectually as if they’d just been given the original version to read. THIS time, though, they’ve had a little detour on the road to Political Correctness they didn’t need, and probably would laugh at once it becomes clear to them.


13 posted on 01/05/2011 7:53:53 AM PST by supremedoctrine (Come closer. I want to get a better look at you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Wonder what Samuel Langhorne Clemens would have to say about this.


14 posted on 01/05/2011 8:13:13 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

“Never let your schoolin’ interfere with your education”.


15 posted on 01/05/2011 8:15:39 AM PST by kcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

This is garbage.

The juxtaposition of the character’s derogatory name, “Nigger Jim”, with his absolutely saintly character, gives the book punch. Twain was a masterful writer; these morons want to emasculate him.


16 posted on 01/05/2011 8:16:31 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: supremedoctrine
This makes me physically ill.

NewSouth Books is a ninth-rate small publisher based in Alabama. OBVIOUSLY they are both looking for some publicity AND trying to cash in on what they see as the ‘trend’ ... And on top of all that, they need to MAKE MONEY ON IT.

Oh no, capitalism. It's not like this is the first classic to be expurgated for use in schools. I thought FR was in favor of letting people make a buck.

17 posted on 01/05/2011 8:16:49 AM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Wonder what Samuel Langhorne Clemens would have to say about this.

He'd probably show up on the publisher's doorstep- with a shotgun!

18 posted on 01/05/2011 8:20:27 AM PST by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty too! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

That’s only if it’s something a freeper likes.


19 posted on 01/05/2011 8:24:48 AM PST by stuartcr (When politicians politicize issues, aren't they just doing their job?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Huck
In that case I suppose that we should go ofter Ernest Gaines for using that same word in “The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pitman.”
20 posted on 01/05/2011 8:29:21 AM PST by Brucifer (Proud member of the Double Secret Reloading Underground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Thank you for that address. Political correctness in literature is censorship.


21 posted on 01/05/2011 8:38:09 AM PST by kcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kcat
The thing is —that history is messy —history is full of things we regret and I'm sure the folks that want to rewrite history (Mark Twain's epic novel) like most of us, regret the way black people were treated in our country. But that being said, we can't rewrite history; it just “is”.

And again, that being said, are folks going to go after the rappers and rap music that is prevalent with the “N” word??
Doubt it....

22 posted on 01/05/2011 8:42:28 AM PST by duckbutt (Those who pay no taxes have no check on their appetite for services.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kcat
"Political correctness in literature is censorship."

Well, the action was DONE in the name of "political correctness", but I would put action itself in exactly the same moral category as the Nazi book-burning episodes...only worse. At least the Nazis were above-board about it rather than destroying books by "stealth".

There is NO excuse for this kind of thing....NONE. This "author" should be driven from his university position and never be allowed to teach again. He has proven himself morally unfit to teach.

23 posted on 01/05/2011 8:58:26 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Huck

See #17.


24 posted on 01/05/2011 9:00:26 AM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
"But, in partial defense of the bowdlerizers, the word in question has changed considerably in meaning since Twain used it."

The meaning of the word has changed not a bit. At the time it was a colloquialiasm for a person with black skin. It still means exactly that.

25 posted on 01/05/2011 9:00:51 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Huck
I am so sick of all of this PC revisionist cr@p. I'm glad I have a copy of Huckleberry Finn. I hope most of us do.

Is Gone With the Wind next?

26 posted on 01/05/2011 9:04:46 AM PST by Allegra (You're a towel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Is Gone With the Wind next?<<<<<<<<<<

Indeed, perhaps Prissy’s famous line could be changed to: “I’m not familiar with obstetrical procedures”, less demeaning to black women than the original version.


27 posted on 01/05/2011 9:12:10 AM PST by Mjaye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

When Twain wrote HF the word did not have the “ultimate insult” connotation it does today. It was at most mildly denigrating rather than something used to more or less justify any reaction up to and including murder. You can’t tell me the meaning and connotations of the word haven’t changed.

If they haven’t, why are you yourself so carefully avoiding typing it?


28 posted on 01/05/2011 9:13:26 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
I got this from Russel Barker
"The people whom Huck and Jim encounter on the Mississippi are drunkards, murderers, bullies, swindlers, lynchers, thieves, liars, mows, frauds, child abusers, numbskulls, hypocrites, windbags and traders in human flesh. All are white. The one man of honor in this phantasmagoria is 'Nigger Jim,' as Twain called him to emphasize the irony of a society in which the only true gentleman was held beneath contempt."

29 posted on 01/05/2011 9:15:10 AM PST by Cronos (Kto jestem? Nie wiem! Ale moj Bog wie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

You are absolutely right.

Huck Finn is one of the most powerful anti-racism statements ever written.

I found the end, where Huck decides to help Jim escape and just accepts this means he will go to hell, profoundly moving.

Particularly when you remember the author was raised to believe exactly the same thing and had obviously rejected it.

Those who cannot see this and instead fixate on the use of particular words are idiots.


30 posted on 01/05/2011 9:17:25 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Hating reality seems like such a waste of time and effort.

I do understand and appreciate your point.

31 posted on 01/05/2011 9:57:09 AM PST by Huck (Do talk radio hosts get paid extra when they use the word "impugn"? It sure seems like it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

I agree. In a similar note, I remember when the word ‘sucks’, had really bad connatations. Now, it’s everywhere.


32 posted on 01/05/2011 10:05:22 AM PST by stuartcr (When politicians politicize issues, aren't they just doing their job?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Do you think that since he really believed it, he went to hell?


33 posted on 01/05/2011 10:07:00 AM PST by stuartcr (When politicians politicize issues, aren't they just doing their job?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
"You can’t tell me the meaning and connotations of the word haven’t changed."

I said zip about "connotations". I said "meaning". Which has not changed at all. Yeah, there has been an onus put on it, but that changes not one thing about Twain's book.

The only people who get upset about Twain are the same ones who object to "niggardly". IOW, idiots.

"If they haven’t, why are you yourself so carefully avoiding typing it?"

What make you think I've "carefully avoided it". I've got no problem with typing "nigger". It's a perfectly valid English word.

34 posted on 01/05/2011 12:11:58 PM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Next, Tom Sawyer will no longer be whitewashing the fence, he will be applying a latex base coat with subtle undertones.


35 posted on 01/09/2011 10:53:48 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson