Skip to comments.Mother and daughter accused of molesting teen boy for three years, police say
Posted on 01/05/2011 9:45:39 AM PST by Maelstorm
A mother and daughter in Arizona are accused of sexually abusing a teenage boy for three years and police say the pair did it without knowing about each others relationship with him.
The mother, 48-year-old Susan Brock, allegedly met the boy for trysts when he was 13 and continued for three years until this past October, police said. Her daughter, Rachel, now 21, allegedly sent him nude photos and videos of herself between 2007 and 2008, police said.
The alleged victim, now 17, told cops Susan Brock would pick him up after school in her car and take him to secluded areas where she molested the boy, police said.
The boy claims Rachel Brock abused him at her familys home. Police said the Brocks did not have intercourse with the boy.
Rachel Brock was arrested Wednesday on three counts of sexual misconduct with a minor. Her mother was arrested in October.
Chandler Police Sgt. Joe Favazzo said the Brocks committed the crimes without each others knowledge.
"You have a situation where you have a mother who's abusing a juvenile victim, seemingly unknowingly to the daughter, or vice versa, and the daughter is also abusing the same victim," Favazzo told The Associated Press. "I just can't imagine a mother and daughter having this conversation, and the investigators say they don't have anything indicating the two of them knew about it."
Susan Brocks husband of 28 years is Maricopa County Supervisor Fulton Brock, who announced he was splitting with his wife after her arrest.
"I have filed to divorce my wife. I cannot divorce my daughter," Fulton Brock said. "She is my blood. I will always be her dad. And she needs me now more than ever."
(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...
The differences in their respective situations is made pretty plain by those photos.
Mom looks like a little stouter version of the mom on ‘Weeds’...
What an unfortunate boy.
Gee, I wonder why the kid kept getting in the car with her?
ant tata shots?
Mrs Robinson gone bad.
The daughter is only 3 or 4 years older than the boy. That’s not exactly a molestation. When the relationship started, neither were at the age of consent.
The mother should go to prison for a good long time, though.
The results of sexual depravity....the promotion of sex in the schools and media devoid of morality. The promotion of homosexuality which defies logic and biology, and destroys the concept that there is any sexual moral constraints—none. The slippery slope will lead to adult/child sex. Pederasty is always part of homosexuality, since they have to initiate and train the young to make it acceptable and embraced by adults.
The Pope is correct when he calls it the “Culture of Death”. Disgusting societies of nihilism. They will implode just as the cultural Marxists have designed forcing moral relativism in America to replace the Bible.
Mary Louise Parker, always had the hots for her.
Some sweeping generalizations there, don’t you think?
Wait a minute, I know the picture of the mother has been on here before. Same case?
I don’t know the details. Either way what was done was wrong especially the Mom. The girl was 18 or 19 depending on her birthday still she had no business messing with a 13 year old. If I found out an 18-19 year was messing with my 13 year old daughter I’d be more than a little upset. People who focus on young people do so because they can be controlled and manipulated. They have problems with relationships with real adults so they go after the inexperienced. I had a ‘relationship’ with a 21 year old married woman when I was in HS and even though I didn’t see it as a problem. I couldn’t have imagined something like that when I was 13.
Thanks for your well written analysis of this situation.
I believe sexual liberalism which carries with it a denial of free will and self control combined with a culture of the moment has made this kind of the kind more common and even accepted around the edges. The one group which can be said to be inexperienced enough to not have the ability to make decisions on sex are the ones that are then put on trial in the public space. Why did they keep getting in the car or returning to be victimized? If it had been an addictive drug or alcohol that the kids was being given that wouldn’t be an issue but because it is sex and many adults think it is ok to deceive to acquire sex provided another can be tricked or manipulated to agree to it then it is hard for them not to defend those that victimize.
I’m not a prude but I also see society being nudged in a direction that not only threatens children but also threatens are liberties by elevating sexual behavior to a status on par with ethnicity or race. That I believe is extraordinarily dangerous and has the potential to create circumstances where the victims or their loved ones trying to defend them become the criminals in the eyes of the law.
For whatever reason, I think it’s different when it’s an 18-19yo girl and a 13yo boy. I doubt the kid really suffered, or he would have avoided contact with them. The article didn’t mention anything about force, coercion or threats of any kind.
Wonder why it took 3 years to report the abuse.
Yeah! Right! LOL
You can bet your booty he didn’t keep this to himself.
That is a good question. Who knows. Usually these things come to a head when the individual wishes to form his or her own relationship outside of the inappropriate one. It also may have arisen from counseling sessions where some other behavior or emotional/mental issue was connected. Regardless he was 13 and it was wrong on both counts. There is no justification for sexually predatory behavior of an adult with a 13 year old. Even if he was gung-ho about it a child can not make those decisions and it is a responsibility of the the adults in question to protect the under-aged child.
They must have been better looking 4 years ago.
An answer to my nightly prayers.
Yes, cultural Marxists present sexual liberation as being free from any morality. They want no God, we are just animals and utopia is sexual freedom even for the young child.
Rampant sexual immorality will destroy the natural family and all relationships in the end. Children engaging in sexual acts destroys their relationship to parents and makes them incapable of productive learning—they become slaves to the passions and pleasures of the body. That is why homosexuals molest the young at such high rates....they were initiated into sexual perversion at a young age and are fixated on that age for maximum excitement. They are devoid of any morality concerning sex.
Their need for “marriage” etc., is just to validate their immorality—force societal approval on acts that are evil and destructive to the body—and they “feel” it will end their self-loathing. It won’t. It will just drag all of society into the sewer.
Yes, same case, from October when she was arrested.
The homonazis try to tell these kids that they are probably homo if they don't get laid by age 16 or so. The truth is that most of these boys discover they are perfectly normal heterosexual just a few years later if they are (a)left alone or (b)manage to ignore the perverted creeps pushing this junk.
This is the precise reason why the homonazis (and, to a lesser extent, the perverts on the heterosexual side) target these kids at their most vulnerable age.
Geez, what a mess.
Just about the time when I think I’ve seen every bizarre remark that has ever been made, I read yet something else from al baby.
Is your sister single? Hmmmm...?
That is what is unfortunate. The number of those who abuse who report having been abused themselves is much higher than the general population. It is the cycle of abuse that so many crime shows often focus on. When a young child is exposed to a sex abuse behavior whether it be homosexual or otherwise in which he is imprinted through the release of vasopressin and oxytocin. This is a very powerful thing which is why early sexual experience can have such a profound affect on the abused. Some studies have show such early sexual exposure can result in hyper-masculinity or hyper femininity in the abused as well as increased risky sexual behavior, drug use, etc.
baby sitter baby sitter
Ant tatas? Dude, you're sick!
(But I'll see if I can find some grasshopper tatas).
You still haven’t learned some things are better left unsaid.
How many cops did it take to SLAP the smile off that boys face?..
I dunno, I think her broad brush pretty much nailed it.
It would lead to extensive bragging.
But, I'm not 13 anymore and know better. That's why adults run the world.
They (the two women) weren’t showing the same level of attention he was use to receiving??
Is there any suggestion that they use force? Sounds like the kid didn’t consider it “abuse” (until later).
I expect it took him 3 years to decide he didn't like it anymore.
It isn’t abuse if you go willingly. Something tells me the kid liked it, at least enough to keep quiet about it for 3 years.
You are correct.
It is the forced sexualization of the children—indoctrination through “sex education”—a forcing of children to think about sex when it is not important to them because of their maturation.
This homosexualization is to pervert the young children to believe they are abnormal (homosexuals) because they most enjoy being with members of their own sex. This is natural development of a healthy sexual identification. All psychology explains this “natural” sexual identity formation of children identifying with members of their own sex.
The imposition of “forced learning” about homosexuality (something young children could NEVER imagine unless molested or perverted by images from adults or sexually abused children) is intentional.
It is to create a pagan paradigm in place of the Judeo-Christian worldview—where good and evil are redefined. This will justify evil and create a society that goes against Natural Law Theory and according to Cicero—no just society can survive if they are not aligned with natural law. Chaos and unhappiness is always the result of daring to go against God’s laws and the laws of nature. This is proven throughout history.
Not arguing your premise, but this was heterosexual contact that is alleged.
I expect it took him 3 years to decide he didn't like it anymore.
The article says that they did not have intercourse with him. I'd guess that he decided he wanted to screw along with whatever they were doing and they said "no".
You have to be very careful what boxes you open as they will always come back to bite you later.