Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Arizona Shootings, Gun Violence Research and the Facts vs. The New York Times
Fox News ^ | January 14, 2011 | John R. Lott Jr.

Posted on 01/14/2011 5:17:22 PM PST by JohnRLott

You know you’re doing something right when two New York Times columnists, Gail Collins and Nicholas Kristof, attack your research on the same day. Kristof followed up on criticism leveled earlier in the week by others writing for The Times. I must have said something substantial enough to warrant this attention. Let us check the facts.

Gail Collins worries that law-abiding citizens carrying concealed handguns can't be trusted: . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; concealedcarry; foxnews; giffords; guncontrol; handguns; johnlott; mediabias; newyorktimes

1 posted on 01/14/2011 5:17:25 PM PST by JohnRLott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott

“Gail Collins worries that law-abiding citizens carrying concealed handguns can’t be trusted...”

Of course not. Most of them have not been raised in a NE city with a bunch of jackwagons in a namby pamby college.


2 posted on 01/14/2011 5:25:34 PM PST by jessduntno ("'How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think." - Adolph Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott

Thanks for the post, John. Good work.


3 posted on 01/14/2011 5:29:57 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott

“law-abiding citizens carrying concealed handguns can’t be trusted”

Does that mean criminals carrrying concealed CAN be trusted?/s


4 posted on 01/14/2011 5:48:56 PM PST by dynachrome ("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott

Mr. Lott I salute you Sir! As always a careful analysis of current events and an enlightening discussion of what, on one hand, the media says as opposed to your presentation of the facts.


5 posted on 01/14/2011 5:50:06 PM PST by Inyo-Mono (Had God not driven man from the Garden of Eden the Sierra Club surely would have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch


6 posted on 01/14/2011 5:51:53 PM PST by devolve (. . . . . . Wagya Butt for only $100 pound . . . now nude and improved . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott

It would be interesting to conduct a scientific study on the sort of urban bubble that Nicolas Kristof & his ilk inhabit where guns are NEVER needed.


7 posted on 01/14/2011 6:15:57 PM PST by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott

i would like to see a conceal/carry law in every state of the union. The thought of hand-guns seems to scare the bejesus out of the loud-mouth leftists. This is a good thing. Perhaps their unfounded fear will, however, be enough to teach them the social skills and manners that their parents never did.


8 posted on 01/14/2011 6:18:20 PM PST by AlphaOneAlpha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott

Regarding Obama, guns, and all standard-capacity magazines:

He’s coming to take them away, Ha-ha!
He’s coming to take them away!

THAT is what Obama meant by the wildly-cheered code words in his Tucson speech: “We should be willing to challenge old assumptions in order to lessen the prospects of violence in the future.” aka Gun BANS!


9 posted on 01/14/2011 6:37:48 PM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott
It is flattering to have the New York Times spend so much space discussing my work this week (and even CNN got into the discussion), but it would be even better if The Times could accurately report on the debate.

It would surprise me to see the New York Times accurately report on John Lott's excellent work. On certain subjects, the Times is hardwired to lie.

I wonder if there is a practical way to reduce the number of firearms permits issued to paranoid schizophrenics who do not have a criminal record.

10 posted on 01/14/2011 6:42:05 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott
I believe there are also statistics showing that CCL holders are about the most law-abiding group of people you can find.

These people who are soooo worried about all the guns and folks carrying concealed are welcome to stay out of concealed-carry states. At least, they are welcome to stay out of Texas, and I doubt other gun-friendly places want them either!

11 posted on 01/14/2011 6:54:55 PM PST by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott
It is flattering to have the New York Times spend so much space discussing my work this week (and even CNN got into the discussion), but it would be even better if The Times could accurately report on the debate.

LOL - great line!

12 posted on 01/14/2011 7:23:35 PM PST by GOPJ (."Blood libel" - - when MSM/Dems incite hatred and violence against conservatives based on lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott

Never heard of “Gail Collins”. Any relation to a “Gin Collins”?

Heard of Kristof, known around here as “perpetually pissed-off”.

Who cares what they write?


13 posted on 01/14/2011 7:26:23 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott

Keeping a list of objects, people and groups the government and the media have told us caused this mass murder. Just had to add a couple more.

1. White People.

2. Afghanistan veterans.

3. The GOP.

4. Conservatives.

5. The Tea Party.

6. Gun owners.

7. The NRA.

8. Independent voters.

9. People that display American flags.

10. Rush Limbaugh & talk radio.

11. White people who are insane, but faking insanity.

12. Maps/bulls eyes/cross hairs.

13. Common accidents.

14. Sarah Palin.

15. Tragic accidents.

16. Ronald Reagan.

17. Law abiding citizens carrying concealed handguns.


14 posted on 01/14/2011 8:08:23 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

As most elite liberal idiots live in large blue cities such as NYC and DC, so far as they are concerned most of the “citizens” they see sure as hell aren’t law abiding. That is their frame of reference, it is racist and proves they don’t trust their base of support.


15 posted on 01/14/2011 8:45:59 PM PST by Newtoidaho (Liberals are drooling buffoons backed by satanic goons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott

PING


16 posted on 01/14/2011 11:56:47 PM PST by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott
Gail Collins worries that law-abiding citizens carrying concealed handguns can't be trusted: . . .

No, not exactly.
Gail Collins is worried that LIBERALS carrying concealed handguns can't be trusted.

Its a known 'fact'(1) that Liberals have no self control, So when firearms are in the equation they project what they and their Lib buddies would do if a gun was handy when they got mad.

It's ironic but back in the day when 'Big Cities' were actually big - Detroit, Cincy, Philly, Chicago, etc(2) - there were more guns around than today. Almost every house had a shotgun and every 'kid' a rifle (yes, even in Chicago). And you could freely handle them at the local Sears and Montgomery Wards, or at a Hardware Store out in 'the sticks'. Heck when I was about 14 I could go to the local Sporting Goods Store and buy .22LR ammo - it cost about $.25 for a box of 50. No questions asked.

And the odd thing is we didn't go around shooting each other (How can that be NYT?). We settled 'it' with our fists, nobody went home to grab a gun. And after the fight was over, 'it' was settled.

(1) Look it up NYT
(2) NYC excluded due to the purely political 'Sullivan Act'.

17 posted on 01/15/2011 4:47:16 AM PST by Condor51 (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; ...

Thanks JohnRLott.


18 posted on 01/15/2011 6:05:57 AM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson