Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HUMAN EVENTS: "Why Martin Luther King Was a Republican"
Human Events ^ | 1-17-11 | Frances Rice

Posted on 01/17/2011 10:21:08 AM PST by joinedafterattack

It should come as no surprise that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. In that era, almost all black Americans were Republicans. Why? From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today, the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks. And as one pundit so succinctly stated, the Democrat Party is as it always has been, the party of the four S's: slavery, secession, segregation and now socialism.

It was the Democrats who fought to keep blacks in slavery and passed the discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws. The Democrats started the Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks. The Democrats fought to prevent the passage of every civil rights law beginning with the civil rights laws of the 1860s, and continuing with the civil rights laws of the 1950s and 1960s. [snip]

(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: martinlutherking

1 posted on 01/17/2011 10:21:09 AM PST by joinedafterattack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

Oh brother!


2 posted on 01/17/2011 10:22:48 AM PST by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

Great observations, but none of it can stand against the fact that the Democrats are the ones who give out the goodies. In the final analysis, American blacks aren’t interested in freedom, but in stuff.


3 posted on 01/17/2011 10:25:25 AM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

Bookmark


4 posted on 01/17/2011 10:25:51 AM PST by corlorde (New Hampshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

Jackie Robinson use to go to Republican conventions.

Charlton Heston marched with MLK.

First forced school integration was from Eisenhower.

Al Gore Senior and Robert Byrd voted against the 1964 Civil Rights legislation. Which was prety much passed by more republicans than democrats. It was that Johnson signed it that everyone thinks that it was mostly democrats.


5 posted on 01/17/2011 10:27:41 AM PST by cruise_missile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

The Democrats were ripe for extortion. Jessie Jackson took excellent advantage of that reality. No one did it better. You give us what we want and we’ll never level a racism charge against your party.

Republicans were blind-sided and only in the last few months have begun pushing back against the “racism” canard.


6 posted on 01/17/2011 10:29:23 AM PST by Leonard210 (Tagline? We don't need no stinkin' tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

I am absolutely convinced that, given the demographics of the parties in the South in the 50s, King was a Republican. But it doesn’t mean much—his brand of “Republicanism”, if he remained one into the 60s, was radically anti-war and bordering on Communist.


7 posted on 01/17/2011 10:33:22 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

When does MLK’s FBI file get released??


8 posted on 01/17/2011 10:34:17 AM PST by kenmcg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

could have been several reasons...

http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2010/05/18/republican-party-red-from-the-start-by-alan-stang-2/


9 posted on 01/17/2011 10:35:49 AM PST by gunnyg (WE ARE BEHIND "ENEMY WITHIN" LINES, SURROUNDED, November? Ha! ...So Few Can "grok" It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

Yeah he was such a Republican that you see all his followers in the GOP now.

Good grief.


10 posted on 01/17/2011 10:37:01 AM PST by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunnyg

...several...

http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2010/06/23/%E2%80%9Ci-agree-with-clyde-wilson-that-america-can%E2%80%99t-be-saved-or-returned-to-its-roots-until-the-republican-party-is-destroyed-%E2%80%9D/


11 posted on 01/17/2011 10:37:25 AM PST by gunnyg (WE ARE BEHIND "ENEMY WITHIN" LINES, SURROUNDED, November? Ha! ...So Few Can "grok" It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

If Americans in office and out of office would make your point, MLK Day would disappear from the calendar because democrats would be exposed in their successful effort to abort, jail, control and separate black Americans by near perfect use of the public school, university and academia in marxism, which will not work in this country for another generation or two. The dumbing down of all things traditional and religious has been under full assault.


12 posted on 01/17/2011 10:37:57 AM PST by RitaOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

Just perhaps because Bull Connor was a Democrap?


13 posted on 01/17/2011 10:43:49 AM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cruise_missile

The Civil Rights issues were regional issues and not necessarily party issues as almost all the Democrats in the South Voted against the Voting Rights Act and each of the Southern Republicans voted against the Voting Rights Acts.


14 posted on 01/17/2011 10:49:32 AM PST by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack
The Democrats started the Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks.

Slight correction here. The KKK initially focused more on terrorizing white Republicans in the South up to and including the murder of a sitting Congressman. Only after one-party rule returned did they channel all their efforts on terrorizing blacks.

15 posted on 01/17/2011 10:53:42 AM PST by Ditto (Nov 2, 2010 -- Partial cleaning accomplished. More trash to remove in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack
ONe of the "great" tenets of Communism is the act of REVISING History. The Dimbulbs will say that it was George Bush who crucified Christ, Kidnapped Helen and destroyed Troy, Assasinated MLK and destroyed the Twin Towers on 911! Then the there are the hurricanes and other stuff!

Another Communist tenet is to CONTROL THE MEDIA! in order to control the people's minds!

Nuf said! Except PHOOEY!

16 posted on 01/17/2011 10:56:37 AM PST by Young Werther ("Quae cum ita sunt" Since these things are so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

The Civil Rights issues were regional issues and not necessarily party issues as almost all the Democrats in the South voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and each of the Southern Republicans voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964.


17 posted on 01/17/2011 10:56:55 AM PST by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

Which is the Real ‘Racist’ Party: Fifteen Questions for Democrats
http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/02/08/which-is-the-real-racist-party-fifteen-questions-for-democrats/
Great Moments in Democrat Racist History - FDR
http://theblacksphere.blogspot.com/2009/04/great-moments-in-democrat-racist.html


18 posted on 01/17/2011 10:57:16 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack
MLK was a Socialist. He might have been a Republican before 1960, but he was a RINO if true. He was against Goldwater and as he advanced in years he also advanced in Socialism.

King's legacy is a mixed one. He was great in the early stages of the Civil Rights movement. After the Civil Rights bill was passed, he embraced LBJ's Great Society and massive government dependence which caused the destruction of the black family. He died while supporting a leftist labor union in Memphis.

19 posted on 01/17/2011 10:57:38 AM PST by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

MLK Sr. was a lifelong Republican.

Alveda King claims that “Mrs. Coretta Scott King knew that her husband, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., was pro-life”, regarding Martin Luther King Jr. winning the Margaret Sanger Award from Planned Parenthood in 1966. In 1994, Alveda King wrote a letter condemning Coretta Scott King’s support for abortion and gay marriage.

According to Fox News, Alveda King has “long argued” that Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican.

However, Martin Luther King III said, “It is disingenuous to imply that my father was a Republican. He never endorsed any presidential candidate, and there is certainly no evidence that he ever even voted for a Republican.


20 posted on 01/17/2011 11:18:24 AM PST by Kent C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
I remember MLK saying that civil rights would come along faster in the south than in the north. He said because people in the south have long frendships with blacks.

I've know people from Massachusetts that were as racist as any southerner.

Actually back then. The southern dems outnumbered southern republicans. As I wrote Al Gore Sr. and Robert Byrd.

Byrd of course was a high level KKK guy. That used the “N” word up until a few years ago.

Condoleezza Rice has written how only a republican would register her father to vote in Alabama. Which she said helped make her father a life long republican. I agree. Almost all politics is regional.

21 posted on 01/17/2011 11:22:27 AM PST by cruise_missile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

King was a communist and in todays world he would be a Democrat.


22 posted on 01/17/2011 2:49:46 PM PST by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MBB1984

MLK claimed to be working for liberty. and notwithstanding the egregious racial bigotry of his time, he should have completely rejected the murderous tyranny of Marxism and communism as an unacceptable palliative in ANY context.

I wish to make it clear that I think that Martin Luther King was a man of enormous courage, charisma, and intellect that profoundly altered the course of American history and made it a better country in so far has its promise of justice for all is concerned.

This does not mean that his legacy to the Civil Rights movement has been one of unalloyed good. I believe much of his bequeathment resulted in an over reliance on big government statist solutions to problems within the black community that require individual initiatives to correct. Martin Luther King’s frequent references to this nation’s founding documents are well known. His reflections on Communism are much less well known and undoubtedly contributed to his general philosophy. We owe it to ourselves to examine the effects of this legacy and contextualize it so has to solve the problems facing the black community today.

While King himself was not a communist, he did business with communists and was influenced by them. This delicate subject, made more so given the martyrdom and subsequent lionization of King, should nevertheless be broached as a means of providing insight into some of the darker forces that worked their way into what was essentially a pro American, conservative, Christian civil rights movement.
King surrounded himself with communists from the beginning of his career. His closest advisor Stanley Levison was a Communist. The Southern Christian Leadership Conference, formed in 1957 and led by King, had Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth as Vice President who was at the same time president of the Southern Conference Education Fund, an identified communist front according to the Legislative Committee on un-American Activities, Louisiana (Report April 13, 1964 pp. 31-38). The field director of SCEF was Carl Braden, a known communist agitator who was also involved in the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, which counted Lee Harvey Oswald, the communist assassin of President Kennedy as a member. King maintained regular correspondence with Carl Braden. Bayard Rustin, a known communist, was also on the board of SCLC.
Dr. King addressed the Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tenn., 1957, previously known as the Commonwealth College until the House Committee on un-American Activities sited it as a communist front (April 27, 1949). HCAA found that Commonwealth was using religion as a way to infiltrate the African-American community by, among other techniques, comparing New Testament texts to those of Karl Marx. King knew many communists associated with the Highlander school.
King hired communist official Hunter Pitts O’Dell, 1960, at the SCLC. The St. Louis Globe Democrat reported (Oct. 26, 1962) “A Communist has infiltrated the top administrative post in the Rev. Martin Luther King’s SCLC. He is Jack H. O’Dell, acting executive director of conference activities in the southeastern states including Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana.” Dr. King fired O’Dell when this became public but subsequently rehired him to head the SCLC New York office.

King himself expresses a Marxist outlook in his book “Stride Toward Freedom” when he stated, “in spite of the shortcomings of his analysis, Marx had raised some basic questions. I was deeply concerned from my early teen days about the gulf between superfluous wealth and abject poverty, and my reading of Marx made me even more conscious of this gulf. Although modern American capitalism has greatly reduced the gap through social reforms, there was still need for a better distribution of wealth. Moreover, Marx had revealed the danger of the profit motive as the sole basis of an economic system”

King, unfortunately, didn’t understand that it was Capitalism and freedom that was responsible for the successes the African-American community already had achieved in his day and the key to future success. By “better distribution of wealth” King meant state control over the economy. His contempt for “the profit motive” was unfortunate given that African-Americans should’ve been encouraged by their leaders to seek fair profit to the best of their ability. King’s leftist ideas contributed to an opening of the floodgates to such radicals as Stokley Carmichael, H. Rap Brown, the Black Panthers, as well as the burning and looting of African-American neighborhoods, the institutionalizing of poverty perpetrating welfare, the destruction of the family, drugs, violence, racism, and crime.

In “Stride Toward Freedom” Dr. King states “In short, I read Marx as I read all of the influential historical thinkers from a dialectical point of view, combining a partial yea and a partial no. My readings of Marx convinced me that truth is found neither in Marxism nor in traditional capitalism. Each represents a partial truth. Historically capitalism failed to see truth in collective enterprise and Marxism failed to see the truth in individual enterprise. The Kingdom of God is neither the thesis of individual enterprise nor the antithesis of collective enterprise, but a synthesis which reconciles the truths of both.”

King, like Marx, Lenin, and Stalin, had “a dialectical point of view.” The goal of the dialectic is authoritarianism. A nation, to paraphrase Abraham Lincoln, cannot be half free and half slave. By advocating socialism, King chose an imperious stand toward his own people in contrast to a stand for genuine freedom, self-rule, self-sufficiency, private ownership, and the accumulation of capital. King did not advocate the American system of free market capitalism. Instead, he stood for a system that has stunted the growth of African-Americans as well as the rest of us.

All Marxists believe in Hegelian Dialectics. This is a belief that “progress” is achieved through conflict between opposing viewpoints. Any ideological assertion (thesis) will create its own opposite (antithesis). Progress is achieved when a conclusion (synthesis) is reached which espouses aspects of both the thesis and antithesis.
For example, Hitler had a dialectical point of view. He rejected Marxist class warfare, but embraced the basic socialist idea of the insignificance of the individual compared to the collective state.

This belief in dialectical progress is why liberals pit the rich against the poor, old against young, black against white, men against women, gay against straight, ad nauseam.
This issue is somewhat clouded by what Dr. King wrote in his 1957 book “Stride toward Freedom: the Montgomery story”, in which he wrote the following devastating critique of the sort of communism practiced in the Communist super state of the Union of Soviet Socialist republics.
“During the Christmas holidays of 1949 I decided to spend my spare time reading Karl Marx to try to understand the appeal of communism for many people. For the first time I carefully scrutinized *Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto. I also read some interpretive works on the thinking of Marx and Lenin. In reading such Communist writings I drew certain conclusions that have remained with me as convictions to this day.
First, I rejected their materialistic interpretation of history. Communism, avowedly secularist and materialistic, has no place for God. This I could never accept, for as a Christian, I believe that there is a creative personal power in the universe who is the ground and essence of all reality-a power that cannot be explained in materialistic terms. History is ultimately guided by spirit, not matter.
Second, I strongly disagreed with communism’s ethical relativism. Since for the Communist there is no divine government, no absolute moral order, there are no fixed, immutable principles; consequently almost anything-force, violence murder, lying-is a justifiable means to the ‘millennial’ end. This type of relativism was abhorrent to me. Constructive ends can never give absolute moral justification to destructive means, because in the final analysis the end is pre-existent in the means.
Third, I opposed communism’s political totalitarianism. In communism, the individual ends up in subjection to the state. True, the Marxists would argue that the state is an ‘interim’ reality which is to be eliminated when the classless society emerges; but the state is the end while it lasts, and man is only a means to that end. And if man’s so-called rights and liberties stand in the way of that end, they are simply swept aside. His liberties of expression, his freedom to vote, and his freedom to listen to what news he likes or to choose his books are all restricted. Man becomes hardly more, in communism, than a depersonalized cog in the turning wheel of the state.
This deprecation of individual freedom was objectionable to me. I am convinced now, as I was then, that man is an end because he is a child of God. Man is not made for the state; the state is made for man. To deprive man of freedom is to relegate him to the status of a thing, rather than elevate him to the status of a person. Man must never be treated as means to the end of the state; but always as an end within himself.”
Martin Luther King Jr., *Stride Toward Freedom: The Montgomery Story* (New York: Harper and Row, 1957), 92-93

Don’t forget that the above was written in 1957, a period in which the oppressions of the Soviet Union are painfully evident, evidenced by the brutal repression of the Hungarian uprising in 1956. At the time Stride toward Freedom was written, domestic attitudes toward communism could not have been more hostile. Toward the end of Dr. Martin Luther King’s life, the counterculture revolution of the sixties and the leftist tinted civil rights movement made favorable considerations of communism generally more palatable.

While Martin Luther King Day should be one of reflection and appreciation for what has been accomplished, and a reckoning of what still needs to be done, it should also be a day of understanding, in terms clear of emotionally driven rhetoric, where the civil rights movement went wrong. A major key to this understanding, I would contend, is the destructive effects that communist ideas and outright infiltration has had on the African-American community. Communists tried to use African-Americans as cannon fodder by stoking hatred and racial division. A predominantly white left-wing establishment promoted Black communists in order to preserve an informal system of oppression.

The fact is that he WAS a socialist and that goes to the heart of what went wrong with the civil rights establishment after the legal battles against codified discrimination were won.

I am a black man who has been getting calluses on my dome from butting heads with those in my community who refuse to relinquish big government statist solutions for the problems plaguing the black community in favor of free market solutions that are far more appropriate today. These forces frequently cite Dr. King and use his exhortations to government to lead the way. They specifically cite his socialist outlook as justification for their continuance. The two parent black family was destroyed by LBJ’s welfare state. That was the worst cultural calamity to EVER befall the black community in the US, and the most destructive force in its cultural life notwithstanding the imposition of Jim Crow law via the Supreme Court’s Plessy v Fergueson decision. MLK was a leading proponent for expanding the welfare state, whose baleful effects were just beginning to be seen in the black community.

MLK was a man of enormous charisma and courage and certainly a pivotal figure in the civil rights movement. There is much about him that I admire. An assessment of his life could creditably yield the adjective of great. Despite that, he does not deserve to be the ONLY American with his own holiday named after him. That honor should be reserved for only one person in American history, the greatest of all Americans, George Washington. More so than any other SINGLE figure in our history, he was the “indispensable man.” Without his courage, acumen, honor, and integrity, the US would simply not exist, and if it did, it probably would have been as a monarchy and certainly not as a constitutional republic.

It is my opinion that the greatest political philosophers for liberty in the history of mankind were those men that this nation was blessed to have at its inception the Founding Fathers. Notwithstanding this opinion, I am constantly being exhorted by leftist deconstructionists to never forget that many of them were slaveowners, sexist, and slaughterers of innocent Indians. None of this changes the totality of my opinion of them in the great good they accomplished by founding this nation.

I simply say that a similar yardstick should be applied to Martin Luther King in the impact that his legacy has on the modern-day civil rights movement.

MLK’s birthday holiday was a sop to PC and a reflection of the DemocRAT Congress that voted it. The depth of MLK’s association with the most anti-freedom ideology (Communism) of our time will prove to very discomfiting when it is fully revealed. Additionally, MLK’s legacy to the modern day civil rights movement is a socialist bequeathment that of looking to big government solutions for many of the behavioral problems in today’s black community. MLK continues to cast a long shadow over most of the modern day civil rights establishment and black politicians who largely reject free market, educationally based solutions to the unique problems plaguing the black community.


23 posted on 01/17/2011 3:26:37 PM PST by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

Why has this debunked nonsense been posted again ?


24 posted on 01/17/2011 3:29:11 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cruise_missile

Gun control laws were initially passed to keep guns from blacks.


25 posted on 01/17/2011 3:31:13 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson