Skip to comments.Church Official Calls for ‘All-Russian Dress Code’(No mini-skirts says Russian Orthodox priest)
Posted on 01/18/2011 12:32:52 PM PST by Cronos
A top official for the Russian Orthodox Church on Tuesday proposed creating an all-Russian dress code, lashing out at women who leave the house painted like a clown and confuse the street with striptease......
He argued that clothing is not a private business, and that he hoped that Russia would soon be a place where scantily-dressed women or men in track suits would not be admitted into public venues.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
I am friendly with some Orthodox folks here in Manhattan. The priest, who is about my age (early 50s)really gets peeved when women come in in mini-skirts. Some of the more pious people wear head-coverings. He doesn’t want the guys coming in wearing t-shirts and gym shorts. But this priest in Russia is advocating a dress code for more than just church. OK, ladies, drag out that babushka.
A German court just ruled that women must wear bras at work. White or Flesh colored only and the women must have clean finger nails. Please cue up the photo from Bananas.
The ACLU would be all over that one like maggots on garbage.
If she is actively inviting contact, and then is surprised that this contact ends with a rape, she is all the more at fault.
Oh yeah. Nothing to disagree with there. /s
Do you also agree with the Taliban? I believe they’re not pleased with mini-skirts either.
How about just “No fat chicks”? I could support that one.
In other news, a study has found that children who play on the interstate highways are killed by cars more often than those children who play in their backyards.
If I had a role to play regarding Russian morality, it might be awhile before I got around to a dress code for non-ecclesiastical functions
Have we exported some kooks to Russia///????
When truth is spoken to corruption - well look who howls.
Obviously girls wearing revealing clothes should not drink in places where rapists drink.
I'd settle for a law that forces men to remove their hats when they're inside.
“If I had a role to play regarding Russian morality, it might be awhile before I got around to a dress code for non-ecclesiastical functions”
Well, you have to start somewhere. This may be a good place.
Some seem to think the two choices are: burkas or public nudity.
I think there is a solid middle.
You could set basic community standards without destroying freedom. We already have laws against public nudity, and we seem to be coping with those just fine.
The priesthood is the enemy of freedom, no priest ridden people ever have full freedom. The guy is clearly deranged,,, Russian women should dress just the way they do. Can’t believe we might have nuked them,,, all those hotties!
I'm not sure the Orthodox Priest has a role to play enforcing his views on non-church members. I wouldn't want Mormons or Baptists, for example, deciding the issue of liquor permits for everyone. He should counsel his flock and grow it if he can.
In what state can you walk around nude in public?
Sadly, I am not an authority on this subject but I believe several states besides NY do not require women to wear tops
‘History provides no example of a preist ridden people maintaining a free civil government’ Jefferson
Nowhere does that quote suggest doing what the soviets did, don’t be trite. The idea is that preists need to stay in their domain. He wants a law telling people out in town to dress according to his code.
You imply that the choice is a priesthood that dominates society, or a priesthood in the gulag. That’s a false choice,,, this guys job is to teach and convince, not to create law enforcing his belief.
>>>”OK, ladies, drag out that babushka.”<<<
Maybe the Russian Orthodox Church had Vladimir Putin’s ‘alleged’ affair with that 26 yr old gymnast Alina Kabayeva in mind..
Or, maybe Russian Orthodox Church is taking lessons from Iranian Ayatollahs ‘morality police’ regarding ‘dress code’ for women!
Seriously, I don’t think one can effectively ‘legislate’ against matters that are largely & essentially about upbringing, values, having a sense of personal judgement & decorum. Then again, I know quite a few Russians, and based on what I’ve heard, Russia & generally many Eastern European countries (similar to their southeast asian counterparts) have serious social challenges ... “Mail Order Brides” is an interesting concept & practice!
What is a mini-skirt?
I was clear enough and never suggested priests be eliminated. Jyst that they should not seek to enforce their desires through law.
I will go enjoy the russian women in mini skirts,,,, and you go enjoy whatever you prefer to look at. lol
besides read closer, he didn’t just give an opinion. He wants a dress code mandatory for all of russia.
He's a Russian citizen, isn't he? Does his ordained status cause him to lose the right to speak out about Russian social issues and politics? Ordained men should be banned from the public square -- isn't that what you want?
And you want a speech code. The big difference between you and him being that he's a citizen of the place and a member of its cultural/social structure -- and you're not.
No need to overreact, I just want guys like him to lose when they argue for national dress codes that are based in his religious sensibilities rather than widely accepted norms, such as not being topless. I would feel the same if the mormons for example, wanted a law requiring all women to wear homespun dresses.
hey sport I never suggest of the speech code, I just want to speech to get laughed at.
sorry, droid’s a pain sometimes. That is, I want his speech snickered at when he wants to be a boss of society.
what was the mormon russia the wouldn’t need to be a law, now would be there? But ok,, we can do it your way,,, all the women should dress like the amish to make SOME men feel better! lol
That is, if it were the norm there, as you opine. There would’t NEED to be a law, would there? For example, not walking around naked, IS a norm. Therefore, no law is needed.
“Public nudity, although not always welcomed by the denizens of the town, was not forbidden by any Vermont statute or Brattleboro ordinance until July 17, 2007. The town has drawn national attention when nudists make a visit to take advantage of the situation.
On July 17, 2007, Brattleboro town officials passed an emergency rule by a 32 margin, temporarily “banning nudity on the main roads and within 250 feet of any school or place of worship, among other places” due to a number of complaints.
On August 22, 2007, the Brattleboro Selectboard decided not to make the ban on nudity permanent, once again allowing nudity in the town when the temporary statute ran out in September.
However, on December 4, 2007 the Selectboard made the ban permanent. Nudity is now banned, and one faces a $100 charge if cited.”
“Thats a false choice,,, this guys job is to teach and convince, not to create law enforcing his belief.”
What if the Orthodox Priest believes it is a sin to murder? Should he encourage laws against it?
What if he believes it is a sin to steal? Shall he work for that to be illegal?
What moral beliefs is he allowed to want reflected in the civil code, and what moral beliefs are excluded?
Trite argument. Murder and theft are crimes against the rights of a specific individual, THAT is why they are codified. Athiest and saved both agree that they dont want to be murdered or be the victim of theft.
But this guy wants women to dress in a way that satisfies his religion. Her wearing a short skirt “doesn’t pick a pocket, nor break a bone”.
Thats why he shouldn’t expect to get a LAW. Maybe i dont like to see a man in a dress,, should there be a law that he can’t walk around in womens clothes? My preacher wears pants, like a man. See the problem?
“What moral beliefs is he allowed to want reflected in the civil code, and what moral beliefs are excluded?”
An example would be church attendance, or maybe fasting for lent, or maybe women working outside the home. He might have sincere and theologically correct positions on those issues,,, but i believe he would be morally wrong to try to codify them into civil law. Thats not for him to IMPOSE on those outside his flock.
OTOH, When there is a violation of a persons individual rights, such as murder or theft, we write a law.
Your only defense is to become a theocrat or collectivist. That church should rule temporally, or that the collective is the most important unit of rights. (the same argument the anti-gun crowd uses to attack the 2nd amendment)
‘OTOH, When there is a violation of a persons individual rights, such as murder or theft, we write a law.”
But then we must decide what a person’s individual rights are.
Do I have the right to be in the public square without being literally forced to look at naked people?
I say I do.
“Athiest and saved both agree that they dont want to be murdered or be the victim of theft.”
There are many atheists and others, some may actually claim to be saved, who actually kill and steal, so, there are truly plenty of people who would not mind if murder and/or theft were legal or unpunished.
I don’t think I have a trite argument. My argument is: you can’t arbitrarily decide what religious beliefs can be codified into law, and what can’t.
Because your arbitrary decision are different than mine are different from Ted Bundy are different from the imam are different from Charles Manson are different from my grandma.
I could certainly support a law against cross dressing. I am sure a good majority if not a plurality of Americans would support it. Is it majority rule? Or, if not, what then is our standard?
Well it’s still legal for women to go topless in NY state which I guarantee would give the good father apoplexy
State parks, anyway.
“Some communities such as New York State, and the province of Ontario, Canada, have made it legal for women to go topless. Though in New York State it is only legal in state parks and is celebrated yearly by the Buffalo Six. Women in both areas have faced legal battles to obtain those rights, though few take advantage of them.”
“There are many atheists and others, some may actually claim to be saved, who actually kill and steal, so, there are truly plenty of people who would not mind if murder and/or theft were legal or unpunished.”
You miss the point entirely. Homicide is illegal because of the people who do not want ***their*** right to life violated via murder, by others, NOT because everybody agrees that you shouldn’t murder.
YOUR point that there are some people who would love to steal and murder, is why we have a law. To protect the people who want to be protected from them.
You certainly can arbitrarily do it. The answer is this,, we do not codify religious belief into law. For example, you do not outlaw eating meat of friday, etc. Law is centered around the individual and their god given rights to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. Rights involve what you are free to do without harming others. A miniskirt harms nobody.
Ok, then we will disagree. Just like the left does, this man and you think every “good idea” should be a law. A progessive wants me to have a spaghetti light bulb, and not to drive an SUV. And this guy wants the women to be required by law to dress to his taste. Same thing,,,
Best stopped the minute they start up the idea.
“Is it majority rule? Or, if not, what then is our standard?”
NO, it isn’t majority rule, it is a constitutional republic. The standard is, does it pick your pocket or break your bone? If not, freedom is the default. No society needs the preachers often good ideas to have force of law. I have yet to have you articulate why it should be a law to make women dress to the standard of the most modest people here. Thats the taliban way.
Thats the operating system called “Europe 1.0”