Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[CALIFORNIA STATE] COURT INVALIDATES UNCONSTITUTIONAL AMMUNITION REGULATION STATUTE (AB962)
Calguns Foundation ^ | 1/18/2011 | NA

Posted on 01/18/2011 12:50:03 PM PST by RKV

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Thank you C.D. Michel.
1 posted on 01/18/2011 12:50:11 PM PST by RKV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bang

!


2 posted on 01/18/2011 12:51:07 PM PST by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV; DarthVader
.."durn tootin !"
3 posted on 01/18/2011 12:52:58 PM PST by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

The gun banners will be back. Then we’ll beat them again.


4 posted on 01/18/2011 12:53:53 PM PST by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RKV

“unconstitutionally vague on its face”

This is good, but I’d rather see such laws struck down as violations of the Second Amendment than on a technicality like vagueness. That leaves the door open for the anti-gun nuts to come back with a more specific law.


5 posted on 01/18/2011 12:55:33 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Save that for the next round. Meanwhile spread fear, uncertainty and doubt among the enemies of liberty. And I’m saying that in the nicest way possible. ;>)


6 posted on 01/18/2011 12:57:18 PM PST by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RKV

So.... what did they give up to get this? Nothing comes free, especially when the libtards are involved. What’s the catch?


7 posted on 01/18/2011 12:58:23 PM PST by HushTX (I have finally started reading The Federalist Papers. Great stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV

!! WIN !!

I thought the law covered all kinds of ammunition, not just handgun ammunition?


8 posted on 01/18/2011 1:00:02 PM PST by smokingfrog (Do all the talking you want, but do what I tell you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HushTX

The catch is this is a state court ruling and may be appealed, or the legislature will try again. Then we beat them again.


9 posted on 01/18/2011 1:00:58 PM PST by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

NRA/2nd Amendment PING


10 posted on 01/18/2011 1:02:25 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

That will be the next bill. Then we bring in Alan Gura, go to federal court and he kicks their @$$. Again.


11 posted on 01/18/2011 1:02:43 PM PST by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RKV

Yeah, I realize that much. I just anticipate something like a ban on magazines that hold more than 2 rounds, or magazines made out of plastic or metal. Or maybe the ammo issue is solved, but there is a 200% tax on all ammunition. I’m a grumpy cynic, though, so I automatically assume the worst.

And no, this is not an anti-California sentiment. I just wonder about the proverbial other shoe.


12 posted on 01/18/2011 1:07:57 PM PST by HushTX (I have finally started reading The Federalist Papers. Great stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HushTX

My take is we need 2-3 more Supreme Court verdicts to get the CA legislature to give up. Working on making that happen. ;>)


13 posted on 01/18/2011 1:10:13 PM PST by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RKV

Yeah baby!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


14 posted on 01/18/2011 1:12:05 PM PST by Enterprise (TSA - The Silly Agency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV
Yesterdays Times-Standard carried a story about local dealers stocking up on ammo in anticipation of a rush. Just a few months ago there was a shortage...
15 posted on 01/18/2011 1:12:13 PM PST by tubebender (The coldest winter I ever spent was a summer in Eureka...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV

Good luck with your future litigation.

Meanwhile, San Joaquin Valley warrants CC - one way or the other.


16 posted on 01/18/2011 1:14:05 PM PST by frog in a pot (We need a working definition of "domestic enemies" if the oath of office is to have meaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RKV
The lawsuit, Parker v. California is funded exclusively by the NRA and the CRPA Foundation.

I thought everyone had abandoned the single issue NRA for more "effective" groups like GOA.

17 posted on 01/18/2011 1:14:57 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

Actually its CalGuns and Second Amendment Foundation they’re going to. You know, SAF? The guys who brought you Alan Gura, Heller v. DC and McDonald v. Chicago? Those guys. And yes I’m an NRA member.


18 posted on 01/18/2011 1:20:24 PM PST by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RKV

It’s always nice to see that a judge here or there still gives a rat’s behind about the US Constitution.


19 posted on 01/18/2011 1:21:09 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Law firm twitter feed.

http://twitter.com/MichelLawyers

free stuff

http://michellawyers.com/reference-materials/firearm-law-references/order-civil-rights-advocacy-cards-stickers-and-other-free-stuff/

http://michellawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Order-Form-10.28.10-Fill-Fields.pdf


20 posted on 01/18/2011 1:21:59 PM PST by smokingfrog (Do all the talking you want, but do what I tell you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson