Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigun
Oration is completely different when it comes to analysis, too. Where both Federalist and anti-Federalist tracts appeared in the newspapers (which is most of what we've dealt with on this project) they're cut up into reasonably digestible 1000-word (or so) chunks. Concision is required because newsprint isn't cheap. Speech, on the other hand, especially in the style of the day, tends to be more circular instead of linear; that is, in Henry's case you can follow what appears to be an argument to a conclusion and completely misinterpret it because it isn't finished, he returns to it later. It isn't a logical form, it's a dramatic form.

The status of Virginia as a state within a union is one example. At one point you think Henry might even be for secession, at another for the union at maybe more cost than Virginia might desire, and eventually you find out it's actually neither but a bit of both. These are not contiguous sections of the speech. The listener of the day would have found that boring and single-minded.

By the standards of the period, this is a short speech. No kidding.

6 posted on 01/20/2011 8:49:27 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Billthedrill
By the standards of the period, this is a short speech. No kidding.

I know! I was just trying to start the thread off with a bit of levity. Not very good at that I suppose.

7 posted on 01/20/2011 9:26:34 AM PST by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson