Posted on 01/22/2011 4:35:26 AM PST by markomalley
How dumb do you have to be to NOT know that BO’s, or any person’s BC is not available to the public?
Where has Gov. Abercrombie been for the last three years??? Is the rest of the Democrat Party as out to lunch as he is....wait! I know the answer to that.
Methinks the governor has stepped in it, bigtime.
Seriously folks, it’s time to run this phony out on a rail.
They all know that the BC, if there is one as Fukino said, not only can be disclosed but UIPA says it MUST be disclosed now that Fukino made a public announcement about what is on it.
That’s why Abercrombie brought the whole thing up. He knows he can (and should) disclose it, and he intended to disclose a forgery. It was only when he realized that a state could require the TRANSACTION LOGS for a BC to be disclosed (which would reveal a forgery and/or tampering) that he got cold feet and went hiding behind the same fake excuse that Fukino used.
But he didn’t go running for cover until AFTER he had said that they had to look in the ARCHIVES to find something written for Obama - which, if true, contradicts what Fukino said because a BC would not be in the archives. What Abercrombie said contradicts the whole story line thus far and prompts questions as to who is lying - Abercrombie, or Fukino?
This was clearly NOT an attempt to frame “birthers” as they buy into a “there isn’t a BC” head fake. This was an attempt by Obama’s handlers to prepare the country for Abercrombie to unveil Obama’s BC - a forgery. Unless we pass state laws requiring birth and/or citizenship records AND the transaction logs for those records, the Soros machine could legally “get away” with a forgery. But with the possibility of state laws being passed requiring the transaction logs, Abercrombie realized he could very easily be sitting in jail if he presented a forgery.
In his interview last Friday, Abercrombie was clearly talking about the political ramifications of a BC not being disclosed, realizing that states may require a BC for placement on their ballot. Abercrombie’s effort - by his own admission - was meant to address the potential eligibility bills on the horizon. That was his self-admitted focus.
And when he got to looking at what bills could be introduced and passed, he decided he better back down pronto. Because a state could require the transaction logs which would reveal the forgery he and Obama’s handlers had planned to use.
That under race it says, “White”!
How convenient!
so this basically boils down to the boy won't sign SF-180... is that it???
The latest editorial from The Daily Pen...
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/01/abercrombie-gets-bailed-out-by-hawaiian.html
Neil Abercrombie is a hippie era free spirit. Obama had been studiously ignoring him until this. Now he can bask in the glow of his Obama-messiah’s attention
AUNT ZEITUNI.>>>>
What a slovenly parasite. Reminds me of Obama+Moochelle except for the slovenly part
Well, they may be bogus, but only you are Pachysandra. And that’s a good thing...
I’m no attorney, but would you not agree that, if no certificate of live birth can be discovered in Hawaiian state records, its absence calls into question how anyone could legally attest that 0bama was in fact qualified as a presidential candidate in the first place?
Which again begs the question “How did he manage to get on the ballot in HI in 2008?” At least 3 other people other than Obama probably know the answer to this question, including Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi and Kevin Cronin, the former Chief Elections Officer in Hawaii.
A lot of valuable research can be found here...
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/01/o-con-had-legal-help-from-non-partisan.html
So the last line of defense for Obama to get on the ballot in HI was one man. Could one man be corrupted into becoming complicit with a conspiracy? You tell me.
I think the person who should be on the case is Issa. Issue the damn subpeona: Bring forth the original birth certificate, forthwith. It is a government issue as it calls into question the proper application of constitution law IMO.
Perhaps this whole thing by Abercrombie is an attempt to side track any subpeona: “we cannot locate it”.
Sure. How plain can it be. Obama is pulling the biggest con game ever. Scary that no one is willing to call him out on it.
I disagree on your #1:
It would be too hot for them [SCOTUS] to handle
It's SCOTUS’ job to handle "hot" constitutional issues. They already refuse to take what they decide to be trivial cases.
IOW, they don’t want to deal with the cases they deem too hot or too trivial. What does the country do to resolve legal and constitutional issues? Shall we have three Supreme Courts, one for trivial, one for garden variety and one for hot cases?
SCOTUS cowardice is leading the constitutional shredders to do what they please and eventually when communists take over, there will be SCOT SINO and we can kiss the Republic good bye.
I agree with your #2. Again, cowardice may come to play. Republicans in state and federal levels should grow some spines and other body parts by requiring eligibility proof for anyone who wants a place on the ballot.
As I always believed, 0b0z0 won't be running in '12. A good reason could very well be the fear of some states will get it done and won't place him in their ballots.
Does privacy laws prevent disclosure of the lack of documentation?
We ought to have a Freeper list of WHAT could or could not be on the birth certificate...all the possibilities.
Damn check speller, made it Chinese!
SCOT SINO ———> SCOTUSINO (in name only)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.