Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court orders Emanuel off mayoral ballot
Chicago Tribune ^ | Jan. 24, 2011 | Kristen Mack

Posted on 01/24/2011 12:36:14 PM PST by Cincinatus

Rahm Emanuel should not appear on the Feb. 22 mayoral ballot because he does not meet the residency standard, according to a ruling issued by a state appellate court today.

Emanuel told a news conference he would appeal the decision to the Illinois Supreme Court and would ask for an injunction so his name will appear on the mayoral ballot.

"I have no doubt at the end we'll prevail in this effort," Emanuel said. “We’ll now go to the next level to get clarity."

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chicago; mayor; mob; politics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Those judges better be careful turning their car ignitions tonight...
1 posted on 01/24/2011 12:36:17 PM PST by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

It depends what the definition of “resident” is. Could be interpreted to mean “left at least one suitcase in town for a year”


2 posted on 01/24/2011 12:40:30 PM PST by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Missouri gal

That judge will find a suitcase full of cash and a threat, then all will be cozy for Rahm.


3 posted on 01/24/2011 12:46:11 PM PST by freebird5850 (It ain't about where he was born, it's about dual citizenship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
Court orders Emanuel off mayoral ballot-

Rahm Emanuel should not appear on the Feb. 22 mayoral ballot

because he does not meet the Rat-Hole residency standard,

according to a ruling issued by

the State of Illlinois Pest and Vermin Control Board today.

4 posted on 01/24/2011 12:46:46 PM PST by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Missouri gal
Totally.

The court could rule so tight that if any candidate had LEFT THE CITY for even 1 second during the preceding year he or she could not be on the ballot.

Might be time for the courts to put Chicago to the test regarding their open ended law on residency of candidates.

5 posted on 01/24/2011 12:46:49 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

If we could only have this same disappointment fall upon his old boss.


6 posted on 01/24/2011 12:48:31 PM PST by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

How’s this for clarity, RAHM!


7 posted on 01/24/2011 12:50:59 PM PST by ChocChipCookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

Meh.
Either way, Chicago is going to get the mayor it so richly deserves.


8 posted on 01/24/2011 1:01:42 PM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE
IF the court can make this stick it sets a precedent for the next presidential election.

Expect near infinite pressure from the White House on this one.

9 posted on 01/24/2011 1:08:01 PM PST by null and void (We are now in day 734 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

“I have no doubt at the end we’ll prevail in this effort,” Emanuel said.”

Of course he will. It’s just a matter of getting the right judges...


10 posted on 01/24/2011 1:09:36 PM PST by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

You’re absolutely right. This leaves the field open for Carol Mostly-Fraud.


11 posted on 01/24/2011 1:11:37 PM PST by Ax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChocChipCookie

More clarity....R AH M...


12 posted on 01/24/2011 1:14:22 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

I guess those judges don’t have a union card? Seriously they need to watch their backs for quite a while.


13 posted on 01/24/2011 1:16:26 PM PST by vpintheak (Democrats: Robbing humans of their dignity 1 law at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
He moved himself and his family out of the state of Chicago to take a job.

He didn't commute...He left Chicago....even rented out his former house...He simply hasn't been residing in Chicago for the past year.

Had his wife and kids remained in Chicago and he was commuting....whole different story...

He was a landlord, not a resident.

14 posted on 01/24/2011 1:21:47 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

Sounds like Carol Moseley Braun has been consulting with a community organizer.


15 posted on 01/24/2011 1:23:22 PM PST by RoadKingSE (How do you know that the light at the end of the tunnel isn't a muzzle flash ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
Big whoops....Chicago is not a state!!! Oh my...

But I suppose it could be the 57th state...

16 posted on 01/24/2011 1:23:30 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

The people of Chicago got a short reprieve. This guy has too many corrupt connections not to get his own way. Poster child for what has gone wrong in the USA with cronyism and corruption and special rules for connected political hacks. The career path is either to get political connections first and then go rip off the system, or vice versa and rip it off twice.

We need pols that get into the political system to serve the public short term and then get out. They are few and far between.


17 posted on 01/24/2011 1:26:03 PM PST by apoliticalone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
It's a state (not city) law and the elements are pretty specific.
Should be interesting. I’m guessing the IL. Supremes (if they take it) affirm the ruling.
18 posted on 01/24/2011 1:31:45 PM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

So, a candidate drives outside of Chicago for a half an hour to visit a Wal-Mart. Does that mean he broke his one year residency?


19 posted on 01/24/2011 1:40:22 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

Of course his “budds” have put all of the Supreme Court justices in their jobs, so little Rahm has no worries.


20 posted on 01/24/2011 2:02:15 PM PST by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson