Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's Project 022 FAC
Forecast International ^ | January 25, 2011 | Stuart Slade

Posted on 01/26/2011 4:51:46 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

China's Project 022 FAC ⋅

NEWTOWN, Conn. - The Chinese Navy's Project 022 class is, despite its innovative hull design, a classic missile-armed fast attack craft. It is designed for the sole purpose of delivering eight anti-ship missiles to a specified naval target and has virtually no capability outside that area. Its design makes it unsuitable for patrol duties, while its short operational radius limits its applicability to maritime policing work. In military roles, it is virtually defenseless against air attack and would have to rely on speed and agility to survive in a hostile environment. Craft in this general category were once in great vogue, but experience has shown that they are not an effective military unit outside very limited and specific areas. However, the Chinese Navy happens to have one of those limited and specific areas as a primary operational requirement. Thus, in its specific geostrategic situation, the Project 022 is a viable and effective craft.

The Chinese Navy has gone to significant lengths to reduce the investment in any single Project 022 class FAC-M to a minimum. This does not just apply to equipment standards, austere though they are, but to manpower. The Project 022 has a crew of 12 to 14 sailors, less than half that of similar craft. At a unit cost of an estimated $50 million each, the Chinese could afford both the financial and manpower commitment needed to operate a very large fleet of these craft. Construction is expected to exceed 100 hulls and may well go beyond that point.

The catamaran hull form used by the Project 022 appears to be successful, and films of the class at sea show the craft handle well. This raises the possibility that variants of the design might well be evolved to handle a wider spectrum of operational requirements. Stripping out the bulky and heavy missile tubes would provide space and weight for the equipment needed to handle rigid inflatable boats and the other equipment necessary for maritime policing operations. This would allow the Chinese to offer a low-cost and effective competitor in the offshore patrol craft sector.

Over the years, the Chinese have sold large numbers of attack and patrol craft around the world. At present some 40 coastal patrol craft and 70 missile-armed fast attack craft built in China remain in service. The Project 022 would be in an excellent position to replace the latter as they begin to wear and need to be replaced. The postulated maritime patrol craft variant of the design would be well placed to replace the former group. The export market for the Project 022 and derivatives thereof certainly exists; it is up to the Chinese to turn a potential into reality.

Source: Forecast International

Associated URL:

Source Date: January 25, 2011

Author: Stuart Slade, Senior Naval Analyst

Posted: 01/25/2011

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; fac; missileboat; type022

The Project 022 FAC-M

Source: People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN

1 posted on 01/26/2011 4:51:50 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
We, as a nation, give them money to develop weapons to use against us, while we cut back on defence systems because we can't afford it...


2 posted on 01/26/2011 5:00:34 AM PST by MichaelP ("Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
lol....good frakin grief...Chinese espionage....errrrrr, innovation, at its best. /s =.=
3 posted on 01/26/2011 5:33:38 AM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichaelP
We could easily afford any military craft, airframe, land vehicle, if we took a mere $400 billion out of DHHS’ budget (FY 2010 at $875 billion). But absolutely no one wants to talk about cutting this monster. Rather, the pols want to focus on the NASA and DOD budgets at $5 billion and 720 billion, while the media totally ignores it.

From FY 2009, NASA’s budget increased slightly, while DOD declined by nearly $100 billion. DHHS, on the other hand, increased by some $80 billion (or nearly the entire sum cut from DOD).

Historically speaking, mil and space had been the drivers for innovation, education, and employment.

Personally, I'd pretty much gut DHHS - reducing its budget to $10 billion at best, use some of the remaining 865 billion to reduce the deficit, split the rest between DOD and NASA.

Let DOD do what it does best with the money, but dedicate the NASA money to R&D, support, infrastructure, and tracking; a sizable portion would be dedicated toward pushing commercial prizes/goals.

On the political front simultaneously, the US would withdraw from the UN Space Treaty, thereby permitting private companies to keep any ventures beyond LEO proprietary - rather than become property of the UN as things stand with the Treaty.

US industry and education would be forced to rebuild - creating many high paying jobs and well educated and motivated kids.

4 posted on 01/26/2011 5:54:51 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine .. now it is your turn..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Sounds like a plan to me...


5 posted on 01/26/2011 5:57:15 AM PST by MichaelP ("Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Ah, the new Clinton Class Missile Cruiser.

Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

6 posted on 01/26/2011 8:45:11 AM PST by The Comedian (Obama is just the cherry on top of the $hit sundae of fraud the democrats have become.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson