Posted on 01/26/2011 6:09:57 AM PST by rochester_veteran
Insisting the Tea Party is a "force for good" Rep. Michele Bachmann blasted health care reform, called for deep budget cuts and blamed President Obama for failing to find solutions to help the struggling economy.
The response to President Obama's State of the Union address, was on behalf of the tea party movement, and followed the Republican Party's official response on Tuesday night.
(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...
“Some GOP aides were reportedly annoyed with Bachmann’s decision, fearing it could appear that the Republicans and the Tea Party were competing with each other. “
Gee, ya think? Who are these “GOP Aides”? Nicole Wallace and other McCainiacs and Romney-bot retreads??
“CNN, the only cable network to air her rebuttal live, was criticized by some who called it irresponsible journalism”
Snaps to CNN for resisting the charge of the RINOs.
She’s way ahead now. ‘A” is winning!
A response deserving A.
I’ve come to the conclusion that those who consider Obama to be a great orator and an intellectual giant have low expectations or know nothing about his background. If they knew the truth about his past and current associations, they would realize what he alll most everything he says has nothing to do with his intentions.
A-55%
F-27%
Lets keep it up folks.
“BTW- Michelle needs a little honest feedback. Look at the camera”
Apparently, there were two cameras - one for the Web feed, one for TV broadcast. This was clearly a production problem and not giving Michelle the proper sight lines.
bttt
Some GOP aides were reportedly annoyed with Bachmann’s decision, fearing it could appear that the Republicans and the Tea Party were competing with each other.
B I N G O!
Patriots response to dunham...
http://wasobamaborninkenya.com/1961%20Kenyan%20Birth%20Certificate%20of%20Barack%20Hussein%20Obama%20II,%20Copy.pdf
That is the first thing I noticed. She was looking to the right of where the camera lens was. Found it strange. Watching her eyes they did not seem to indicate she was reading her speech.
How would you rate Rep. Bachmann’s response to the State of the Union speech?
A 57%
B 4%
C 0%
D 4%
F 28%
I don’t know. I didn’t see it. 6%
It's kinda like when people talk to you and they don't look you in the eye, but they look at your forehead. Rather than listening to what they say, you just keep asking yourself, why won't they look me in the eye?
I suspect that practically nobody watched it anyway.
How would you rate Rep. Bachmann’s response to the State of the Union speech?
A 57%
B 4%
C 0%
D 4%
F 28%
I don’t know. I didn’t see it. 6%
Voting anything but an’A’ is like voting for Ross Perot..it splits the vote and we lose.
A 56%
B 4%
C 0%
D 4%
F 28%
I don’t know. I didn’t see it. 6%
As for Eye contact... they apparently didn’t have a teleprompter comparable to ... the ONE’s
A 56%
B 4%
C 0%
D 4%
F 28%
I don’t know. I didn’t see it. 6%
As for Eye contact... they apparently didn’t have a teleprompter comparable to ... the ONE’s
Just voted - lotsa A’s...
A 53%
B 5%
C 1%
D 4%
F 30%
I don’t know. I didn’t see it. 7%
After voting
A 54%
B 4%
C 1%
D 4%
F 30%
I don’t know. I didn’t see it. 7%
re eye contact, is it just possible that they either did not instruct her properly or just maybe they switched cameras cues purposely. ( I thought there were at least two cameras trained on her). Is it possible that it was done on purpose?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.