Another reason to move to where my wife is from.
This is an anti-deathcare protest bill. They’re trying to illustrate a constitutional point with regard to obastard’s deathcare individual mandate. They aren’t seriously trying to pass this.
While I’m a big supporter of the second amendment, I disagree with this bill.
1. The government should not have the power to force citizens to exercise their second amendment right, just as it should not have the power to force the citzens to lose it.
2. I’m a little happier knowing its awake patriots that are well armed, not every leftist Islamic sympathizer, union thug, and soccer mom who voted for Obama given the times that are coming.
Let’s not fall into this trap.
They’d better word it well. If it’s a mandate and compels them to spend money, it might be unconstitutions.
However, if they state issues you one that would be fine.
Every bit as Constitutional as ObamaCare’s requirement to buy health insurance...
Isn’t that like forcing people to buy health insurance? I’m not trying to be flippant. What’s the difference?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pospolite_ruszenie
suggests that the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth not only allowed the ownership of weapons, but required the nobles (szlachta) to own weapons and to make themselves available for service if the country was attacked.
Maybe you needed to get a government issued permit to NOT own a weapon!